A Study of Reward Preference in Taiwanese Gifted and Nongifted Students with Differential Locus of Control

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether gifted and nongifted students' preferences for different types of reward were affected by differential locus of control. In total, 181 gifted and 107 nongifted junior high school students in Taiwan participated. The Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale was used as a measure of locus of control. A survey of reward preference was designed to look at students' evaluations of the reward systems. The results showed that the gifted students tended to evaluate competition rewards significantly higher when compared to the nongifted students; the nongifted students tended to evaluate chance rewards significantly higher than the gifted students. However, there was no significant difference between the gifted students and nongifted students in their evaluation of performance rewards. An interaction effect between ability and locus of control for chance rewards indicated that the nongifted/moderate and nongifted/external students preferred chance rewards more than the other groups. Irrespective of ability level, however, the findings indicated that the higher the internality, the higher were the students' preferences for the contingent (competition and performance) rewards.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carlson

N. R.

(1993). Psychology: The science of behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon

Findley

M. J.

Cooper

H. M.

(1983). Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 419–427

Hair

J. F.

Jr. Anderson

R. E.

Tatham

R. L.

Black

W. C.

(1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International

Kalechstein

Nowicki

Jr. (1997). A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between control expectancies and academic achievement: An 11-year follow-up to Findley and Cooper. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 29–56

Klein

S. B.

Mowrer

R. R.

(Eds.). (1989). Contemporary learning theories: Instrumental conditioning theory and the impact of biological constraints on learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Krampen

Wieberg

H.-J. W.

(1981). Three aspects of locus of control in German, American, and Japanese university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 133–134

Kren

(1992). The moderating effects of locus of control on performance incentives and participation. Human Relations, 42, 991–1012

Laffoon

K. S.

Jenkins-Friedman

Tollefson

(1989). Causal attributions of underachieving gifted, achieving gifted, and nongifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 4–21

S. C. Wu.

(2005). The interaction between academic ability, locus of control and reward contingency. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 65(7–A), 2478

10.

McClelland

Yewchuk

Mulcahy

(1991). Locus of control in underachieving and achieving gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 380–392

11.

Moran

J. D.

Lion

E. Y.

(1982). Effects of reward on creativity in college students of two levels of ability. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 54, 43–48

12.

Nowicki

Jr. Strickland

B. R.

(1973). A locus of control scale for children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 148–154

13.

Powers

Douglas

(1983). Attributions for success and failure of academically gifted high school students. Psychological Reports, 53, 597–598

14.

Rotter

J. B.

(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1, Whole No. 609)

15.

Ryan

R. M.

Mims

Koestner

(1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 736–750

16.

Skinner

B. F.

(1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf

17.

Thorndike

E. L.

(1905). The elements of psychology. New York: Seiler

18.

Trusty

M. L.

Macan

T. H.

(1995). Personal control: Effects of reward contingency and locus of control. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10, 201–214

19.

Van Boxtel

H. W.

Mönks

F. J.

(1992). General, social, and academic self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 169–186

20.

Winefield

A. H.

Barnett

J. A.

Tiggemann

(1984). Learned helplessness and IQ differences. Personality & Individual Differences, 5, 493–500

21.

Wolf

M. M.

(1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement on how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214