Worksite Policies and Environments Supporting Physical Activity in Midwestern Communities

Abstract

Purpose.

To examine the association of worksite policies and environments to physical activity.

Methods.

Between 2001 and 2003, 977 adults from Missouri, Tennessee, and Arkansas participated in two random-digit-dialed telephone surveys regarding physical activity behaviors and worksite policies supporting physical activity. Logistic regression was used to investigate relationships between meeting national physical activity recommendations and supportive policies or environmental conditions (e.g., facilities, equipment, financial rewards) at worksites.

Results.

Having multiple policies at worksites was associated with meeting physical activity recommendations, specifically the provision of accessible stairways and personal services (e.g., fitness testing counseling). Meeting recommendations through walking was associated with having exercise facilities (e.g., gym, shower) and equipment (e.g., treadmill, weights).

Discussion.

This study highlights the importance of supplementing health promotion information in workplaces with policies and environmental interventions. Particular consideration should be given to accessible stairways for onsite exercise and provision of exercise facilities and equipment. Future interventions should combine policy change with program delivery.

Keywords

Environment Motivation Physical Activity Policy Workplace Manuscript format: research Research purpose: modeling/relationship testing Study design: nonexperimental Outcome measure: behavioral Setting: workplace Health focus: fitness/physical activity Strategy: built environment policy Target population age: adults Target population circumstances: geographic location

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pelletier

. A review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: Update VI 2000–2004. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47:1051–1058.

Aldana

. Financial impact of health promotion programs: A comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Health Promot. 2001;15:296–320.

Brownson

Hagood

Lovegreen

, A multilevel ecological approach to promoting walking in rural communities. Prev Med. 2005;41:837–842.

Brownson

Smith

Pratt

, Preventing cardiovascular disease through community-based risk reduction: The Bootheel Heart Health Project. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:206–213.

Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Missouri Information for Community Assessment. Available at: http://www.dhss.mo.gov/MICA/. Accessed December 1, 2006.

Gentry

Kalsbeek

Hogelin

, The behavioral risk factor surveys: II—design, methods, and estimates from combined state data. Am J Prev Med. 1985;1:9–14.

Brownson

Chang

Eyler

, Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: A comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:473–483.

Pate

Pratt

Blair

, Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995;273:402–407.

Mantel

Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963;58:690–700.

10.

Matson-Koffman

Brownstein

Neiner

Greaney

. A site-specific literature review of policy and environmental interventions that promote physical activity and nutrition for cardiovascular health: What works? Am J Health Promot. 2005;19:167–193.

11.

Kahn

Ramsey

Brownson

, The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:S73–S107.

12.

Lucove

Huston

Evenson

. Workers’ perceptions about worksite policies and environments and their association with leisure-time physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2007;21:196–200.