Influence of Nebulizer Type,Position,and Bias Flow on Aerosol Drug Delivery in Simulated Pediatric and Adult Lung Models During Mechanical Ventilation

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The effectiveness of aerosol drug delivery during mechanical ventilation is influenced by the patient, ventilator, and nebulizer variables. The impact of nebulizer type, position on the ventilator circuit, and bias flow on aerosol drug delivery has not been established for different age populations.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the influence of nebulizer position and bias flow with a jet nebulizer and a vibrating-mesh nebulizer on aerosol drug delivery in simulated and mechanically ventilated pediatric and adult patients.

METHOD:

Albuterol sulfate (2.5 mg) was nebulized with a jet nebulizer and a vibrating-mesh nebulizer, using simulated pediatric and adult lung models. The 2 nebulizer positions were: (1) jet nebulizer placed 15 cm from the Y-piece adapter, and vibrating-mesh nebulizer attached directly to the Y-piece; and (2) jet nebulizer placed prior to the heated humidifier with 15 cm of large-bore tubing, and vibrating-mesh nebulizer positioned at an inlet to the humidifier. A ventilator with a heated humidifier and ventilator circuit was utilized in both lung models. The adult ventilator settings were V_T 500 mL, PEEP 5 cm H₂O, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, peak inspiratory flow 60 L/min, and descending ramp flow waveform. The pediatric ventilator settings were V_T 100 mL, PEEP 5 cm H₂O, respiratory rate 20 breaths/min, inspiratory time 1 s. We tested bias flows of 2 and 5 L/min. The adult and pediatric lung models used 8-mm and 5-mm inner-diameter endotracheal tubes, respectively. Each experiment was run 3 times (n = 3). The albuterol sulfate was eluted from the filter and analyzed via spectrophotometry (276 nm).

RESULTS:

Nebulizer placement prior to the humidifier increased drug delivery with both the jet nebulizer and the vibrating-mesh nebulizer, with a greater increase with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer. Higher bias flow reduced drug delivery. Drug delivery with the vibrating-mesh nebulizer was 2–4-fold greater than with the jet nebulizer at all positions (P < .05) in both lung models.

CONCLUSION:

During simulated mechanical ventilation in pediatric and adult models, bias flow and nebulizer type and position impact aerosol drug delivery.

Keywords

jet nebulizer vibrating-mesh nebulizer bias flow nebulizer position mechanical ventilation drug administration aerosol drug delivery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Terzano

, Allegra

. Importance of drug delivery system in steroid aerosol therapy via nebulizer. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 2002; 15(5):449–454.

Dhand

. Aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation: getting ready for prime time. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003; 168(10):1148–1149.

Miller

, Amin

, Palmer

, Shah

, Smaldone

. Aerosol delivery and modern mechanical ventilation: in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003; 168(10):1205–1209.

Kendrick

, Smith

, Wilson

. Selecting and using nebulizer equipment. Thorax, 1997; 52(Suppl 2):92–101.

Pedersen

, Handlos

, Heslet

, Kristensen

. Factors influencing the in vitro deposition of tobramycin aerosol: a comparison of an ultrasonic nebulizer and a high frequency vibrating mesh nebulizer. J Aerosol Med, 2006; 19(2):175–183.

McPeck

, Tandon

, Hughes

, Smaldone

. Aerosol delivery during continuous nebulization. Chest, 1997; 111(5):1200–1205.

Hughes

, Saez

. Effectsof nebulizer mode and position in a mechanical ventilator circuit on dose efficiency. Respir Care, 1987; 32(12):1131–1135.

Quinn

. Effect of a new nebulizer position on aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care, 1992; 37(5):423–431.

O'Doherty

, Thomas

, Page

, Treacher

, Nunan

. Delivery of a nebulized aerosol to a lung model during mechanical ventilation: effect of ventilator settings and nebulizer type, position, and volume of fill. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1992; 146(2):383–388.

10.

Thomas

, O'Doherty

, Page

, Treacher

, Nunan

. Delivery of ultrasonic nebulized aerosols to a lung model during mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1993; 148(4):872–877.

11.

Ari

, Areabi

, Sampson

. Evaluation of position of aerosol device in two different ventilator circuits during mechanical ventilation (abstract). Respir Care, 2007; 52(11):1580.

12.

Hess

, Fisher

, Williams

, Pooler

, Kacmarek

. Medication nebulizer performance. Effects of diluent volume, nebulizer flow, and nebulizer brand. Chest, 1996; 110(2):498–505.

13.

O'Riordan

, Greco

, Perry

, Smaldone

. Nebulizer function during mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1992; 145(5):1117–1122.

14.

Di Paolo

, Pannatier

, Cotting

. In vitro evaluation of bronchodilator drug delivery by jet nebulization during pediatric mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2005; 6(4):462–469.

15.

Zhang

, David

, Wiedmann

. Performance of the vibrating membrane aerosol generation device: Aeroneb Micropump nebulizer. J Aerosol Med, 2007; 20(4):408–416.

16.

Thomas

, O'Doherty

, Fidler

, Page

, Treacher

, Nunan

. Pulmonary deposition of a nebulised aerosol during mechanical ventilation. Thorax, 1993; 48(2):154–159.

17.

Dolovich

. Influence of inspiratory flow rate, particle size, and airway caliber on aerosolized drug delivery to the lung. Respir Care, 2000; 45(6):597–608.

18.

Ari

, Hess

, Myers

, Rau

. A guide to aerosol delivery devices for respiratory therapists. Dallas, Texas: American Association for Respiratory Care; 2009.

19.

Fink

, Dhand

, Grychowski

, Fahey

, Tobin

. Reconciling in vitro and in vivo measurements of aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation and defining efficiency-enhancing factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999; 159(1):63–68.

20.

Everard

. Inhalation therapy for infants. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2003; 55(7):869–878.

21.

Everard

. Inhaler devices in infants and children: challenges and solutions. J Aerosol Med, 2004; 17(2):186–195.

22.

Everard

. Aerosol delivery to children. Pediatr Ann, 2006; 35(9):630–636.

23.

Ahrens

. The role of the MDI and DPI in pediatric patients: “children are not just miniature adults”. Respir Care, 2005; 50(10):1323–1328.

24.

Bisgaard

. Delivery of inhaled medication to children. J Asthma, 1997; 34(6):443–467.

25.

Fink

. Aerosol delivery to ventilated infants and pediatric patients. Respir Care, 2004; 49(6):653–665.

26.

Fink

. Humidity and aerosol therapy. In: Mosby's Respiratory Care Equipment. St Louis: Mosby-Elsevier; 2010:91–140.

27.

Fink

. Aerosol drug therapy. In: Egan's Fundamentals of Respiratory Care, 9th edition. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009:801–842.

28.

Dhand

. Nebulizers that use a vibrating mesh or plate with multiple apertures to generate aerosol. Respir Care, 2002; 47(12):1406–1416.

29.

Moraine

, Truflandier

, Vandenbergen

, Berre

, Melot

, Vincent

. Placement of the nebulizer before the humidifier during mechanical ventilation: effect on aerosol delivery. Heart Lung, 2009; 38(5):435–439.

30.

Rhame

, Streifel

, McComb

. Bubbling humidifiers produce microaerosols which can carry bacteria. Infection Control, 1986; 7(8):403–407.