Preventive and Reproductive Health Services for Women: The Role of California's Family Planning Waiver

Abstract

Purpose.

Examine effects of a Medicaid family planning waiver on the receipt of reproductive health care and pregnancy.

Design.

The present study uses a quasiexperimental design using data from the California Women's Health Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for exposure and comparison groups, before and after California's Planning Access Care and Treatment waiver.

Setting.

The setting was California and comparison states.

Subjects.

The study included women who were ages 18 to 44 years and below 200% of the federal poverty level (FPL), who are eligible for services under the waiver.

Measures.

The study measured self-reported pregnancy and receipt of routine checkup, clinical breast exam, Pap test, Chlamydia screening, and discussion of birth control with provider in the past year.

Analysis.

The study analyzes outcomes for exposure and comparison groups using probit regression models based on data both within California and in states without waivers.

Results.

Estimates from the California Women's Health Survey analysis indicate that among parents 100% to 200% of the FPL, the waiver led to an 8–percentage point increase in the receipt of a routine checkup and a 12–percentage point increase (p = .03) in discussion of birth control. There was an estimated 3–percentage point decline (p = .05) in current pregnancies among nulliparous women. Multistate analysis using the BRFSS confirmed positive effects on routine checkups (p < .01).

Conclusions.

The waiver appears to have led to a reduction in pregnancy rates and increased receipt of reproductive health care, particularly routine checkups.

Keywords

Medicaid Policy Routine Checkup Screening Pregnancy Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: multivariate analyses Study design: quasiexperimental Outcome measure: behavioral Setting: state Health focus: reproductive health care Strategy: policy/access change Target population age: teens and adults Target population circumstances: income level,state

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Johnson

Posner

Biermann

. Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care—United States: A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55:1–23.

Ranji

Salganicoff

. Women's Health Care Chartbook: Key Findings from the Kaiser Women's Health Survey. Washington, DC: Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation; 2011.

Halpern

Ward

Pavluck

. Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: A retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:222–231.

Maciosek

Coffield

Edwards

. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services, results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31:52–61.

Finer

Zolna

. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011;84:478–485.

Alan Guttmacher Institute. Women of reproductive age hit hard by recession, new census data show. Washington, DC: Guttmacher Institute Media Center; 2010. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2010/09/17/index.html. Accessed September 17, 2012.

Kaiser Family Foundation. Focus on health reform, fact sheet: Preventive services covered by private health plans under the Affordable Care Act. Washington, DC: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2011. Available at: http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8219.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2012.

Institute of Medicine. Clinical Preventive Services for Women, Closing the Gaps. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 2011.

US Dept of Health and Human Services. Background: The Affordable Care Act's new rules on preventive care. Available at: http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2010/07/preventive-care-background.html. Accessed September 17, 2012.

10.

Guttmacher Institute. State policies in brief: Medicaid family planning eligibility expansions. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_SMFPE.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2012.

11.

Kearney

Levine

. Subsidized contraception, fertility, and sexual behavior. Rev Econ Stat. 2009;91:137–151.

12.

Lindrooth

McCullough

. The effect of Medicaid family planning expansions on unplanned births. Women's Health Issues 2007;17:66–74.

13.

Adams

Kenney

Galactionova

. Medicaid family planning waivers in the U.S.: The Arkansas experience. Draft paper. Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; 2007. Unpublished data.

14.

Adams

Kenney

Galactionova

. Medicaid family planning waivers in three states: Do they reduce unwanted births? Health Serv Res. Under revision.

15.

California Dept of Public Health. California Women's Health Survey. Available at: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/surveys/Pages/CWHS.aspx. Accessed September 30, 2011.

16.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/. Accessed September 30, 2011.

17.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS) State Summary Datamarts. Available at: http://msis.cms.hhs.gov/. Accessed November 17, 2009.

18.

Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health. Family PACT program report fiscal year 2008–2009. Available at: http://www.familypact.org/Files/Provider/Research%20Reports/FamPACT_AnnualReport_FY0809_2010-0901.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2012.

19.

Office of Population Affairs. Program guidelines for project grants for family planning services. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/opa/pdfs/2001-ofp-guidelines-complete.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2012.

20.

Kaestner

Kaushal

. Welfare reform and health insurance coverage of low-income families. J Health Econ. 2003;22:959–981.

21.

Kenney

Sommers

Dubay

. Moving to mandatory Medicaid managed care in Ohio: Impacts for pregnant women and infants. Med Care. 2005;43:683–690.

22.

Adams

Gavin

Manning

Handler

. Welfare reform, insurance coverage pre-pregnancy and timely enrollment: An eight state study. Inquiry. 2005;42:129–144.

23.

Dubay

Joyce

Kaestner

Kenney

. Changes in prenatal care timing and low birth weight by race and socioeconomic status: Implications for the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women. Health Serv Res. 2001;36:399–403.

24.

Ashenfelter

Card

. Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effects of training programs. Rev Econ Stat. 1985;67:648–660.

25.

Wooldridge

. Lecture 10: Difference-indifferences estimation. Available at: http://www.nber.org/WNE/Slides7-31-07/slides_10_diffindiffs.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2012.

26.

Rubin

. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:757–763.

27.

Becker

Ichino

. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata J. 2002;2:358–377.

28.

Dehejia

Wahba

. Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental casual studies. Rev Econ Stat. 2002;84:151–161.

29.

Lee

. Propensity score matching and variations of the balancing test [published online ahead of print May 27, 2011]. Empir Econ. doi:10.1007/s00181-011-0481-0.

30.

StataCorp. Stata statistical software: Release 11. College Station, Tex: StataCorp LP; 2009.

31.

StataCorp. Stata 11 base reference manual. College Station, Tex: Stata Press; 2009.

32.

Karaca-Mandic

Norton

Dowd

. Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Serv Res. 2012;47:255–274.

33.

Maarten

Buis

. Stata tip 87: Interpretation of interactions in nonlinear models. Stata J. 2012;10:305–308.

34.

Buchmueller

Grumbach

Kronick

Kahn

. The effect of health insurance on medical care utilization and implications for insurance expansion: A review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2005;62:3–30.

35.

Deschamps

Hilman

. The effects of copayments on the use of medical services and prescription drugs in Utah's Medicaid program. Available at: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1398. Accessed

36.

Wright

Carlson

Edlund

. The impact of increased cost sharing on Medicaid enrollees. Health Affairs. 2005;24:1106–1116.

37.

Adams

Florence

Thorpe

Becker

Joski

. Preventive care, female cancer screening, 1996–2000. Am J Prev Med. 2005;25:301–307.

38.

Busch

Duchovny

. Family coverage expansions: Impact on insurance coverage and health care utilization of parents. J Health Econ. 2005;24:876–890.

39.

Guy

. The effects of cost sharing on access to care among childless adults. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:1720–1739.

40.

Edwards

Bronstein

Adams

. Evaluation of family planning demonstrations. Final report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Studies (CMS), contract no. 752-2-415921. Alexandria, Va: CNA Corporation; 2003.

41.

Ibis Reproductive Health. Contraception: Low-income women's access to contraception after Massachusetts health care reform. Available at: http://www.ibisreproductivehealth.org/work/contraception/Reform.cfm. Accessed May 22, 2012.