Management of patients with a tracheostomy tube includes many components of care provided by clinicians from various health care disciplines. In recent years, clinicians worldwide have demonstrated a renewed interest in the management of patients with tracheostomy due to the recognition that more effective and efficient management of this patient population is necessary to decrease morbidity and mortality and to optimize the value of the procedure. Commensurate with the goal of enhancing the care of patients with tracheostomy, we conducted a systematic review to facilitate the development of recommendations relevant to the care of adult patients with tracheostomy in the acute care setting. From our systematic review, clinical practice guidelines were developed to address questions regarding the impact of tracheostomy bundles, tracheostomy teams, and protocol-directed care on time to decannulation, length of stay, tracheostomy-related cost, tracheostomy-related adverse events, and other tracheostomy-related outcomes in tracheostomized adult patients in the acute care setting. Using a modification of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, 3 recommendations were developed to assist clinicians with tracheostomy management of adult patients in the acute care setting: (1) evidence supports the use of tracheostomy bundles that have been evaluated and approved by a team of individuals experienced in tracheostomy management to decrease time to decannulation, tracheostomy-related adverse events, and other tracheostomy-related outcomes, namely, improved tolerance of oral diet; (2) evidence supports the addition of a multidisciplinary tracheostomy team to improve time to decannulation, length of stay, tracheostomy-related adverse events, and other tracheostomy-related outcomes, namely, increased speaking valve use; (3) evidence supports the use of a weaning/decannulation protocol to guide weaning and removal of the tracheostomy tube to improve time to decannulation.
HessDR. Facilitating speech in the patient with a tracheostomy. Respir Care, 2005; 50(4):519–525.
2.
HeffnerJE, MillerKS, SahnSA. Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Part 1: indications, technique, management. Chest, 1986; 90(2):269–274.
3.
HeffnerJE, MillerKS, SahnSA. Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Part 2: complications. Chest, 1986; 90(3):430–436.
4.
KollefMH, AhrensTS, ShannonW. Clinical predictors and outcomes for patients requiring tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 1999; 27(9):1714–1720.
5.
FischlerL, ErhartS, KlegerGR, FrutigerA. Prevalence of tracheostomy in ICU patients: a nation-wide survey in Switzerland. Intensive Care Med, 2000; 26(10):1428–1433.
6.
Frutos-VivarF, EstebanA, ApezteguiaC, AnzuetoA, NightingaleP, GonzalezM, et al. Outcome of mechanically ventilated patients who require a tracheostomy. Crit Care Med, 2005; 33(2):290–298.
7.
PiersonDJ. Tracheostomy and weaning. Respir Care, 2005; 50(4):526–533.
8.
AdlyA, YoussefTA, El-BegermyMM, YounisHM. Timing of tracheostomy in patients with prolonged endotracheal intubation: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2018; 275(3):679–690.
9.
MehtaAB, SyedaSN, BajpayeeL, CookeCR, WalkeyAJ, WienerRS. Trends in tracheostomy for mechanically ventilated patients in the United States, 1993–2012. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015; 192(4):446–454.
10.
FreemanBD, StwalleyD, LambertD, EdlerJ, MorrisPE, MedvedevS, et al. High resource utilization does not affect mortality in acute respiratory failure patients managed with tracheostomy. Respir Care, 2013; 58(11):1863–1872.
11.
HalumSL, TingJY, PlowmanEK, BelafskyPC, HarbargerCF, PostmaGN, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of tracheotomy complications. Laryngoscope, 2012; 122(1):38–45.
12.
ShahRK, LanderL, BerryJG, NussenbaumB, MeratiA, RobersonDW. Tracheotomy outcomes and complications: a national perspective. Laryngoscope, 2012; 122(1):25–29.
13.
MehtaAB, WalkeyAJ, Curran-EverettD, DouglasIS. One-year outcomes following tracheostomy for acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med, 2019; 47(11):1572–1581.
14.
AroraA, HettigeR, IfeachoS, NarulaA. Driving standards in tracheostomy care: a preliminary communication of the St Mary's ENT-led multidisciplinary team approach. Clin Otolaryngol, 2008; 33(6):596–599.
15.
CameronTS, McKinstryA, BurtSK, HowardME, BellomoR, BrownDJ, et al. Outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury before and after introduction of an interdisciplinary tracheostomy team. Crit Care Resusc, 2009; 11(1):14–19.
16.
CettoR, AroraA, HettigeR, NelM, BenjaminL, GomezCMH, et al. Improving tracheostomy care: a prospective study of the multidisciplinary approach. Clin Otolaryngol, 2011; 36(5):482–488.
17.
de MestralC, IqbalS, FongN, LeBlancJ, FataP, RzaekT, KhwajaK. Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients. Can J Surg, 2011; 54(3):167–172.
18.
LeBlancJ, ShultzJR, SeresovaA, de GuiseE, LamoureuxJ, FongN, et al. Outcome in tracheostomized patients with severe traumatic brain injury following implementation of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2010; 25(5):362–365.
19.
NorwoodMGA, SpiersP, BailissJ, SayersRD. Evaluation of the role of a specialist tracheostomy service. From critical care to outreach and beyond. Postgrad Med J, 2004; 80(946):478–480.
20.
ParkerV, GilesM, ShylanG, AustinN, SmithK, MorisonJ, ArcherW. Tracheostomy management in acute care facilities—a matter of teamwork. J Clin Nurs, 2010; 19(9-10):1275–1283.
21.
SodhiK, ShrivastavaA, SinglaMK. Implications of dedicated tracheostomy care nurse program on outcomes. J Anesth, 2014; 28(3):374–380.
22.
TobinAE, SantamariaJD. An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care, 2008; 12(2):R48.
23.
WeltonC, MorrisonM, CataligM, ChrisJ, PatakiJ. Can an interprofessional tracheostomy team improve weaning to decannulation times? A quality improvement evaluation. Can J Respir Ther, 2016; 52(1):7–11.
24.
CliffordC, SpencerA. An evaluation of the impact of a tracheostomy weaning protocol on extubation time. Nurs Crit Care, 2009; 14(3):131–138.
25.
FrankU, MäderM, SticherH. Dysphagic patients with tracheotomies: a multidisciplinary approach to treatment and decannulation management. Dysphagia, 2007; 22(1):20–29.
26.
SmithKA, MatthewsTW, DubéM, SpenceG, DortJC. Changing practice and improving care using a low-risk tracheotomy clinical pathway. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2014; 140(7):630–634.
27.
Thompson-WardE, BootsR, FrisbyJ, BassettL, TimmM. Evaluating suitability for tracheostomy decannulation: a critical evaluation of two management protocols. J Med Speech-Lang Patho, 1999; 7(4):273–281.
28.
WarneckeT, SuntrupS, TeismannIK, HamacherC, OelenbergS, DziewasR. Standardized endoscopic swallowing evaluation for tracheostomy decannulation in critically ill neurologic patients. Crit Care Med, 2013; 41(7):1728–1732.
29.
O'TooleTR, JacobsN, HondorpB, CrawfordL, BoudreauLR, JeffeJ, et al. Prevention of tracheostomy-related hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017; 156(4):642–651.
30.
MahJW, StaffII, FisherSR, ButlerKL. Improving decannulation and swallowing function: a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to post-tracheostomy care. Respir Care, 2017; 62(2):137–143.
31.
FitchK, BernsteinSJ, AguilarMD, BurnandB, LaCalleJR, LazaroP, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 2001.
32.
OspinaMB, MrklasK, DeucharL, RoweBH, LeighR, BhutaniM, SticklandMK. A systematic review of the effectiveness of discharge care bundles for patients with COPD. Thorax, 2017; 72(1):31–39.
33.
KlompasM, LiL, KleinmanK, SzumitaPM, MassaroAF. Associations between ventilator bundle components and outcomes. JAMA Intern Med, 2016; 176(9):1277–1283.
34.
BlackJM, CuddiganJE, WalkoMA, DidierLA, LanderMJ, KelpeMR. Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients. Int Wound J, 2010; 7(5):358–365.
35.
MussaCC, MeksraityteE, LiJ, GulczynskiB, LiuJ, KurucA. Factors associated with endotracheal tube related pressure injury. SM J Nurs, 2018; 4(1):1–6.
36.
SpeedL, HardingKE. Tracheostomy teams reduce total tracheostomy time and increase speaking valve use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care, 2013; 28(2):216.e1–e10.
37.
MitchellRB, HusseyHM, SetzenG, JacobsIN, NussenbaumB, DawsonC, et al. Clinical consensus statement: tracheostomy care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2013; 148(1):6–20.
38.
WellsC, LoshakH. Standardized Hospital Order Sets in Acute Care: A Review of Clinical Evidence, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019.
39.
LaRochéKD, HinksonCR, ThomazinBA, Minton-FoltzPK, CarlbomDJ. Impact of an electronic medical record screening tool and therapist-driven protocol on length of stay and hospital readmission for COPD. Respir Care, 2016; 61(9):1137–1143.
40.
PollackAH, KronmanMP, ZhouC, ZerrDM. Automated screening of hospitalized children for influenza vaccination. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc, 2014; 3(1):7–14.
41.
BlackwoodB, AlderdiceF, BurnsK, CardwellC, LaveryG, O'HalloranP. Use of weaning protocols for reducing duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 2011; 342(jan13 2):c7237.
42.
GundogduI, OzturkEA, UmayE, KaraahmetOZ, UnluE, CakciA. Implementation of a respiratory rehabilitation protocol: weaning from the ventilator and tracheostomy in difficult-to-wean patients with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil, 2017; 39(12):1162–1170.
43.
PryorL, WardE, CornwellP, O'ConnorS, ChapmanM. Patterns of return to oral intake and decannulation post-tracheostomy across clinical populations in an acute inpatient setting. Int J Lang Commun Disord, 2016; 51(5):556–567.
