COVID-19–related ARDS is characterized by severe hypoxemia with initially preserved lung compliance and impaired ventilation/perfusion (V̇/Q̇) matching. PEEP can increase end-expiratory lung volume, but its effect on V̇/Q̇ mismatch in COVID-19–related ARDS is not clear.
METHODS:
We enrolled intubated and mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS and used the automatic lung parameter estimator (ALPE) to measure V̇/Q̇. Respiratory mechanics measurements, shunt, and V̇/Q̇ mismatch (low V̇/Q̇ and high V̇/Q̇) were collected at 3 PEEP levels (clinical PEEP = intermediate PEEP, low PEEP [clinical − 50%], and high PEEP [clinical + 50%]). A mixed-effect model was used to evaluate the impact of PEEP on V̇/Q̇. We also investigated if PEEP might have a different effect on V̇/Q̇ mismatch in 2 different respiratory mechanics phenotypes, that is, high elastance/low compliance (phenotype H) and low elastance/high compliance (phenotype L).
RESULTS:
Seventeen subjects with COVID-related ARDS age 66 [60–71] y with a PaO2/FIO2 of 141 ± 74 mm Hg were studied at low PEEP = 5.6 ± 2.2 cm H2O, intermediate PEEP = 10.6 ± 3.8 cm H2O, and high PEEP = 15 ± 5 cm H2O. Shunt, low V̇/Q̇, high V̇/Q̇, and alveolar dead space were not significantly influenced, on average, by PEEP. Respiratory system compliance decreased significantly when increasing PEEP without significant variation of PaO2/FIO2 (P = .26). In the 2 phenotypes, PEEP had opposite effects on shunt, with a decrease in the phenotype L and an increase in phenotype H (P = .048).
CONCLUSIONS:
In subjects with COVID-related ARDS placed on invasive mechanical ventilation for > 48 h, PEEP had a heterogeneous effect on V̇/Q̇ mismatch and, on average, higher levels were not able to reduce shunt. The subject’s compliance could influence the effect of PEEP on V̇/Q̇ mismatch since an increased shunt was observed in subjects with lower compliance, whereas the opposite occurred in those with higher compliance.
GattinoniL, CoppolaS, CressoniM, BusanaM, RossiS, ChiumelloD. COVID-19 does not lead to a “Typical” acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020; 201(10):1299-1300.
2.
GattinoniL, PesentiA. The concept of “baby lung.” Intensive Care Med, 2005; 31(6):776-784.
3.
ScaramuzzoG, GamberiniL, TonettiT, ZaniG, OttavianiI, MazzoliCA, et al. The ICU-RER COVID-19 Collaboration. Sustained oxygenation improvement after first prone positioning is associated with liberation from mechanical ventilation and mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a cohort study. Ann Intensive Care, 2021; 11(1):63.
4.
PoschenriederF, MeilerS, LubnowM, ZemanF, RennertJ, ScharfG, et al. Severe COVID-19 pneumonia: perfusion analysis in correlation with pulmonary embolism and vessel enlargement using dual-energy CT data. Plos One, 2021; 16(6):e0252478.
5.
BusanaM, GiosaL, CressoniM, GasperettiA, Di GirolamoL, MartinelliA, et al. The impact of ventilation-perfusion inequality in COVID-19: a computational model. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2021; 130(3):865-876.
6.
HerrmannJ, MoriV, BatesJHT, SukiB. Modeling lung perfusion abnormalities to explain early COVID-19 hypoxemia. Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1):4883.
7.
BallL, RobbaC, MaielloL, HerrmannJ, GerardSE, XinY, et al. GECOVID (GEnoa COVID-19) group. Computed tomography assessment of PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Crit Care, 2021; 25(1):1-10.
8.
SpadaroS, KarbingDS, MauriT, MarangoniE, MojoliF, ValpianiG, et al. Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on pulmonary shunt and dynamic compliance during abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth, 2016; 116(6):855-861.
9.
AmatoMB, BarbasCS, MedeirosDM, Schettino G deP, Lorenzi FilhoG, KairallaRA, et al. Beneficial effects of the “open lung approach” with low distending pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A prospective randomized study on mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1995; 152(6):1835-1846.
10.
FumagalliJ, SantiagoRRS, Teggia DroghiM, ZhangC, FintelmannFJ, TroschelFM, et al. on behalf of the Lung Rescue Team Investigators. Lung recruitment in obese patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology, 2019; 130(5):791-803.
11.
BlankmanP, HasanD, BikkerIG, GommersD. Lung stress and strain calculations in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2016; 60(1):69-78.
12.
GattinoniL, ChiumelloD, CaironiP, BusanaM, RomittiF, BrazziL, et al. COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes?. Intensive Care Med, 2020; 46(6):1099-1102.
13.
ReesSE, KjaergaardS, AndreassenS, HedenstiernaG. Reproduction of MIGET retention and excretion data using a simple mathematical model of gas exchange in lung damage caused by oleic acid infusion. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2006; 101(3):826-832.
14.
ReesSE, KjaergaardS, AndreassenS, HedenstiernaG. Reproduction of inert gas and oxygenation data: a comparison of the MIGET and a simple model of pulmonary gas exchange. Intensive Care Med, 2010; 36(12):2117-2124.
15.
KarbingDS, PanigadaM, BottinoN, SpinelliE, ProttiA, ReesSE, et al. Changes in shunt, ventilation/perfusion mismatch, and lung aeration with PEEP in patients with ARDS: a prospective single-arm interventional study. Crit Care, 2020; 24(1):1-13.
16.
RanieriVM, RubenfeldGD, ThompsonBT, FergusonND, CaldwellE, FanE, et al. ARDS Definition Task Force. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA, 2012; 307(23):2526-2533.
17.
SinhaP, CalfeeCS, BeitlerJR, SoniN, HoK, MatthayMA, et al. Physiologic analysis and clinical performance of the ventilatory ratio in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2019; 199(3):333-341.
18.
GattinoniL, BrazziL, PelosiP, LatiniR, TognoniG, PesentiA, et al. A trial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med, 1995; 333(16):1025-1032.
19.
KarbingDS, KjærgaardS, AndreassenS, EspersenK, ReesSE. Minimal model quantification of pulmonary gas exchange in intensive care patients. Med Eng Phys, 2011; 33(2):240-248.
20.
SpadaroS, GrassoS, KarbingDS, FogagnoloA, ContoliM, BolliniG, et al. Physiologic evaluation of ventilation/perfusion mismatch and respiratory mechanics at different positive end-expiratory pressure in patients undergoing protective one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology, 2018; 128(3):531-538.
21.
KjaergaardS, ReesS, MalczynskiJ, NielsenJA, ThorgaardP, ToftE, et al. Noninvasive estimation of shunt and ventilation/perfusion mismatch. Intensive Care Med, 2003; 29(5):727-734.
22.
KjaergaardS, ReesSE, GrønlundJ, NielsenEM, LambertP, ThorgaardP, et al. Hypoxemia after cardiac surgery: clinical application of a model of pulmonary gas exchange. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2004; 21(4):296-301.
23.
BourgoinP, BaudinF, BrossierD, EmeriaudG, WysockiM, JouvetP. Assessment of Bohr and Enghoff dead-space equations in mechanically ventilated children. Respir Care, 2017; 62(4):468-474.
24.
ChiumelloD, MarinoA, BrioniM, CigadaI, MengaF, ColomboA, et al. Lung recruitment assessed by respiratory mechanics and computed tomography in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. What is the relationship?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2016; 193(11):1254-1263.
25.
ChiumelloD, BonifaziM, PozziT, FormentiP, PapaGFS, ZuanettiG, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: the heterogeneous effects. Crit Care, 2021; 25(1):431.
26.
SpadaroS, MauriT, BöhmSH, ScaramuzzoG, TurriniC, WaldmannAD, et al. Variation of poorly ventilated lung units (silent spaces) measured by electrical impedance tomography to dynamically assess recruitment. Crit Care, 2018; 22(1):26.
27.
MauriT, SpinelliE, ScottiE, ColussiG, BasileMC, CrottiS, et al. Potential for lung recruitment and ventilation/perfusion mismatch in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome from Coronavirus Disease 2019. Crit Care Med, 2020; 48(8):1129-1134.
28.
HedenstiernaG, ChenL, HedenstiernaM, ScaramuzzoG. Treatment of COVID-19 by inhaled NO to reduce shunt?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020; 202(4):618-618.
29.
ReynoldsAS, LeeAG, RenzJ, DeSantisK, LiangJ, PowellCA, et al. Pulmonary vascular dilatation detected by automated transcranial Doppler in COVID-19 pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020; 202(7):1037-1039.
30.
DalpiazG, GamberiniL, CarnevaleA, SpadaroS, MazzoliCA, PiciucchiS, et al. Clinical implications of microvascular CT scan signs in COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Radiol Med, 2022; 127(2):162-173.
31.
McFadyenJD, StevensH, PeterK. The emerging threat of (micro)thrombosis in COVID-19 and its therapeutic implications. Circ Res, 2020; 127(4):571-587.
32.
StaviD, GoffiA, Al ShalabiM, PirainoT, ChenL, JacksonR, et al. The pressure paradox: abdominal compression to detect lung hyperinflation in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2022; 205(2):245-247.
33.
KummerRL, ShapiroRS, MariniJJ, HuelsterJS, LeathermanJW. Paradoxically improved respiratory compliance with abdominal compression in COVID-19 ARDS. Chest, 2021; 160(5):1739-1742.
34.
BosLDJ, SinhaP, DicksonRP. Response to “COVID-19 conundrum: clinical phenotyping based on pathophysiology as a promising approach to guide therapy in a novel illness” and “Strengthening the foundation of the house of CARDS by phenotyping on the fly” and “COVID-19 phenotypes: leading or misleading?”. European Respiratory Journal, 2020.
35.
GattinoniL, CamporotaL, MariniJJ. COVID-19 phenotypes: leading or misleading?. Eur Respir J, 2020; 56(2):2002195.
36.
BallL, Serpa NetoA, TrifilettiV, MandelliM, FirpoI, RobbaC, et al. PROVE Network: PROtective Ventilation Network. Effects of higher PEEP and recruitment maneuvers on mortality in patients with ARDS: a systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression, and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Intensive Care Med Exp, 2020; 8(Suppl 1):39.
37.
PelosiP, RoccoPRM, Gama de AbreuM. Close down the lungs and keep them resting to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury. Crit Care, 2018; 22(1).
38.
WestJB, DolleryCT, NaimarkA. Distribution of blood flow in isolated lung; relation to vascular and alveolar pressures. J Appl Physiol, 1964; 19:713-724.
39.
LangerT, BrioniM, GuzzardellaA, CarlessoE, CabriniL, CastelliG, et al. PRONA-COVID Group. Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multi-centric study of more than 1,000 patients. Crit Care, 2021; 25(1):1-11.
40.
LaghlamD, RahoualG, MalvyJ, EstagnasiéP, BrussetA, SquaraP. Use of almitrine and inhaled nitric oxide in ARDS due to COVID-19. Front Med, 2021; 8:918.
41.
PelosiP, BallL, BarbasCSV, BellomoR, BurnsKEA, EinavS, et al. Personalized mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care, 2021; 25(1):250.
42.
BertelliM, FusinaF, PreziosoC, CavalloE, NenciniN, CrisciS, et al. COVID-19 ARDS is characterized by increased dead-space ventilation compared With non–COVID-19–related ARDS. Respir Care, 2021; 66(9):1406-1415.
43.
PotusF, MaiV, LebretM, MalenfantS, Breton-GagnonE, LajoieAC, et al. Novel insights on the pulmonary vascular consequences of COVID-19. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2020; 319(2):L277-L288.
44.
MichalskiJE, KurcheJS, SchwartzDA. From ARDS to pulmonary fibrosis: the next phase of the COVID-19 pandemic?. Transl Res, 2022; 241:13-24.
45.
ProttiA, SantiniA, PennatiF, et al. Lung response to a higher positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Chest, 2022; 161(4):979-988.
46.
CavalcantiAB, SuzumuraÉA, LaranjeiraLN, Paisani D deM, DamianiLP, GuimarãesHP, et al. Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators. Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2017; 318(14):1335.
47.
SpadaroS, KarbingDS, Dalla CorteF, MauriT, MoroF, GioiaA, et al. An open-loop, physiological model–based decision support system can reduce pressure support while acting to preserve respiratory muscle function. J Crit Care, 2018; 48:407-413.
48.
CaravitaS, BarattoC, Di MarcoF, CalabreseA, BalestrieriG, RussoF, et al. Hemodynamic characteristics of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation. An invasive assessment using right heart catheterization. Eur J Heart Fail, 2020; 22(12):2228-2237.
49.
DantzkerDR, LynchJP, WegJG. Depression of cardiac output is a mechanism of shunt reduction in the therapy of acute respiratory failure. Chest, 1980; 77(5):636-642.
