Smoke-Free Workplace Ballot Campaigns: Case Studies from Missouri and Lessons for Policy and Media Advocacy

Abstract

Purpose.

To assess the key components of smoke-free campaigns that may have influenced voting outcomes in three communities.

Design.

Community case studies with content analysis of tobacco-related newspaper articles.

Setting.

Three semiurban Missouri communities.

Subjects.

One hundred eighty-one articles referencing tobacco published during the campaigns and five key informant interviews.

Measures.

Articles were coded for type, community referenced, tobacco control position, source of quotations, use of evidence, and frame. Semistructured interviews with key informants collected additional information.

Analysis.

Descriptive statistics were utilized to examine media coverage in each community. Key themes and events for each campaign were identified from qualitative interviews.

Results.

The only community that failed to pass its initiative had the highest proportion of letters to the editor (81.1%), anti–tobacco control articles (34.2%), use of a rights frame (28.8%), no evidence used (36.9%), no neighboring communities with policies, strong Tea Party presence, and no support from the chamber of commerce. Across all communities, more articles incorporating health frames were pro–tobacco control (70.7%) and more articles with a rights frame were anti–tobacco control (62.0%), compared to other positions.

Conclusion.

Several factors can influence the policy process. Tobacco control policy advocates facing strong opposition should consider the many factors (demographics, proximity to other adopting localities, politics) driving the debate and use media as an avenue to influence the discussion, connect with the public and policymakers, and mobilize proponents.

Keywords

Tobacco Control Media Advocacy Prevention Research Qualitative Analysis Manuscript format: research Research purpose: descriptive Study design: content analysis Outcome measure: behavioral Setting: local community Health focus: smoking control Strategy: policy Target population age: adults Target population circumstances: education/income level,geographic location,race/ethnicity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brennan

Buffler

Reynolds

. Secondhand smoke exposure in adulthood and risk of lung cancer among never smokers: A pooled analysis of two large studies. Int J Cancer. 2004;109:125–131.

Vupputuri

Allen

. Passive smoking and the risk of coronary heart disease—a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:920–926.

Otsuka

Watanabe

Hirata

. Acute effects of passive smoking on the coronary circulation in healthy young adults. JAMA. 2001;286:436–441.

Pitsavos

Panagiotakos

Chrysohoou

. Association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the development of acute coronary syndromes: The CARDIO2000 case–control study. Tob Control. 2002;11:220–225.

Sturm

Yeatts

Loomis

. Effects of tobacco smoke exposure on asthma prevalence and medical care use in North Carolina middle school children. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:308–313.

US Dept of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.

Öberg

Jaakkola

Woodward

. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: A retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet. 2011;377:139–146.

Pickett

Schober

Brody

. Smoke-free laws and secondhand smoke exposure in US non-smoking adults, 1999–2002. Tob Control. 2006;15:302–307.

Wisotzky

Albuquerque

Pechacek

Park

. The National Tobacco Control Program: Focusing on policy to broaden impact. Public Health Rep. 2004;119:303–310.

10.

Giovino

Biener

Hartman

. Monitoring the tobacco use epidemic I. Overview: Optimizing measurement to facilitate change. Prev Med. 2009;48(1 suppl):S4–S10.

11.

Brownson

Haire-Joshu

Luke

. Shaping the context of health: A review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:341–370.

12.

Ong

Glantz

. Cardiovascular health and economic effects of smoke-free workplaces. Am J Med. 2004;117:32–38.

13.

Barnoya

Arvizu

Jones

. Secondhand smoke exposure in bars and restaurants in Guatemala City: Before and after smoking ban evaluation. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22:151–156.

14.

Barnoya

Glantz

. Cardiovascular effects of secondhand smoke: Nearly as large as smoking. Circulation. 2005;111:2684–2698.

15.

Barnoya

Glantz

. Association of the California tobacco control program with declines in lung cancer incidence. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:689–695.

16.

Farrelly

Nonnemaker

Chou

. Changes in hospitality workers' exposure to secondhand smoke following the implementation of New York's smoke-free law. Tob Control. 2005;14:236–241.

17.

Pell

Haw

Cobbe

. Smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:482–491.

18.

Jemal

Cokkinides

Shafey

Thun

. Lung cancer trends in young adults: An early indicator of progress in tobacco control (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:579–585.

19.

Institute of Medicine. Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Cardiovascular Effects: Making Sense of the Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010.

20.

Hahn

Rayens

York

. Effects of a smoke-free law on hair nicotine and respiratory symptoms of restaurant and bar workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:906–913.

21.

Menzies

Nair

Williamson

. Respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and markers of inflammation among bar workers before and after a legislative ban on smoking in public places. JAMA. 2006;296:1742–1748.

22.

Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights. Overview list—how many smokefree laws? January 2012. Available at: http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/mediaordlist.pdf. Accessed March 5, 2012.

23.

Hyland

Higbee

Borland

. Attitudes and beliefs about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11:642–649.

24.

Skeer

George

Hamilton

. Town-level characteristics and smoking policy adoption in Massachusetts: Are local restaurant smoking regulations fostering disparities in health protection? Am J Public Health. 2004;94:286–292.

25.

Ahrens

Uebelher

Remington

. Evaluation of community and organizational characteristics of smoke-free ordinance campaigns in 15 Wisconsin cities. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2:A08.

26.

Osypuk

Acevedo-Garcia

. Support for smoke-free policies: A nationwide analysis of immigrants, US-born, and other demographic groups, 1995–2002. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:171–181.

27.

Smith

Clegg K

Wakefield

Edsall

. The good news about smoking: How do US newspapers cover tobacco issues? J Public Health Pol. 2006;27:166–181.

28.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs—2007. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2007.

29.

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Big Tobacco's Latest Dirty Trick: Deceiving Oregon Voters. Washington, DC: Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids; 2007.

30.

Report summary: Missourians against tax abuse. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Ethics Commission; 2006.

31.

Tobacco Tax: Money Watch. Sacramento, Calif: California HealthCare Foundation; 2007.

32.

Willon

Supporters admit defeat on Prop. 29 tobacco tax. Los Angeles Times. 2012. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/23/local/la-me-prop-29-20120623. Accessed September 22, 2012.

33.

Farrelly

Nonnemaker

Davis

Hussin

. The influence of the National Truth Campaign on smoking initiation. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:379–384.

34.

Niederdeppe

Farrelly

Haviland

. Confirming “truth”: More evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:255–257.

35.

Niederdeppe

Farrelly

Wenter

. Media advocacy, tobacco control policy change and teen smoking in Florida. Tob Control. 2007;16:47–52.

36.

Zaza

Briss

Harris

, Task Force on Community Preventive Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Dept of Health and Human Services , eds. The Guide to Community Preventive Services. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005.

37.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/statesystem. Accessed March 5, 2012.

38.

Harris

Geremakis

Moreland-Russell

. Demographic and geographic differences in exposure to secondhand smoke in Missouri workplaces, 2007–2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8:A135.

39.

Missouri Dept of Health and Senior Services. 2007 county-level study—secondhand smoke. Available at: http://health.mo.gov/data/CommunityDataProfiles/. Accessed March 5, 2012.

40.

Missouri Dept of Health and Senior Services. 2007 county-level study—tobacco use. Available at: http://health.mo.gov/data/CommunityDataProfiles/. Accessed March 5, 2012.

41.

Menashe

Siegel

. The power of a frame: An analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues—United States, 1985–1996. J Health Commun. 1998;3:307–325.

42.

Smith

Clegg K

Terry-McElrath

Wakefield

Durrant

. Media advocacy and newspaper coverage of tobacco issues: A comparative analysis of 1 year's print news in the United States and Australia. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7:289–299.

43.

Helme

Borland

Young

. The development and validation of a coding protocol to measure change in tobacco-control newspaper coverage. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7:103–109.

44.

Moreland-Russell

Harris

Israel

. “Anti-smoking data are exaggerated” versus “the data are clear and indisputable”: Examining letters to the editor about tobacco. J Health Commun. 2012:1–17.

45.

No to smoking ban [Speak Out]. Cape Girardeau Southeast Missourian. January 16, 2011. http://www.semissourian.com/story/1695357.html.

46.

Prakop W. Protecting your health. Mid Rivers Newsmagazine. January 26, 2011:4.

47.

Harris

Shelton

Moreland-Russell

Luke

. Tobacco coverage in print media: The use of timing and themes by tobacco control supporters and opposition before a failed tobacco tax initiative. Tob Control. 2010;19:37–43.

48.

Smoking sickness [Speak Out]. Cape Girardeau Southeast Missourian. January 25, 2011. http://www.semissourian.com/story/1697532.html.

49.

Brennan

. Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educ Psychol Meas. 1981;41:687–699.

50.

Warrens

. Inequalities between multi-rater kappas. Adv Data Anal Classif. 2010;4:271–286.

51.

Gwet

. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008;61(pt 1):29–48.

52.

Cape Girardeau County. Summary for jurisdiction wide, all counters, all races 4/5/2011—unofficial results. 2011. Available at: http://www.capecounty.us/files/Election/results.htm. Accessed March 7, 2012.

53.

St. Charles County. April 5, 2011 general municipal election results. 2011. Available at: http://election.sccmo.org/election/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=227. Accessed March 6, 2012.

54.

Greene County County Clerk. April 5, 2011 municipal election results. 2011. Available at: http://www.greenecountymo.org/election/elections_result.php. Accessed March 7, 2012.

55.

Smith

Clegg K

Siebel

Pham

. News on tobacco and public attitudes toward smokefree air policies in the United States. Health Policy. 2008;86:42–52.

56.

Katz

. Individual rights advocacy in tobacco control policies: An assessment and recommendation. Tob Control. 2005;14(suppl 2):ii31–ii37.