Battles over Biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the Politics of Markets

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that a consortium of NGOs has played a significant role in shaping the market for, and restricting the use of, biofuels as an alternative to conventional fuels for road transport in Europe. This paper considers why a number of NGOs (Greenpeace, Oxfam, WWF, RSPB, Friends of the Earth) have chosen to enter the biofuels debate, and how they have variously developed policy, agreed a political campaign, and exercised political influence, in a key area of the world's response to major global climate change: how to reduce the carbon footprint of transport.

We found that in many cases the development of NGO policy has been driven more by narrow political opportunities for influence than by broader and more coherent policy responses to global climate change or economic development, or indeed rigorous assessment of the scientific evidence. The research provides evidence of how NGO policies and lobbying significantly affected biofuel policy changes, review processes, target reductions, and sustainability regulation in the UK and in Europe.

We consider that politically instituted markets, such as the one for biofuels, are examples of the emergence of new forms of governance of capitalist political economies facing a novel and pressing combination of drivers (climate change, energy security, resource constraints, and sustainable land-use). Politically instituted markets open up possibilities for political intervention from non-governmental or party-political actors, in ways that other markets do not. If political shaping of markets by NGOs becomes more widespread, issues of democratic legitimacy and public scrutiny will become ever more pressing.

The paper is based on in-depth interviews with senior scientific directors and policy-makers in five NGOs, and of senior officials in UK government departments and the European Commission (DG Environment and DG Transport and Energy). It forms part of a wider ESRC research project in Brazil, the USA and Europe on the Transition to Sustainable Bioeconomies.

Keywords

NGO Biofuels Europe Policy Markets Transport

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ANSELL

, MAXWELL

, and SICURELLI

(2006) ‘Protesting Food: NGOs and Political Mobilisation in Europe’, in Ansell

, and Vogel

(editors) What's the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

BAILEY

(2008) ‘Time to Put the Brakes on Biofuels’, The Guardian Newspaper, 4 July, 2008.

BARTA

(2008) ‘As Biofuels Catch On, Next Task is to Deal with Environmental, Economic Impact’, New York: Wall Street Journal, 24 March, 2008.

BLOCK

(2003) ‘Karl Polanyi and the Writing of the Great Transformation’, Theory and Society, Vol. 32, pp. 275–306. [doi: 10.1023/A: 1024420102334]

CALLON

(2007) ‘What Does it Mean to Say that Economics is Performative?’, in McKenzie

, Muniesa

, and Siu

(editors) Do Economists Make Markets. On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 310–357.

DOORNBOSCH

, and STEENBLICK

(2007) ‘Biofuels: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease?’ OECD Round Table on Sustainable Development, Paris, 11-12 September, 2007.

EBIO (2008) ‘The Truth about Food and Fuel’, Brussels: eBIO, <http://www.ebio.org/food_fuel.php>.

EC RENEWABLE ENERGY DIRECTIVE (2009) ‘Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources’, Official Journal of the European Union, Vol. 140, pp. 16–62, <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ: L: 2009: 140: 0016: 0062: EN: PDF>.

EREC (2008) ‘EREC Position Paper on Biofuels: A Critical Energy Source and a Historic Opportunity for the EU’, Brussels: European Renewable Energy Council.

10.

FARGIONE

, HILL

, TILMAN

, POLASKY

, and HAWTHORNE

(2008) ‘Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt’, Science, Vol. 319, pp. 1235–1238. [doi: 10.1126/science.1152747]

11.

FLIGSTEIN

(2001) The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

12.

FLIGSTEIN

, and MARA-DRITA

(1996) ‘How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 102, No. 1, pp. 1–33. [doi: 10.1086/230907]

13.

FLIGSTEIN

, and SWEET

A. S.

(2002) ‘Constructing Polities and Markets: An Institutionalist Account of European Integration’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 107, No. 5, pp. 1206–43. [doi: 10.1086/341907]

14.

FOE (2008a) ‘Fuelling Destruction in Latin America: The Real Price of the Drive for Agrofuels’, Amsterdam: Friends of the Earth International, Issue 113, September 2008.

15.

FOE (2008b) ‘Agrofuels: Fuelling or Fooling Europe? The Problem of Using Plant-Based Oils in Power Stations and Vehicles‘, Brussels: Friends of the Earth Europe, February 2008.

16.

FOE (2008c) ‘Stop the Biofuels Targets’, London: Friends of the Earth UK, <http://www.foe.org.uk/campaigns/biodiversity/press_for_change/biofuels/index.html>.

17.

FOE NETHERLANDS (2010) ‘Too Green to be True: IOI Corporation in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan’, Amsterdam: Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie) and Belgium: Friends of the Earth Europe.

18.

FRENCH AUTHORITIES (2008) ‘Report assessing actions taken to promote biofuels in France in 2007’, Brussels: European Biodiesel Board <http://www.ebb-eu.org/legislation.php>.

19.

GOVERNMENT OF GERMANY (2008) ‘Fifth National Report on the Implementation of Directive 2003/30/EC of 8 May 2003 on the Promotion of the Use of Biofuels or other Renewable Fuels for Transport’, Brussels: European Biodiesel Board <http://www.ebb-eu.org/legislation.php>.

20.

GRANOVETTER

(1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 481–510. [doi: 10.1086/228311]

21.

GRANOVETTER

, and MCGUIRE

(1998) ‘The Making of an Industry: Electricity in the United States’, in Callon

(editor) The Laws of the Markets, Oxford: Blackwell Press, pp 147–173.

22.

GREENPEACE (2002) ‘Electric Vehicles’, London: Greenpeace UK, 22 August, 2002, <http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/climate/electric-vehicles>

23.

GREENPEACE (2007a) ‘Biofuels: Green Dream or Climate Change Nightmare?’ London: Greenpeace UK, 9 May, 2007.

24.

GREENPEACE (2007b) ‘Cooking the Climate’, London: Greenpeace, November 2007.

25.

GREENPEACE (2008) ‘Gallagher Biofuels Review - Greenpeace Responds’, London: Greenpeace UK, 8 July, 2008.

26.

GREENPEACE (2009a) ‘Electric Dreams’, London: Greenpeace UK, 16 April, 2009, http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/climate/electric-dreams-20090416

27.

GREENPEACE (2009b) ‘Illegal Forest Clearance and RSPO Greenwash: Case Studies of Sinar Mas’, London: Greenpeace UK, December 2009.

28.

GREENPEACE, OXFAM, RSPB and FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, (2008) ‘Media Brief - Gallagher Review to be published Early July’, London: Greenpeace UK, 7 July, 2008.

29.

HARVEY

(2007) ‘Instituting economic processes in society’, in Harvey

, Ramlogan

, and Randles

(editors) Karl Polanyi: New Perspectives on the Place of the Economy in Society. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

30.

HARVEY

(editor) (2010) Markets, Rules and Institutions of Exchange. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

31.

HARVEY

, and MCMEEKIN

(2010) ‘The political shaping of transitions to biofuels in the USA, Brazil and Europe’, Working Paper, Manchester: Centre for Research in Economic Sociology and Innovation, Manchester University.

32.

HILHORST

(2003) The Real World of NGOs. London: Zed Books.

33.

HODGSON

(2007) ‘The Enforcement of Contracts and Property Rights: Constitutive versus Epiphenomenal Conceptions of Law’, in Harvey

, Ramlogan

, and Randles

(editors) Karl Polanyi: New Perspectives on the Place of the Economy in Society. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Manchester, pp. 95–129.

34.

HUDSON

(2002) ‘Advocacy by UK-Based Development NGOs’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 402, <http://nvs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/31/3/402>.

35.

IIASA/OFID, (2009) ‘Biofuels and Food Security’, OFID Pamphlet Series, No. 38, March 2009.

36.

IPCC (2007) ‘Climate Change Mitigation. Chapter 8. Agriculture’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

37.

JEPSON

(2005) ‘Governance and Accountability of Environmental NGOs’, Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 8, pp. 515–524. [doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.006]

38.

JORDAN

, and VAN TUIJL

(2000) ‘Political Responsibility in Transnational NGO Advocacy’, World Development, Vol. 28, No. 12, pp. 2051–2065. [doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00078-4]

39.

KAMMEN

D. M.

, FARRELL

A. E.

, PLEVIN

R. J.

, JONES

A. D.

, NEMET

G. F.

, and DELUCCHI

M. A.

(2008) ‘Energy and Greenhouse Impacts of Biofuels: A Framework for Analysis’. Berkley: UC Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Centre Report.

40.

KIM

, KIM

, and DALE

B.E.

(2009) ‘Biofuels, Land Use Change, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Some Unexplored Variables’, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 961–967. [doi: 10.1021/es802681k]

41.

KNORR CETINA

, and PREDA

(2005) The Sociology of Financial Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

42.

KRIPPNER

(2001) ‘The Elusive Market: Embeddedness and the Paradigm of Economic Sociology’, Theory and Society, Vol. 30, pp. 775–810. [doi: 10.1023/A: 1013330324198]

43.

LISKA

A. J.

, and PERRIN

R. K.

(2009) ‘Indirect Land Use Emissions in the Life Cycle of Biofuels: Regulation vs Science’ Biofuels, Bioproducts, and Biorefining, Vol. 3, pp. 318–328. [doi: 10.1002/bbb.153]

44.

MATHEWS

J. A.

, and TAN

(2009). ‘Biofuels and Indirect Land Use Change Effects: The Debate Continues’, Biofuels, Bioproducts, and Biorefining, Vol. 3, pp. 305–317. [doi: 10.1002/bbb.147]

45.

MCKENZIE

(2006) An Engine Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge. Mass.: MIT Press.

46.

MORAN

(2008) ‘Who Should Take the Blame for the Biofuels Tragedy?’ IPA Review, September 2008, pp. 33.

47.

OXFAM (2008a) ‘Another Inconvenient Truth: How Biofuel Policies are Deepening Poverty and Accelerating Climate Change’, Oxfam International Briefing Paper 114, 25 June, 2008.

48.

OXFAM (2008b) ‘Response of Oxfam GB to the Gallagher Review’, Oxford: Oxfam GB, <http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/climatechange/gallagher_response-1.pdf>.

49.

RENEWABLE FUELS AGENCY (2008) ‘The Gallagher Review of the Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production’, Renewable Fuels Agency, UK, July 2008.

50.

RSPB (2008a) ‘Act Now to Stop Biofuel Madness’, 6 June, 2008, <http://www.respb.org.uk/news/details.asp?view=print&=tcm:9-191597>.

51.

RSPB (2008b) ‘A Cool Approach to Biofuels’, UK, Bedfordshire: RSPB, April 2008.

52.

RSPB (2008c) ‘RSPB Warning over Biofuels Policy’, <http://environment.uk.msn.com/news/headlines/article.aspx?cp-documentid=7640252>.

53.

RSPB (2008d) ‘Biofuels’, <http://www.rspb.org.uk/supporting/campaigns/biofuels/index.asp?view=print>.

54.

SEARCHINGER

, HEIMLICH

, HOUGHTON

R. A.

, DONG

, ELOBEID

, FABIOSA

, TOKGOZ

, HAYES

, and YU

(2008) ‘Use of US Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases through Emissions from Land-Use Change’, Science, Vol. 319, pp. 1238–1240. [doi: 10.1126/science.1151861]

55.

SIMMONS

P.J.

(1998) ‘Learning to Live with NGOs’, Foreign Policy, Fall 1998, pp. 82–96. [doi: 10.2307/1149037]

56.

SLIM

(2002) ‘By What Authority? The Legitimacy and Accountability of Non-Governmental Organisations’, Presented at The International Council on Human Rights Policy International Meeting on Global Trends and Human Rights, Geneva, 10-12 January, 2002.

57.

SWEDBERG

(2003) ‘The Case for an Economic Sociology of Kaw’, Theory and Society, Vol. 32, pp. 1–37. [doi: 10.1023/A: 1023005905397]

58.

SWEDBERG

(2005) ‘The Economic Sociology of Capitalism: An Introduction and Agenda’, in Nee

, and Swedberg

(editors) The Economic Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

59.

SWEDISH GOVERNMENT (2008) ‘Report Pursuant to Directive 2003/30/EC of 8 May 2003 on the Promotion of the Use of Biofuels or other Renewable Fuels for Transport’, Brussels: European Biodiesel Board <http://www.ebb-eu.org/legislation.php>.

60.

TILMAN

, SOCOLOW

, FOLEY

J.A.

, HILL

, LARSON

, LYND

, PACALA

, REILLY

, SEARCHINGER

, SOMMERVILLE

, and WILLIAMS

(2009) ‘Beneficial biofuels - the food, energy and environment trilemma’, Science, 17 July, 325, 270-1.

61.

UK DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (2008) ‘UK Report to the European Commission under Article 4 of the Biofuels Directive (2003/30/EC)’, Brussels: European Biodiesel Board <http://www.ebb-eu.org/legislation.php>.

62.

VAN DEN BELT

(2003) ‘Debating the Precautionary Principle: Guilty until Proven Innocent or Innocent until Proven Guilty?’ Plant Physiology, Vol. 132, pp. 1122–1126. [doi: 10.1104/pp.103.023531]

63.

VIDAL

(2008) ‘Coal's Return Raises Pollution Threat’, The Observer Newspaper, 23 November, 2008.

64.

WIGGINS

(2009) ‘Food Price Spike 2007/8: Is the System Broken?’ Presented at the World Food Crisis and the Global South, University of London, 27 January, 2009.

65.

WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE (2005) Navigating the numbers: greenhouse gas data and international climate change policy. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.

66.

WWF (2007a) ‘RSPB, WWF, Greenpeace, Oxfam and Friends of the Earth Joint Statement on Biofuels’, Surrey: WWF-UK, 20 March, 2007.

67.

WWF (2007b) ‘Green Fuels could be bad for the Planet, say Environmental and Development Groups’, Surrey: WWF-UK, 19 March, 2007.

68.

WWF (2008a) ‘Plugged In: The End of the Oil Age’, Brussels: WWF European Policy Office, March 2008.

69.

WWF (2008b) ‘WWF Position Paper on Bioenergy’, Brussels: WWF International, June 2008.

70.

WWF GERMANY (2007) ‘Rain Forest for Biodiesel: Ecological Effects of using Palm Oil as a Source of Energy’, Frankfurt/Main: WWF Germany.