In this paper, we model the impact on the entry into poverty of a range of
demographic and labour market events. Our analyses are based on longitudinal
panel data from two countries belonging to a different regime type – Belgium and
Britain. The results show that while in Belgium the impact of most life events
is relatively small, in Britain most demographic and labour market events
significantly raise the chances of becoming poor. We link the observed poverty
entry patterns to the ways in which economic welfare in Belgium and Britain is
distributed between the three main systems of resources distribution: the
welfare state, the labour market and the family. We furthermore find that the
combined influence of the interrelated parts of the welfare regime on the role
of women in the household economy is a potentially important explanatory
factor.
AllisonP. D.
(1999) Logistic Regression Using The SAS® System:
Theory and Application.Cary, NC: Sas Institute
Inc.
2.
AndreottiA.,
GARCIAS. M.,
GOMEZA.,
HESPANHAP.,
KAZEPOVY.,
and MINGIONEE.
(2001). ‘Does a Southern European Model
Exist?’, Journal of European Area Studies,
Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.
43–62.
3.
AndreH.-J.
(1998) ‘Empirical Poverty Research in a
Comparative Perspective: Basic Orientations and Outline of the
Book’, in
AndreH.-J.
(editor) Empirical Poverty Research in a Comparative
Perspective.Aldershot:
Ashgate.
4.
AshworthK.,
HILLM. S.,
and WALKERR.
(2000) ‘A New Approach to Poverty
Dynamics’, in
RoseD.
(editor) Researching Social and Economic Change. The Uses of Household
Panel Studies.London:
Routledge.
5.
AtkinsonT.,
CANTILLONB.,
MARLIERE.,
and NOLANB.
(2002) Social Indicators. The EU and Social
Inclusion.Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
6.
BaneM. J.,
and ELLWOODD. T.
(1986). ‘Slipping into and out of Poverty: The
Dynamics of Spells’, The Journal of Human
Resources, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.
1–23.
7.
BardasiE.,
JENKINSS. P.,
and RIGGJ. A.
(2001) Documentation for Derived Current and Annual Net
Household Income Variables, BHPS waves 1-9,
Colchester: Institute for
Social and Economic Research.
8.
BonoliG.
(1997). ‘Classifying Welfare States: A
Two-Dimension Approach’, Journal of Social
Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.
351–72.
9.
BreenR., and
MOISIOP.
(2003) Poverty Dynamics Corrected for Measurement
Error, Working Paper 17. Colchester:
Institute for Social and Economic
Research.
10.
CantillonB.
(1999) ‘Samenvatting en beleidsconclusies: naar
een herstel van het evenwicht tussen arbeid, gezin en
verzorgingsstaat’, in
CantillonB.
(editor) De welvaartsstaat in de kering.Kapellen:
Pelckmans.
11.
CastlesF. G.
(1994) ‘On Religion and Public Policy: Does
Catholicism make a Difference?’European Journal of Political Research, Vol.
25, No. 1, pp.
19–40.
12.
CastlesF.
G., and
FLOODM.
(1993) ‘Why Divorce Rates Differ: Law, Religious
Belief and Modernity’, in
CastlesF. G.
(editor) Families of Nations. Patterns of Public Policy in Western
Democracies.Aldershot:
Darthmouth.
13.
CastlesF.
G., and
MITCHELLD.
(1993) ‘Worlds of Welfare and Families of
Nations’, in CastlesF.
G. (editor) Families of Nations. Patterns
of Public Policy in Western Democracies.Aldershot:
Darthmouth.
14.
CookJ.,
ROCHEM.,
WILLAMSC. C.,
and WINDEBANKJ.
(2001). ‘The Evolution of Active Welfare
Policies as a Solution to Social Exclusion in Britain’,
Journal of European Area Studies, Vol. 9,
No. 1, pp. 13–26.
15.
De
GraafP. M., and
ULTEEW. C.
(2000) ‘United in Employment, United in
Unemployment? Employment and Unemployment of Couples in the European Union
in 1994’, In
GallieD., and
PaugamS.
(editors), Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in
Europe.Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
16.
De
LathouwerL.
(1996) Twintig jaar beleidsontwikkelingen in de
Belgische werkloosheidsverzekering, CSB-Berichten.
Antwerpen: Centrum voor Sociaal
Beleid.
17.
De
LathouwerL.,
BOGAERTSK.,
and VAN DEN BOSCHK.
(2003) Schorsing artikel 80 gewikt en gewogen. Een
evaluatie vanuit herintrede, behoefte en verzek eringsperspectief,
CSB-Berichten. Antwerpen:
Centrum voor Sociaal
Beleid.
18.
De
LathouwerL.,
CANTILLONB.,
ANDRIESM.,
and MARXI.
(1999) ‘De Belgische route in perspectief:
markt, gezin en sociale zekerheid in de
OESO-welvaartsstaten’, in
CantillonB.
(editor) De welvaartsstaat in de kering.Kapellen:
Pelckmans.
19.
De
LathouwerL., and
MARXI.
(2002). ‘Werkgelegenheid en armoede. De
prestaties van België en Nederland in vergelijkend
perspectief’, Tijdschrift voor
Arbeidsvraagstukken, Vol. 18, No.
4, pp. 335–50.
20.
DelsenL.
(1997). ‘Flexibilisering van de arbeid in
Europa’, Tijdschrift voor
Arbeidsvraagstukken, Vol. 13, No.
1, pp. 23–36.
21.
DennisI.,
and GUIOA.-C.
(2003). ‘Poverty and Social Exclusion in the EU
after Laeken - Part 1’, Statistics in
Focus, Theme 3-8/2003.
22.
DewildeC.
(2003). ‘A Life-Course Perspective on Social
Exclusion and Poverty’, The British Journal of
Sociology, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp.
109–28.
23.
DewildeC.
(2004). Vormen en trajecten van armoede in het
Belgische en Britse welvaartsregime. Multidimensionele armoededynamiek en
bestudeerd vanuit de sociologie van de levensloop, Proefschrift
voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Politieke en Sociale
Wetenschappen aan de Universiteit Antwerpen.
DitchJ.,
BARNESH.,
BRADSHAWJ.,
and KILKEYM.
(1998) A Synthesis of National Family Policies
1996.York: European Observatory on
National Family Policies (European
Commission).
26.
DuncanG. J.
(editor) (1984) Years of Poverty, Years of Plenty: The
Changing Economic Fortunes of American Workers and Families.Michigan: Institute for Social
Research.
27.
EngbersenG.
(1998) ‘De taal van de armoede’,
In EngbersenG.,
VroomanJ. C.,
and SnelE. (editors),
Arm Nederland. Effecten van armoede en sociale uitsluiting. Derde
jaarrapport armoede en sociale uitsluiting.Amsterdam: Amsterdam University
Press.
28.
Esping-AndersenG.
(1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Cambridge: Polity
Press.
29.
Esping-AndersenG.
(1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial
Economies.Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
30.
ESRC RESEARCH CENTRE ON MICRO-SOCIAL
CHANGE (2002) British Household Panel Survey.
Data Files and Associated Documentation.Colchester: The Data
Archive.
31.
FerreraM.
(1996). ‘The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in
Social Europe’, Journal of European Social
Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.
17–37.
32.
FouargeD.
(2002). Minimal Protection and Poverty in Europe. An
Economic Analysis of the Subsidiarity Principle within EU Social
Policy, Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad
van doctor aan de Katholieke Universiteit
Brabant.
33.
GallieD.,
and PAUGAMS.
(2000) ‘The Experience of Unemployment in
Europe: The Debate’, In
GallieD., and
PaugamS.
(editors), Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in
Europe.Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
34.
GoodinR. E.,
HEADEYB.,
MUFFELSR.,
and DIRVENH.-J.
(2000) The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
35.
GornickJ.
C., MEYERSM.
K., and
ROSSK. E.
(1997). ‘Supporting the Employment of Mothers:
Policy Variation Across Fourteen Welfare States’,
Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 7,
No. 1, pp. 45–70.
36.
IacovouM.
(1998) Young People in Europe: Two Models of Household
Formation, Working Paper 6.
Colchester: European Panel
Analysis Group.
37.
JarvisS.,
and JENKINSS. P.
(1995) Do the Poor Stay Poor? New Evidence about Income
Dynamics from the British Household Panel Survey, Occasional Paper
95-2. Colchester: ESRC Research
Centre on Micro-Social Change.
38.
JarvisS.,
and JENKINSS. P.
(1999). ‘Marital Splits and Income Changes:
Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey’,
Population Studies, Vol. 53, pp.
237–54.
39.
JenkinsS. P.
(2000). ‘Modeling Household Income
Dynamics’, Journal of Population Economics,
Vol. 13, No. 4, pp.
529–67.
40.
JoshiH., and
DAVIESH.
(2002) ‘Women's Incomes over A Synthetic
Lifetime’, In
RuspiniE.,
and DaleA. (editors),
The Gender Dimension of Social Change. The Contribution of Dynamic
Research to the Study of Women's Life Courses.Bristol: The Policy
Press.
41.
KangasO.,
and RITAKALLIOV.-M.
(1998) ‘Different Methods - Different Results?
Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty’, in
AndreH.-J.
(editor) Empirical Poverty Research in a Comparative
Perspective.Aldershot:
Ashgate.
42.
KorpiW., and
PALMEJ.
(2003). ‘New Politics and Class Politics in the
Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18
countries, 1975-95’, American Political Science
Review, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp.
1–22.
43.
LayteR., and
WHELANC. T.
(2002) Moving in and out of Poverty: The Impact of
Welfare Regimes on Poverty Dynamics in the EU, Working Paper 30.
Colchester: European Panel
Analysis Group.
MillsM., and
BLOSSFELDH.-P.
(2004) ‘Globalization, Uncertainty and the Early
Life Course: A Theoretical Framework’, In
BlossfeldH.-P.,
KlijzingE.,
KurzK., and
MillsM.
(editors), Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society.London:
Routledge.
46.
MuffelsR.,
and FOUARGED.
(2004). ‘The Role of European Welfare States in
Explaining Resources Deprivation’, Social Indicators
Research, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp.
299–330.
47.
O'CONNORJ.
S. (1996). ‘From Women in
the Welfare State to Gendering Welfare State Regimes’,
Current Sociology, Vol. 44, No.
2, pp. 1–130.
48.
OrloffA. S.
(1996). ‘Gender in the Welfare
State’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.
22, pp.
51–78.
49.
PampelF. C.
(2000) Logistic Regression. A Primer.Thousand Oaks:
Sage.
50.
RingenS.
(1988). ‘Direct and Indirect Measures of
Poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, Vol.
17, No. 3, pp.
351–65.
51.
RoseD.
(editor) (2000) Researching Social and Economic Change. The
Uses of Household Panel Studies.London:
Routledge.
52.
RuspiniE.
(2002) Introduction to Longitudinal Research.London:
Routledge.
SandefurG.
D., and TUMAN.
B. (1987). ‘How Data
Type Affects Conclusions about Individual Mobility’,
Social Science Research, Vol. 16, pp.
301–28.
55.
TaylorM. F.,
BRICEJ.,
BUCKN., and
PRENTICE-LANEE.
(2001) British Household Panel Survey User Manual
Volume A: Introduction, Technical Reports and Appendices,
Colchester: University of
Essex.
56.
TownsendP.
(1979) Poverty in the United Kingdom. A Survey of
Household Resources and Standards of Living.Harmondsworth: Penguin
Books.
57.
WalkerR.
(1998) ‘Rethinking Poverty in a Dynamic
Perspective’, in
AndreH.-J.
(editor) Empirical Poverty Research in a Comparative
Perspective.Aldershot:
Ashgate.
58.
WhelanC. T.,
LAYTER., and
MAÎTREB.
(2002). ‘Multiple Deprivation and Persistent
Poverty in the European Union’, Journal of European
Social Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.
91–105.
