There is limited evidence on the clinical importance of the endotracheal tube (ETT) size selection in patients with status asthmaticus who require invasive mechanical ventilation. We set out to explore the clinical outcomes of different ETT internal diameter sizes in subjects mechanically ventilated with status asthmaticus.
METHODS:
This was a retrospective study of intubated and non-intubated adults admitted for status asthmaticus between 2014–2021. We examined in-hospital mortality across subgroups with different ETT sizes, as well as non-intubated subjects, using logistic and generalized linear mixed-effects models. We adjusted for demographics, Charlson comorbidities, the first Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, intubating personnel and setting, COVID-19, and the first PaCO2. Finally, we calculated the post-estimation predictions of mortality.
RESULTS:
We enrolled subjects from 964 status asthmaticus admissions. The average age was 46.9 (SD 14.5) y; 63.5% of the encounters were women and 80.6% were Black. Approximately 72% of subjects (690) were not intubated. Twenty-eight percent (275) required endotracheal intubation, of which 3.3% (32) had a 7.0 mm or smaller ETT (ETT ≤ 7 group), 16.5% (159) a 7.5 mm ETT (ETT ≤ 7.5 group), and 8.6% (83) an 8.0 mm or larger ETT (ETT ≥ 8 group). The adjusted mortality was 26.7% (95% CI 13.2–40.2) for the ETT ≤ 7 group versus 14.3% ([(95% CI 6.9–21.7%], P = .04) for ETT ≤ 7.5 group and 11.0% ([95% CI 4.4–17.5], P = .02) for ETT ≥ 8 group, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:
Intubated subjects with status asthmaticus had higher mortality than non-intubated subjects. Intubated subjects had incrementally higher observed mortality with smaller ETT sizes. Physiologic mechanisms can support this dose-response relationship
GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet, 2020; 396:1204-1222.
2.
PetersJI, StupkaJE, SinghH, RossruckerJ, AngelLF, MeloJ, et al. Status asthmaticus in the medical intensive care unit: a 30-year experience. Respir Med, 2012; 106(3):344-348.
3.
AfessaB, MoralesI, CuryJD. Clinical course and outcome of patients admitted to an ICU for status asthmaticus. Chest, 2001; 120(5):1616-1621.
4.
McFaddenER. Acute severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003; 168(7):740-759.
5.
PapirisS, KotanidouA, MalagariK, RoussosC. Clinical review: severe asthma. Crit Care, 2002; 6(1):30-44.
6.
GandhiA, SokhiJ, LockieC, WardPA. Emergency tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19: experience from a UK center. Anesthesiol Res Pract, 2020; 2020:1-9.
7.
Colton HouseJ, NoordzijJP, MurgiaB, LangmoreS. Laryngeal injury from prolonged intubation: a prospective analysis of contributing factors. Laryngoscope, 2011; 121(3):596-600.
8.
ShinnJR, KimuraKS, CampbellBR, Sun LoweryA, WoottenCT, GarrettCG, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute laryngeal injury after prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med, 2019; 47:1699-1706.
9.
VincentJL, de MendonçaA, CantraineF, MorenoR, TakalaJ, SuterPM, et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multi-center, prospective study. Working group on “sepsis-related problems” of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med, 1998; 26(11):1793-1800.
10.
SundararajanV, HendersonT, PerryC, MuggivanA, QuanH, GhaliWA. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol, 2004; 57(12):1288-1294.
11.
QuanH, SundararajanV, HalfonP, FongA, BurnandB, LuthiJ-C, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care, 2005; 43(11):1130-1139.
von ElmE, AltmanDG, EggerM, PocockSJ, GøtzschePC, VandenbrouckeJP. STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med, 2007; 147(8):573-577.
14.
WilliamsR. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal, 2012; 12(2):308-331.
AkinbamiLJ, MoormanJE, BaileyC, ZahranHS, KingM, JohnsonCA, et al. Trends in asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality in the United States. NCHS Data Brief, 2001; 2012(2010):1-8.
17.
KrishnanV, DietteGB, RandCS, BilderbackAL, MerrimanB, HanselNN, et al. Mortality in patients hospitalized for asthma exacerbations in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2006; 174(6):633-638.
18.
LeathermanJ. Mechanical ventilation for severe asthma. Chest, 2015; 147(6):1671-1680.
19.
NanchalR, KumarG, MajumdarT, TanejaA, PatelJ, DagarG, et al. Utilization of mechanical ventilation for asthma exacerbations: analysis of a national database. Respir Care, 2014; 59(5):644-653.
20.
FlevariAG, ManiatisN, KremiotisTE, SiemposI, BetrosianAP, RoussosC, et al. Rohrer’s constant, K2, as a factor of determining inspiratory resistance of common adult endotracheal tubes. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2011; 39(3):410-417.
21.
KimJW, LeeJW, RyuS, ParkJS, YooI, ChoYC, et al. Changes in peak inspiratory flow rate and peak airway pressure with endotracheal tube size during chest compression. World J Emerg Med, 2020; 11(2):97-101.
22.
HoustonJC, NavasquezSD, TrounceJR. A clinical and pathological study of fatal cases of status asthmaticus. Thorax, 1953; 8(3):207-213.
23.
WilsonAM, GrayDM, ThomasJG. Increases in endotracheal tube resistance are unpredictable relative to duration of intubation. Chest, 2009; 136(4):1006-1013.
24.
YoshidaY, TakakuY, NakamotoY, TakayanagiN, YanagisawaT, TakizawaH, et al. Changes in airway diameter and mucus plugs in patients with asthma exacerbation. PLoS One, 2020; 15(2):e0229238.
25.
Al-RawasN, BannerMJ, EulianoNR, TamsCG, BrownJ, MartinAD, et al. Expiratory time constant for determinations of plateau pressure, respiratory system compliance, and total resistance. Crit Care, 2013; 17(1):R23.
26.
PepePE, MariniJJ. Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction: the auto-PEEP effect. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1982; 126(1):166-170.
27.
SofflerMI, HayesMM, SchwartzsteinRM. Respiratory sensations in dynamic hyperinflation: physiological and clinical applications. Respir Care, 2017; 62(9):1212-1223.
28.
O'DonnellDE, LavenezianaP. Physiology and consequences of lung hyperinflation in COPD. European Respiratory Review, 2006; 15(100):61-67.
29.
TakaraLS, CunhaTM, BarbosaP, RodriguesMK, OliveiraMF, NeryLE, NederJA. Dynamics of chest wall volume regulation during constant work rate exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2012; 45(12):1276-1283.
30.
KleinmanBS, FreyK, VanDrunenM, SheikhT, DiPintoD, MasonR, SmithT. Motion of the diaphragm in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease while spontaneously breathing versus during positive pressure breathing after anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology, 2002; 97(2):298-305.
31.
ShehabiY, ChanL, KadimanS, AliasA, IsmailWN, TanMATI, et al. the Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation (SPICE) Study Group investigators. Sedation depth and long-term mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: a prospective longitudinal multi-center cohort study. Intensive Care Med, 2013; 39(5):910-918.
32.
JantzMA, PiersonDJ. Pneumothorax and barotrauma. Clin Chest Med, 1994; 15(1):75-91.
33.
TeboulJ-L, MonnetX, ChemlaD, MichardF. Arterial pulse pressure variation with mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2019; 199(1):22-31.
34.
KhineHH, CorddryDH, KettrickRG, MartinTM, McCloskeyJJ, RoseJB, et al. Comparison of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in young children during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 1997; 86(3):627-631; discussion 27A.
35.
CaoAC, RereddyS, MirzaN. Current practices in endotracheal tube size selection for adults. Laryngoscope, 2020.
36.
MehtaS, HefferMJ, MahamN, NelsonDL, KlingerJR, LevyMM. Impact of endotracheal tube size on preextubation respiratory variables. J Crit Care, 2010; 25(3):483-488.
