Solo-living is analytically separate from ‘being single’ and merits separate study. In most Western countries more men are solo-living than women at ages conventionally associated with co-resident partners and children. Discussions of ‘demographic transition’ and change in personal life however typically place women in the vanguard, to the relative neglect of men. We draw on European Social Survey data and relevant qualitative research from Europe and North America demonstrating the need for further research.
AdkinsL. (2005). ‘Reflexivity: Freedom or habit of gender?’ in AdkinsL, and SkeggsB.Feminism After BourdieuBlackwell, Oxford.
2.
BaumanZ. (2005). Liquid Life.Cambridge: Polity.
3.
BaumanZ. (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds.Cambridge: Polity.
4.
BaumanZ. (2001). The Individualized SocietyCambridge: Polity.
5.
BeckU. (1992) Risk Society: Towards A New Modernity, London: Sage.
6.
BeckU., & BECK-GERNSHEIME. (1995). The Normal Chaos Of Love.Oxford: Polity Press.
7.
BellahR.N., MADSENR., SULLIVANW.M., SWIDLERA., TIPTONS.M., (1985) Habits of the Heart: Individualism and commitment in American life.Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
BergerP., and KELLNERH. (1964). ‘Marriage and the construction of reality: an exercise in the microsociology of knowledge’.Diogenes12: 1–24. [doi: 10.1177/039219216401204601]
9.
BienW., MARBACHJ., & TEMPLETONR. (1992). ‘Social Networks of Single-Person Households’, in MarshC., and ArberS. (eds.) Families and Households: divisions and change.London: Macmillan.
10.
BenditR.; GAISERW., & MARBACHJ. (1999). Youth and Housing in Germany and the European Union.Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
11.
BudgeonS. (2006). Friendship and Formations of Sociality in Late Modernity: the Challenge of ‘Post Traditional Intimacy’.Sociological Research Online, 11/3. [doi: 10.5153/sro.1248]
12.
BrannenJ., and NILSENA. (2005) ‘Individualisation, choice and structure: A discussion of current trends in sociological analysis’.Sociological Review53: 412–428. [doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00559.x]
CaldwellJ., & SHINDLMAYRT. (2003). Explanations of fertility crisis in modern societies: A search for commonalitiesPopulation Studies57, pp. 241–263. [doi: 10.1080/0032472032000137790]
15.
ChandlerJ., WILLIAMSM., MACONACHIEM., COLLETTT., & DODGEONB. (2004). Living alone: its place in household formation and change.Sociological Research Online, 9: 3. [doi: 10.5153/sro.971]
16.
ChandlerJ. (1991). Women Without Husbands: An Exploration Of The Margins Of Marriage.London: Macmillan.
17.
CharlesN., DAVIESC.A., and HARRISC.2008. Families in Transition: Social Change, Family Formation and Kin Relationships.Bristol: Policy Press.
18.
CherlinA. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage.Journal of Marriage and the Family66, pp. 848–861. [doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x]
19.
ClarkeL., and O'BRIENM. (2002). ‘Father involvement in Britain: the research and policy evidence’ in DayR.D., and LambM. (eds.) Reconceptualising and Measuring FatherhoodNew York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
ConnellR.W., and MESSERCHMIDTJ.W. (2005) ‘Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept’.Gender and Society19: 829–859. [doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639]
22.
CrowG. (2002). ‘Families, moralities, rationalities and social change’ in CarlingA., DuncanS., and EdwardsR. (eds.) Analysing Families.London: Routledge.
23.
DermottE. (2008) Intimate Fatherhood: A sociological analysis.Abingdon: Routledge.
DuncanS., and SMITHD. (2006) ‘Individualisation versus the geography of ‘new’ families’.Twenty-First Century Society1: 167–189. [doi: 10.1080/17450140600906955]
26.
EhrenreichB (1983). The Hearts of Men: American dreams and the flight from commitment.NY Anchor Press/Doubleday.
27.
FrejkaT. (2004) ‘The “curiously high” fertility of the USA’Population Studies59, pp. 89–92.
28.
GersonK. (1993). No Man's Land: Men's Changing Commitments to Family and Work.New York: Basic Books.
29.
GiddensA. (1992). The Transformation of IntimacyCambridge: Polity Press.
30.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age.Cambridge: Polity Press.
31.
GiddensA. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity.Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
GierveldJ. (2004). Remarriage, Unmarried Cohabitation, Living Apart Together: Partner Relationships Following Bereavement or Divorce.Journal of Marriage and the Family66, pp. 236–243.
33.
GlanvilleK., MACONACHIEM., SUTTONC., and CHANDLERJ. (2005) Solo Living in Devon: Project Report.Plymouth: School of Sociology, Politics and Law, University of Plymouth.
34.
GordonT. (1994). Single Women: On The Margins?Basingstoke: Macmillan.
35.
GoldscheiderF., & GOLDSCHEIDERC. (1999). The Changing Transition to Adulthood: Leaving and Returning Home.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
HallR, OGDENP E., HILLC. (1999). Living alone: evidence from England and Wales and France for the last two decades. In McRaS (Ed.) Changing Britain. Families and Households in the 1990s. pp. 265–296Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
HallR, OGDENP E (2003). The rise of living alone in Inner London: trends among the population of working age.Environment and Planning A35, pp. 871–888. [doi: 10.1068/a3549]
39.
HaskeyJ (2005). Living arrangements in contemporary Britain: having a partner who usually lives elsewhere; Living-apart-together, LAT.Population Trends122, pp. 35–46.
40.
HaywoodC., MAC AN GHAILLM. (2003). Men and Masculinities.Buckingham: Open University Press.
41.
HeathS., & CLEAVERE. (2003). Young, Free and Single: Twenty-somethings and Household Change.London: Macmillan.
42.
HeathS., & MIRETP. (1996). Living in and out of the parental home in Spain and Great Britain: a comparative approach.Cambridge Group for the History of Population and Social Structure Working Paper Series, 2.
43.
HeathS (2004). Shared households, quasi-communes and neo-tribes.Current Sociology, 52, 2, pp. 161–179. [doi: 10.1177/0011392104041799]
44.
HobcraftJ. (2004) ‘Method, theory and substance in understanding choices about becoming a parent: Progress or regress?’Population Studies58, pp. 81–84.
45.
HochschildA. (2003). The Commercialization of Intimate LifeBerkeley: University of California Press.
46.
HochschildA. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home.New York: Viking Adult.
47.
HollandJ., RAMAZANOGLUC., SHARPES., and THOMSONR.1998. The Male in the Head: Young people, heterosexuality and powerLondon: The Tufnell Press.
48.
HolmesM. (2006). ‘Love Lives at a Distance: Distance Relationships over the Lifecourse’, Sociological Research Online11
49.
IacovouM., and BERTHOUDR. (2001). Young people's lives: A Map of Europe.Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research.
50.
IrwinS. (2005). Reshaping Social LifeLondon: Routledge.
51.
JamiesonL. (1999) ‘Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look At The ‘Pure Relationship’, Sociology33: 477–494.
52.
JamiesonL. (1998). Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societiesPolity Press, Cambridge.
53.
JamiesonL. (1987). ‘Theories of family development and the experience of being brought up’Sociology21: 591–607. [doi: 10.1177/0038038587021004007]
54.
JamiesonL, STEWARTR., LIY., ANDERSONM., BECHHOFERF., and MCCRONED. (2002). Single, 20 something and seeking? in AllanG, & JonesG. (eds.) Social Relations and the Life CoursePalgrave, London pp. 135–154.
55.
JonesG. (1991). Fitting Homes? Young People's Housing and Housing Strategies in Rural Scotland, Journal of Youth Studies, 4, pp. 41–62 [doi: 10.1080/13676260120028547]
56.
JowellR, AND THE CENTRAL CO-ORDINATING TEAM (2003). European Social Survey 2002/2003: Technical Report (ESS Round 1).London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys.
57.
JowellR., AND THE CENTRAL CO-ORDINATING TEAM (2005). European Social Survey 2004/2005: Technical Report (ESS round 2).London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys.
58.
KaufmannJ. (1994). One person households in Europe.Population49, 4-5, pp. 935–958
59.
KaufmanG., and GOLDSCHEIDERF. (2007) ‘Do men “need” a spouse more than women? Perceptions of the importance of marriage for men and women’.Sociological Quarterly48: 29–46. [doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00069.x]
60.
KohlerH., BILLARIF., ORTEGAJ. (2002). The Emergence of Lowest-Low Fertility in Europe During the 1990s.Population and Development Review28, pp. 641–680. [doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00641.x]
61.
LevinI. (2004). Living apart together: A new family form.Current Sociology52, pp. 223–240. [doi: 10.1177/0011392104041809]
62.
LewisJ (2001). The End of Marriage, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
63.
MacfarlaneA. (1978). The Origins of English Individualism: the Family, Property and Social TransitionOxford: Basil Blackwell.
64.
McnayL. (2000). Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social TheoryCambridge: Polity.
65.
MacphersonC.B. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to LockeOxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
MacvarishJ. (2006). What is ‘the Problem’ of Singleness?’, Sociological Research Online, 11(3). [doi: 10.5153/sro.1418]
67.
MarksN. D. (1996). Flying solo at midlife: Gender, marital status, and psychological well-being.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, pp. 917–932. [doi: 10.2307/353980]
68.
MarsiglioW., HUTCHINSONS., and COHANM. (2001) ‘Young Men's Procreative Identity: Becoming Aware, Being Aware, and Being Responsible’.Journal of Marriage and the Family63: 123–135. [doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00123.x]
69.
O'BrienM., and SHEMILTI. (2003) Working fathers: earning and caring.Manchester: EOC.
70.
O'BrienM., and JONESD. (1995). ‘Young people's attitudes to fatherhood’ in MossP. (ed.) Father Figures: Fathers in the families of the 1990sEdinburgh: HMSO.
71.
PahlR. E., and SPENCERL. (2004). Personal Communities: not simply families of ‘fate’ or ‘choice’.Current Sociology, 52, pp. 199–221. [doi: 10.1177/0011392104041808]
72.
ReynoldsJ., WETHERELLM, and TAYLORS. (2007) Choice and Chance: negotiating agency in the narrative of singleness.The Sociological Review, 55, pp. 331–251. [doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00708.x]
73.
ReynoldsJ., and WETHERELLM. (2003). The Discursive Climate of Singleness: The Consequences for Women's Negotiation of a Single Identity.Feminism and Psychology, 13, pp. 489–510. [doi: 10.1177/09593535030134014]
74.
RoseneilS., and BUDGEONS. (2004). Cultures of Intimacy and Care Beyond ‘the Family’: Personal Life and Social Change in the Early 21st Century’, Current Sociology, 52, pp. 135–159. [doi: 10.1177/0011392104041798]
75.
RoseneilS. (2006). ‘On Not Living with a Partner: Unpicking Coupledom and Cohabitation’, Sociological Research Online11.
76.
SantoreD. (2008) ‘Romantic Relationships, Individualism and the Possibility of Togetherness: Seeing Durkheim in Theories of Contemporary Intimacy’.Sociology42: 1200–1217. [doi: 10.1177/0038038508096941]
77.
SharpE., and GANONGL. (2007). ‘Living in the Gray: Women's Experiences of Missing the Marital Transition’Journal of Marriage and the Family69, pp. 831–844 [doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00408.x]
78.
SimpsonR. (2006). The Intimate Relationships of Contemporary Spinsters.Sociological Research Online11(3) [doi: 10.5153/sro.1422]
79.
SimpsonR. (2005). Contemporary Spinsterhood in Britain: Gender, Partnership Status and Social Change, PhD thesis, University of London.
80.
SkolnickA. (1991). Embattled Paradise: The American Family in an Age of Uncertainty.Basic Books, New York
81.
SmartC. (2007) Personal Life: New Directions In Sociological Thinking, Cambridge: Polity
82.
SpencerL., and PAHLR. (2006). Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today.Princeton University Press.
83.
StaceyJ. (1990). Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America.NY: Basic Books.
84.
StaceyJ. (1996). In the Name of the Family: Rethinking Family Values in the Postmodern Age.Boston: Beacon Press.
85.
TherbornG. (2004). Between Sex and Power: Family in the world 1900-2000.NY: Routledge.
86.
TrimbergerE. KAY (2005). The New Single Woman.Boston: Beacon Press.
87.
TrinderL., BECKM., and CONNOLYJ. (2002) Making contact: how parents and children negotiate and experience contact after divorceYork: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
88.
WarinJ., SOLOMONY., LEWISC., and LANGFORDW. (1999) Fathers, Work and Family Life.London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
89.
WasoffF., and JAMIESONL. (2005a). Solo-living Across the Adult Lifecourse: Full Research Report.ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-0531, Swindon: ESRC.
90.
WasoffF., JAMIESONL, and SMITHA. (2005b). Solo-living, Individual and Family Boundaries across the adult lifecourse inMcKieL, and Cunningham-BurleyS (eds) Families and Society: Boundaries and Relationships.Bristol: Policy Press
91.
WightD.1994. ‘Boys Thoughts and Talk about Sex in a Working-Class Locality of Glasgow’.Sociological Review42: 702–737.
92.
WightD.1996. ‘Beyond the predatory male’ in AdkinsL., and MerchantV. (eds.) Sexualizing the Social: Macmillan.
93.
WilliamsM. (2007). Solo-living and Life Course Changes 1991-2001: Full Research Report.ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-1413.Swindon: ESRC
94.
WilliamsM., MACONACHIEM., and CHANDLERJ. (2004). Baseline Study of Solo-Living and Longterm Illness: Full Research Report.ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-0081.Swindon: ESRC.
