This article examines the use of audio diaries as an innovative method for research with young people. As the second stage of a project about visually impaired (VI) young people's transitions to adulthood, young people recorded their experiences and reflections about growing up on microcassette recorders. As a follow-up to a narrative interview, audio diaries allowed the research to get closer to the lives of young people, as participants actively reinterpreted the research questions in the context of their own lives. This article focuses on the utility of audio diaries—detailing the research process and the accessibility of the method for VI young people. Then, using excerpts from a set of twenty-two audio diaries, this article examines how the audio diary technique designed for this project engages with three key issues: how audio diaries capture narrative in distinctive ways; how the method can be employed within a participatory framework; and how audio diaries raise complex issues about the nature of audience.
AlaszewskiA. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research, London, Sage.
2.
BallS. J., MAGUIREM., and MACRAES. (2000). Choice, Pathways and Transitions Post-16: New Youth, New Economies in the Global City, London, Routledge.
3.
BeckU. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London, Sage.
4.
BoormanG., CLARKEG., and NINDM. (2009). In their own words: the missing voices of girls with behavioural, social and emotional difficulties. Gender and Education Annual Conference.London Institute of Education.
5.
BrunerJ. (2001). Self-making and world-making. In BROCKMEIERJ., & CARBAUGHD. (eds.) Narrative and Identity: Studies in Autobiography, Self and Culture.Amsterdam, John Benjamins B. V., pp. 25–37.
6.
BuchwaldD., SCHANTZ-LAURSENB., and DELMARC. (2009). Video diary data collection in research with children: an alternative method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1).
7.
ButlerR. (1998). Rehabilitating the images of disabled youths. In SKELTONT., & VALENTINEG. (eds.) Cool Places: Geographies of Youth Cultures.London, Routledge, pp. 83–100.
8.
CÔTÉJ. E., and ALLAHARA. L. (2005). Critical Youth Studies: A Canadian Focus, Toronto, Pearson Prentice Hall.
9.
CoxonA. P. M. (1996). Between the Sheets: Sexual Diaries and Gay Men's Sex in the Era of Aids, London, Cassell.
10.
CraigL. (2006). Children and the revolution: a time-diary analysis of the impact of motherhood on daily workload. Journal of Sociology, 42(125–140). [doi: 10.1177/1440783306064942]
11.
Delph-JaniurekT. (2001). (Un)consensual conversations: betweenness, ‘material access’, laughter and reflexivity in research. Area, 33(4): 414–421. [doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00047]
12.
ElliotH. (1997). The use of diaries in sociological research on health experience. Sociological Research Online, 2(2): <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/7.html>. [doi: 10.5153/sro.38]
13.
FarrellT. J. (1978). Differentiating writing from talking. College Composition and Communication, 29(4): 346–350. [doi: 10.2307/357017]
14.
FlickU. (1997). The episodic interview: Small scale narratives as approach to relevant experiences. Discussion Papers in Qualitative Research.London, London School of Economics.
15.
FurlongA., and CARTMELF. (2007). Young People and Social Change: New Perspectives, Berkshire, Open University Press.
16.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge, Polity Press.
17.
GoodleyD., LAWTHOMR., CLOUGHP., and MOOREM. (eds.) (2004). Researching Life Stories: Method, Theory and Analyses in a Biographical Age, London, RoutledgeFalmer.
18.
GrewalI., JOYS., LEWISJ., SWALESK., and WOODFIELDK. (2002). ‘Disabled for life?’ attitudes towards, and experiences of, disability in Britain.Department for Work and Pensions, pp. 52–60.
19.
GrinyerA. (2004). The narrative correspondence method: What a follow-up study can tell us about the longer term effect of participants in emotionally demanding research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10): 1326–1341. [doi: 10.1177/1049732304269674]
20.
HendersonS., TAYLORR., and THOMSONR. (2002). In touch: young people, communication and technologies. Information, Communication and Society, 5(4): 494–512. [doi: 10.1080/13691180208538802]
21.
HermanD. (2004). Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative, Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press.
22.
HetheringtonK. (1998). Expressions of Identity: Space, Performance, Politics, London, Sage.
23.
HislopJ., ARBERS., MEADOWSR., and VENNS. (2005). Narratives of the night: The use of audio diaries in researching sleep. Sociological Research Online, 10(4): <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/4/hislop.html>. [doi: 10.5153/sro.1194]
24.
HoltL. (2004). Children with mind-body differences: performing disability in primary school classrooms. Children's Geographies, 2(2): 219–236. [doi: 10.1080/14733280410001720520]
25.
HookwayN. (2008). ‘Entering the blogosphere’: some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qualitative Research, 8(1): 91–113. [doi: 10.1177/1468794107085298]
26.
HorowitzA. D., and BROMNICKR. D. (2007). ‘Contestable adulthood’: Variability and disparity in markers for negotiating the transition to adulthood. Youth and Society, 39(2): 209–231. [doi: 10.1177/0044118X06296692]
27.
KindonS. (2003). Participatory video in geographic research: a feminist practice of looking. Area, 35(2): 142–153. [doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00236]
LathamA. (2003). Research, performance, and doing human geography: Some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment and Planning A, 35(11): 1993–2017. [doi: 10.1068/a3587]
30.
LawJ. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge.
31.
MackrillT. (2008). Solicited diary studies of psychotherapy in qualitative research - pros and cons. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 10(1): 5–18. [doi: 10.1080/13642530701869243]
32.
MarslandD., LEOUSSIA. S., and NORCROSSP. (1994). Disability abated: audio-cassettes for the visually impaired. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 114(1): 29–32. [doi: 10.1177/146642409411400106]
33.
MartinsonD. (2003). In the Presence of Audience: The Self in Diaries and Fiction, Columbus, Ohio State University Press.
34.
McgregorJ. (2006). Diaries and case studies. In DESAIV., & POTTERR. B. (eds.) Doing Development Research.Sage, London, pp. 204.
35.
MethP. (2003). Entries and omissions: using solicited diaries in geographical researchArea, 35(2): 195–205. [doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00263]
36.
MilliganC. (2005). Placing narrative correspondence in the geographer's toolbox: Insights from care research in New Zealand. New Zealand Geographer, 61: 213–224. [doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7939.2005.00035.x]
37.
MilliganC., BINGLEYA., and GATRELLA. (2005). Digging deep: using diary techniques to explore the place of health and well-being amongst older people. Social Science and Medicine, 61(9): 1882–1892. [doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.002]
38.
MonrouxeL. V. (2009). Solicited audio diaries in longitudinal narrative research: a view from inside. Qualitative Research, 9(1): 81–103. [doi: 10.1177/1468794108098032]
39.
Moran-EllisJ., and VENNS. (2007). The sleeping lives of children and teenagers: night-worlds and arenas of action. Sociological Research Online, 12(5). [doi: 10.5153/sro.1606]
40.
OchsE., and CAPPSL. (2001). Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
41.
PapadopoulosI., and SCANLONK. (2002). The use of audio diaries in a study with visually impaired people. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 96(6): 456–460.
PlummerK. (2001). Documents of Life 2, London, Sage.
44.
RicœurP. (1984). Time and Narrative Volume 1, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
45.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences, London, Sage.
46.
ShakespeareT. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs, London, Routledge.
47.
ShotterJ. (1993). Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through Language, London, Sage.
48.
SomersM. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23(5): 605–649. [doi: 10.1007/BF00992905]
49.
SquireC. (2008). Experience-centred and culturally-oriented approaches to narrative. In ANDREWSM., SQUIREC., & TAMBOUKOUM. (eds.) Doing Narrative ResearchLondon, Sage, pp. 41–63.
50.
SullivanO. (2000). The division of domestic labour: twenty years of change?Sociology, 34(3): 437–456.
WebsterL., and MERTOVAP. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: an introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching, Abingdon, Routledge.
55.
WilliamsonI., LYTTLES., JOHNSONS., and LEEMINGD. (2008). The benefits and drawbacks of using audio-diaries to capture lived experience: participants’ and researchers’ views. British Psychological Society's Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section.Leeds.
56.
WynJ., and DWYERP. (2000). New patterns of youth transition in education. International Social Science Journal, 52(164): 147–159. [doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00247]
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
