Narratives of the future can be seen as a form of colonialisation, structuring fields of discourse, in a process which Johan Galtung (cited in Andersson, 2006) refers to as ‘chronological imperialism’. However, futures narratives can also be used to disrupt these attempts at colonialisation through surfacing problematic assumptions in order to explore alternative scenarios. In this paper I first consider modal narratives and possible worlds and their relevance to the social sciences. I then discuss Sohail Inayatullah's ‘Causal Layered Analysis’ (CLA) - a narrative technique for constructing past and present and imagining the future. CLA draws on a ‘poststructural toolbox’ to examine problematic issues using a process which focuses on four levels of analysis: litany (the official public description of the issue); social science analysis (which attempts to articulate causal variables); discourse analysis or prevailing worldview; and myth/metaphor analysis. The aim is to disrupt current discourses which have become sedimented into practice and so open up space for the construction of alternative scenarios. In the third part I demonstrate how this approach can be used to examine ‘big issues’ taking as my example the current preoccupation with troubled and troublesome youth.
AitkenS.C. (2001). Global crises of childhood: rights, justice and the unchildlike child.Area, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 119–127. [doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00015]
3.
AldrovandiU. (1610). Ornithologiae.Frankfurt.
4.
AnderssonJ. (2006). Choosing futures: Alva Myrdal and the construction of Swedish Futures Studies, 1967-1972.International Review of Social History, Vol. 51, pp. 277–295. [doi: 10.1017/S0020859006002458]
5.
ArmstrongD. (2004). A Risky Business? Research, Policy, Governmentality and Youth Offending.Youth Justice, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 100. [doi: 10.1177/147322540400400203]
6.
Barnardo'S (2008) Breaking the cycle. Believe in children.Ilford, Essex: Barnardo's.
7.
BaumanZ. (2008) The absence of society.The Social Evils Series. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
BoothC., ROWLINSONM., CLARKP., DELAHAYEA., and PROCTERS. (2008). Scenarios and counterfactuals as modal narratives.Futures, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.037.
10.
De CerteauM. (1988) The practice of everyday life.Berkely and Los Angeles. London: University of California Press.
DeleuzeG. (1995) Negotiations.New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
DeleuzeG., and GUATTARIF. (2004 [1972]) Anti-oedipus. Capitalism and schizophrenia.London: Athlone Press.
14.
DoleželL. (1998) Heterocosmica. Fiction and possible worlds.Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.
15.
DuncombeS. (2007) Re-imagining progressive politics in an age of fantasy.London: The New Press.
16.
EhliassonK. (2007). Futures studies as social science: An analytic scheme and a case study.Futures, Vol. 40, pp. 489–502. [doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2007.10.007]
17.
FarringtonD. (1996) Understanding and preventing youth crime. Social Policy Research 93. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
18.
GidleyJ. (2005). Giving hope back to our young people: Creating a new spiritual mythology for Western culture.Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 17–30.
19.
GirouxH. (2006) America on the Edge: Henry Giroux on Politics, Culture, and Education.Gordonsville, VA, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GoldingW. (1954) Lord of the Flies.London: Faber and Faber.
21.
HardtM., and NEGRIA. (2000) Empire.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
22.
HerzJ.H. (1966). Review of History and futurology, by Ossip K. Flechtheim.The American Political Science Review, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 1019–1020.
23.
HuxleyA. (2004[1932]) Brave New World.London: Vintage.
24.
InayatullahS. (2004) Causal layered analysis: theory, historical context, and case studies. In: InayatullahS., (editor), The causal layered analysis (CLA) reader. Theory and case studies of an integrative and transformative methodology.Taiwan: Tamkang University Press, pp. 8–49. <http://www.metafuture.org/Books/causal_layered_analysis_reader.htm>
25.
InayatullahS. (1998b). Macrohistory and futures studies.Futures, Vol. 30, pp. 381–394. [doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(98)00043-3]
26.
InayatullahS. (1998a). Causal layered analysis Poststructuralism as method.Futures, Vol. 30, pp. 815–829. [doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(98)00086-X]
27.
JeffsT., and SMITHM.K. (1999). The Problem of’ Youth for Youth Work.Youth and Policy, Vol. 62, pp. 45–66.
28.
JouvenelB.D. (1967) The art of conjecture.London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
29.
KatzC. (2008). Cultural Geographies lecture: Childhood as spectacle: relays of anxiety and the reconfiguration of the child.Cultural Geographies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 5–17. [doi: 10.1177/1474474007085773]
30.
KellyP. (2006). The Entrepreneurial Self and ‘Youth at-risk’: Exploring the Horizons of Identity in the Twenty-first Century.Journal of Youth Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 17–32. [doi: 10.1080/13676260500523606]
31.
KingM. (2007). The Sociology of Childhood as Scientific Communication: Observations from a social systems perspective.Childhood, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 193. [doi: 10.1177/0907568207078327]
32.
LaclauE., and MOUFFEC. (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy.London: Verso.
33.
MairaS., and SOEPE. (2004). United States of Adolescence?: Reconsidering US Youth Culture Studies.Young, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 245. [doi: 10.1177/1103308804044508]
34.
MalesM. (1999)Scapegoat generation: America's war on adolescents.Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
35.
MandevilleB.D. (1714)The fable of the bees. Or, private vices, publick benefits.London: J. Roberts.
36.
McquillanM. (editor) (2000) The Narrative Reader.London and New York: Routledge.
37.
MilestoneJ. (2007). Design as Power: Paul Virilio and the Governmentality of Design Expertise.Culture, Theory and Critique, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 175–198. [doi: 10.1080/14735780701723264]
38.
MorrowR. (2007). What is the Debate around Paid Maternity Leave Really about? Using CLA to Delve under the Surface.Journal of Futures Studies, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 59–76.
39.
NolanW.F., and CLAYTON JOHNSONG. (1967) Logan's run.USA: Dial Press.
40.
PhelanJ. (2006). Rhetorical aesthetics and other issues in the study of literary narrative.Narrative Inquiry, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 85–93. [doi: 10.1075/ni.16.1.12phe]
41.
PolakF. (1961) The image of the future. Volume II.New York: Oceana Publications.
42.
PortesA. (1998). SOCIAL CAPITAL: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.Annual Reviews in Sociology, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1–24. [doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1]
43.
PryorJ. (2006) Beyond demography: history, ritual and families in the twenty-first century. Blue Skies Report 7/06 edn. New Zealand: Families Commission.
44.
RittelH.W.J., and WEBBERM.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning.Policy Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 155–169. [doi: 10.1007/BF01405730]
45.
SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE (2004) A Curriculum for Excellence.Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
46.
StephensonS. (2001). Street children in Moscow: using and creating social capital.The Sociological review, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 530–547. [doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00346]
47.
ThrakeS. (2008) Individualism and consumerism: reframing the debate.The Social Evils Series. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Handbook for Teaching in a New Century.PescosolidoB., & AminzadeR. (Eds) Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press, pp. 256–270.
50.
TillyC. (1990). How (and What) Are Historians Doing?American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 685. [doi: 10.1177/0002764290033006005]
51.
TorfingJ. (1999) New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek.Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
VadimR. (1968) Barbarella.USA: Paramount.
53.
VirilioP. (2007) The original accident.Cambridge: Polity Press.
54.
WaltersR., and WOODWARDR. (2007). Punishing ‘Poor Parents’: ‘Respect’, ‘Responsibility’ and Parenting Orders in Scotland.Youth Justice, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 5–20. [doi: 10.1177/1473225406074818]
55.
WaltonJ.S. (2008). Scanning Beyond the Horizon: Exploring the Ontological and Epistemological Basis for Scenario Planning.Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 147–165. [doi: 10.1177/1523422307304101]
