This paper evaluates audits and feedback as methods to increase implementation of evidence in stroke rehabilitation.
Method:
The study used an action research approach and theories of knowledge translation. A sample of 22 occupational therapists participated from two Danish hospitals that admitted stroke patients. Data collection methods included audits of occupational therapy medical records, documentations of daily practice, and collaborative discussions. Active feedback and discussions of the findings took place, at a group level in four local clinical audits. Data analysis of daily self-reported recordings and audits was descriptive. Audit data were analysed using descriptive statistics. A phenomenological hermeneutical interpretive methodology was used for analysing qualitative data.
Findings:
Audits and feedback were based on clear standards and contextual developing action plans. Daily practice in both settings adapted to the clinical guidelines. Implementations of the standardized assessment tools seemed to be the most successful.
Conclusion:
The effects of audit and feedback profited from the active participation of the therapists, as well as local gatekeepers having formal responsibilities for implementing change. The process was strengthened by providing the audits and feedback more than once. The effect of audits and feedback was positively influenced by being in line with current conceptual frameworks, local policies, and values.
BennettSBennettJ (2000) The process of evidence-based practice in occupational therapy: informing clinical decisions. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 47 (4), 171–180.
2.
BlomhøjGMainzJ (2000) Audit. A method for quality development in clinical practice. Clarification Report nr. 9. Ugeskrift for Læger.
3.
BowmanJLlewellynG (2002) Clinical outcomes research from the occupational therapist's perspective. Occupational Therapy International, 9 (2), 145–166.
4.
BrehautJCEvaKW (2012) Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: use the entire menu of constructs. Implementation Science, 7, 114.
5.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1997) Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications, ACE.
6.
CloustonTJWhitcombeSW (2008) The professionalisation of occupational therapy: a continuing challenge. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71 (8), 314–320.
7.
CorcoranM (2006) Dissemination or knowledge translation?American Journal of Occupation Therapy, 60 (5), 487–488.
8.
CusickAMcCluskeyA (2000) Becoming an evidence-based practitioner through professional development. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 47 (4), 159–170.
9.
DreyerPSPedersenBD (2009) Distanciation in Ricoeur's theory of interpretation: narrations in a study of life experiences of living with chronic illness and home mechanical ventilation. Nursing Inquiry, 16 (1), 64–73.
10.
FinlaysonMShevilEMathiowetzVMatuskaK (2005) Reflections of occupational therapists working as members of a research team. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52 (2), 101–108.
11.
FisherAG (1998) Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture: Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. American Journal of Occupation Therapy, 52 (7), 509–521.
12.
ForsythKMannL SummerfieldKielhofnerG (2005) Scholarship of practice: making occupation-focused, theory-driven, evidence-based practice a reality. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68 (6), 261–268.
IvanoffSDHultbergJ (2006) Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13 (2), 125–132.
17.
IversNJamtvedtGFlottorpSYoungJMOdgaard-JensenJFrenchSDOxmanAD (2012) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 6 Art. No: CD000259. doi:10.1002/14651858.
18.
JamtvedtGYoungJMKristoffersenDTO'BrianMAOxmanAD (2006) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 2 Art. No: CD000259.
KielhofnerG (2005) Scholarship and practice: bridging the divide. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59 (2), 231–239.
21.
KielhofnerG (1997) Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. 2nd ed.Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company.
22.
KristensenHKBorgTHounsgaardL (2012) Aspects affecting occupational therapists' reasoning when implementing research-based evidence in stroke rehabilitation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19 (2), 118–131.
23.
KristensenHKBorgTHounsgaardL (2011a) Facilitation of research-based evidence within occupational therapy in stroke rehabilitation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74 (10), 473–483.
24.
KristensenHKPerssonDNygrenCBollMMatzenP (2011b) Evaluation of evidence within occupational therapy in stroke patients. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18 (1), 11–25.
25.
MainzJBlomhøjG (2011), Audit — en metode til kvalitetsudvikling i sundhedsvæsenet (Audit — a method for quality development). In: JørgensenTMainzJRosenbergR, eds. Psychiatry, research, evaluation of technology and quality. Munksgaard.
26.
MattinglyCFlemingMH (1994) Clinical reasoning: forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company.
27.
McCormackBKitsonAHarveyGRycroft-MaloneJTitchenASeersK (2002) Getting evidence into practice: the meaning of ‘context’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38 (1), 94–104.
28.
RicoeurP (1976) Interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.
29.
Rycroft-MaloneJSeersKTitchenAHarveyGKitsonAMcCormackB (2004) What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47 (1), 81–90.
30.
StrausSETetroeJMGrahamID (2009) Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64 (1), 6–10.
31.
TaylorRRSuarez-BalcazarYForsythKKielhofnerG (2006) Participatory research in occupational therapy. In: KielhofnerG, ed. Research in occupational therapy: methods of inquiry for enhancing practice. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company. 452–468.
32.
Tickle-DegnenLBedellG (2003) Heterarchy and hierarchy: a critical appraisal of the “levels of evidence” as a tool for clinical decision making. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57 (2), 234–237.
33.
TitchenAErsserSJ (2001) The nature of professional craft knowledge. In: HiggsJTitchenA, eds. Practice knowledge & expertise in the health professions. Butterworth-Heinemann. 35–42.
34.
TownsendEAPolatajkoHJ (2007) Enabling Occupation II:. advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation. Ottowa, ON: CAOT Publications, ACE.
35.
WelchADawsonP (2006) Closing the gap: collaborative learning as a strategy to embed evidence within occupational therapy practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12 (2), 227–238.
36.
WildingCWhitefordG (2008) Language, identity and representation: occupation and occupational therapy in acute settings. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55 (3), 180–187.
