Choosing Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Atlas/ti and Nudist Compared

Abstract

Choosing between Nudist and Atlas/ti, the main qualitative data analysis software packages can be difficult. To assist researchers in making this choice, I have conceptualised their differences along two dimensions, related to the qualities of the software and of the research project. The software dimension is structural design, and the project dimension is complexity. Software structure is dichotomised between structured, sequential, verbal versus visual, spatial, interconnected modes of operation. Projects are dichotomised between homogeneous sample, short timeframe, single data-type, single data analyst; versus multiple samples, longitudinal data, multiple data types and team data analysis. First I review the CAQDAS literature. Then I outline the different personalities and strengths of Atlas/ti and Nudist, and show how they match these dimensions. I offer suggestions as to how to choose, and whether to use in tandem with complementary conceptual network software.

Keywords

CAQDAS Chaos Theory Computer Software Conceptual Network Software Hypertext Qualitative Research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BARRY

C.A.

(1994) ‘A Q-Sort Study of Men and Women's Definitions of Morality’. Unpublished psychology undergraduate dissertation.

BARRY

C.A.

(1995) ‘Critical Issues in Evaluating the Impact of IT on Information Activity in Academic Research: Developing a Qualitative Research Solution’, Library and Information Science Research, no. 17, pp. 107–134.

BARRY

C.A.

(1997) ‘Information Skills for an Electronic World: Training Doctoral Research Students’, Journal of Information Science, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 225–238.

BARRY

C.A.

, and SQUIRES

(1995) ‘Why the Move from Traditional Information-Seeking to the Electronic Library is not Straightforward for Academic Users: Some Surprising Findings’, in Raitt

D.I.

, and Jeapes

(editors) Online Information ‘95: 19th International Online Information Meeting Proceedings (pp. 177–188). Oxford: Learned Information

BUSTON

(1997) ‘NUD*IST in Action: Its Use and its Usefulness in a Study of Chronic Illness in Young People’ Sociological Research Online, vol. 2, no. 3, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/3/6.html>.

COFFEY

, HOLBROOK

, and ATKINSON

(1996) ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: Technologies and Representations’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 1, no. 1, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/4.html>.

GREEN

JUDITH

(1998) ‘Commentary: Grounded Theory and the Constant Comparative Method’, British Medical Journal, vol. 316, pp. 1064–65.

HONEY

, and MUMFORD

(1992) Manual of Learning Styles, 3rd edition. Maidenhead: P.Honey.

ISAAC

A.R.

, and MARKS

D.F.

(1994) Individual Differences in Mental Imagery Experience Developmental Changes and Specialization’, British Journal of Psychology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 479–500.

10.

KELLE

(1997) ‘Theory Building in Qualitative Research and Computer Programs for the Management of Textual Data’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 2, no. 2, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/1.html>.

11.

KLEINMAN

, and COPP

M.A.

(1993) Emotions and Fieldwork. (Qualitative Research Methods Series, volume 28). Newbury Park: Sage.

12.

LANDOW

G.P.

(1992) Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. London: John Hopkins University Press.

13.

LEE

R.M.

, and FIELDING

(1991) ‘Computing for Qualitative Research: Options, Problems and Potential’, in Fielding

, and Lee

R.M.

(editors) Using Computers in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

14.

LEE

R.M.

, and FIELDING

(1996) ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: Representations of a Technology: A comment on Coffey, Holbrook and Atkinson’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 1, no. 4, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/4/lf.html>.

15.

LOYE

(1995) ‘How Predictable is the Future? The Conflict between Traditional Chaos Theory and the Psychology of Prediction, and the Challenge for Chaos Psychology’, in Robertson

, and Combs

(Editors) Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbau.

16.

MARSHALL

, and BARRY

C.A.

(1997) ‘Analysing Qualitative Data using Computer Software Programmes’ (Workshop). Association of University Departments of General Practice Annual Scientific Meeting, Dublin, July.

17.

MASON

(1996) Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.

18.

MILES

M.B.

, and HUBERMAN

A.M.

(1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

19.

POINCARE

(1908) La Science et l'Hypothese [Science and Hypothesis]. Paris: E. Flammarion.

20.

SEIDEL

(1991) ‘Method and Madness in the Application of Computer Technology to Qualitative Data Analysis’, in Fielding

, and Lee

R.M.

(editors) Using Computers in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

21.

SQUIRES

, BARRY

C.A.

, and FUNSTON

H.T.

(1995) The Use of IT-Assisted Information Systems in Academic Research. (British Library R&D report No. 6215). London: British Library.

22.

TESCH

(1990) Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. London: Falmer Press.

23.

TORRE

C.A.

(1995) ‘Chaos, Creativity and Innovation: Toward a Dynamical Model of Problem Solving’, in Robertson

, and Combs

(Editors) Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbau.

24.

WEAVER

, and ATKINSON

(1994) Microcomputing and Qualitative Data Analysis. Avebury: Aldershot.

25.

WEITZMAN

, and MILES

(1995) Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

26.

WINOGRAD

(1996) Bringing Design to Software. Stanford, CA: Stanford University and Interval Research Corporatio.