Actor-Network Theory and Methodology: Social Research in a More-Than-Human World

Abstract

This article explores the methodological implications of actor-network theory for social research. Pointing to an increasing awareness of ANT in sociological discourse, but assuming that it is more widely known than well understood, the article outlines some of the key features of ANT as an approach to social life, before addressing the tricky question of how these ideas translate into methodological practice. The possibilities of the approach are illustrated by reference to the author's own ANT-inspired historical research on the socio-material history of dairy milk in the UK, which is used as a point of reference and an example throughout. Particular attention is given to the practical method deployed in the milk study, namely documentary historiography, leading to a critical exploration of the use of ANT in the analysis of historical texts. This involves considering the nature of the relationship between texts and lived practices, and drawing out how ANT offers a distinctive way of seeing texts which challenges the standard ethnographic view of texts and fundamentally transforms the issue. Given that documentary historiography is not a method strongly associated with actor-network theory because it raises considerable methodological dilemmas, this provides one particular account of how such dilemmas can be managed or overcome. Social researchers interested in the potential of actor-network theory should be able to draw upon this in exploring the possibilities of the approach for their own work.

Keywords

Actor-network theory Methodology Hybrids Heterogeneity Nonhuman Agency Relational Ontology Texts Practices Historiography

References

Adams

(1990) The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist Vegetarian Critical Theory, Continuum, New York.

Althusser

(2005 [1965]) For Marx, Verso, London.

Atkins

(2010) Liquid Materialities: A History of Milk, Science and the Law, Ashgate, Farnham.

Berger

, and Luckmann

(1991 [1966]) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Penguin, London.

Bourdieu

(1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bryman

(2004) Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Callon

(1986) ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay’, in Law

(Eds) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, Sociological Review Monograph, Routledge:London.

Callon

(2002) ‘Writing and (Re)writing Devices as Tools for Managing Complexity’, in Law

and Mol

(Eds) Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge-Practices, Duke University Press:Durham and London.

Chaudhuri

Katz

and Perry

M. E.

(2010) ‘Introduction’, in Chaudhuri

Katz

and Perry

M. E.

(eds) Contesting Archives: Finding Women in the Sources, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.

10.

Derrida

(1997 [1974]) Of Grammatology, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

11.

Geertz

(1974) ‘“From the Native's Point of View”: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding’, Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 28, 1: 26–45.

12.

Giddens

(1986) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Polity Press, Oxford.

13.

Hodder

(2000) ‘The Interpretation of Documents and Material Culture’, in Denzin

and Lincoln

(Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, second edition, Sage: London.

14.

Jenkins

(1970) Drinka Pinta: The Story of Milk and the Industry that Serves It, Heinemann, London.

15.

Knappett

, and Malafouris

(2008) Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach, Springer, New York.

16.

Latour

, and Woolgar

(1986 [1979]) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

17.

Latour

(1988) The Pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass and London.

18.

Latour

(1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Pearson, Harlow.

19.

Latour

(1999a) ‘On Recalling ANT’, in Law

and Hassard

(Eds) Actor-Network Theory and After, Sociological Review Monographs, Wiley-Blackwell: London.

20.

Latour

(1999b) Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, Harvard University Press, Harvard Mass and London.

21.

Latour

(2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

22.

Law

(2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, Routledge, Abingdon and New York.

23.

Lorimer

(2010) ‘Moving Image Methodologies for More-Than-Human Geographies’, Progress in Human Geography, 34 (1) 237–258.

24.

May

(1997) Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process, Open University Press, Buckingham.

25.

McNaghten

, and Urry

(1998) Contested Natures, Sage, London.

26.

Michael

(2000) Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity, Routledge, London.

27.

Mol

(1998) ‘Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions’, The Sociological Review, (46) 74–89.

28.

Mol

(2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Duke University Press, Durham and London.

29.

Nimmo

(2010) Milk, Modernity and the Making of the Human: Purifying the Social, Routledge, London and New York.

30.

Pickering

(1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

31.

Prior

(2008) ‘Repositioning Documents in Social Research’, Sociology, 42, (5): 857–72.

32.

Ryle

(2009 [1949]) The Concept of Mind, Routledge, Abingdon and New York.

33.

Sharrock

(2010) ‘The Production and Reproduction of Social Order: Is Structuration a Solution?’, in Martin

and Dennis

(Eds) Human Agents and Social Structures, Manchester University Press: Manchester and New York.

34.

Stengers

(2010) Cosmopolitics I, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

35.

Whatmore

(2006) ‘Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography In and For a More-Than-Human World’, Cultural Geographies, 13(4) 600–609.

36.

Woolgar

(1988) ‘Reflexivity is the Ethnographer of the Text’, in Woolgar

(Eds) Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge.