Death as a Fateful Moment? The Reflexive Individual and Scottish Funeral Practices

Abstract

Death is considered by some commentators to be problematic for the inhabitants of a late modern era, so that when individuals are confronted by death they revert to using traditional institutions and practices. This paper draws on sociological research exploring Scottish funeral practices to consider whether this is the case, or whether individuals are able to employ a process of self-reflexivity even when they are planning the funeral of someone about whom they cared. Two funerals are described in the article, and the suggestion is made that their organisers behaved some of the time as reflexive individuals as well as also making use of the traditional authorities of modernity, such as the family and church.

Keywords

Abstract Systems Death Fateful Moments Reflexive Individual Scottish Funeral Practices Self-Reflexivity Traditional Institutions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ADAMS

(2003) ‘The reflexive self and culture: a critique’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 54, no. 2 pp. 221–238. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/0007131032000080212]

ARNASON

(2000) ‘Biography, bereavement, story’, Mortality, Vol. 5 no. 2 pp. 189–204. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/713686003]

BEREAVEMENT UK (2010) Welcome to Bereavement UK. http://www.bereavement.co.uk/index.html

BERGER

P L

(1967) The Sacred Canopy. New York: Anchor Books.

BROWN

C G

(2001) The Death of Christian Britain. London: Routledge.

CORDEN

, HURST

, and NICE

(2008) Financial Implications of the Death of a Partner. < http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/research/pdf/Bereavement.pdf

DAVIE

(1994) Religion in Britain since 1945: believing without belonging. Oxford: Blackwell.

DRAKEFORD

(1998) ‘Last Rights? Funerals, Poverty and Social Exclusion’, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 27, no. 4 pp. 507–524. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/S0047279498005376]

EMKE

(2002) ‘Why the sad face? Secularization and the changing function of funerals in Newfoundland’, Mortality, Vol. 7, no. 3 pp. 269–284. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1357627021000025432]

10.

GARCES-FOLEY

, and HOLCOMB

(2006) Contemporary American funerals: personalizing tradition. In Garces-Foley

(Ed.) Death and religion in a changing world. Armonk, NY: M E Sharpe. Pp. 207–227.

11.

GIDDENS

(1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

12.

GIDDENS

(1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

13.

GILDING

(2010) ‘Reflexivity over and above convention: the new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 61, no. 4 pp. 757–777. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01340.x]

14.

GONE TOO SOON (nd) Create a memorial. http://www.gonetoosoon.org/create_memorial/

15.

HOWARTH

(1996) Last Rites. Amityville, NY: Baywood.

16.

HOWARTH

(2007) Death & Dying, a sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

17.

JOHNSTONE-BURT

, GIBBS

, and WYNBURNE

(2005) The complete book of funeral planning, readings and music. London: Foulsham.

18.

LASH

(1994) Reflexivity and its Doubles: Structure, Aesthetics, Community. In Beck

, Giddens

, and Lash

Reflexive Modernization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Pp. 110–173.

19.

LEE

R M

(1993) Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.

20.

MORRELL

, and SMITH

(2006) We need to talk about the funeral. Bedlinog: Accent Press Limited.

21.

MOUZELIS

(1999) Exploring post-traditional orders: individual reflexivity, ‘pure relations’ and duality of structure. In O'Brien

, Penna

, and Hay

(Eds.) Theorizing Modernity. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman Limited. Pp. 83–97.

22.

MY LAST SONG (2010) Funeral Planning. http://www.mylastsong.com/advice/148/107/funerals/funeral-planning/

23.

PARSONS

(2003) ‘Conflict in the context of care: an examination of role conflict between the bereaved and the funeral director in the UK’, Mortality, Vol. 8, no. 1 pp. 67–87. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1357627021000063133]

24.

RICHARDS

(2005) Handling qualitative data, a practical guide. London: Sage.

25.

SCHÄFER

(2007) ‘Post-mortem personalization: pastoral power and the New Zealand funeral director’, Mortality, Vol. 12, no. 1 pp. 4–21. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13576270601088319]

26.

SMITH

(2009) ‘The Church of Scotland and the Funeral Industry in Nineteenth-century Edinburgh’, The Scottish Historical Review, Vol. 88, no. 225, pp. 108–133.

27.

TAYLOR-GOOBY

(2005) ‘Pervasive Uncertainty in Second Modernity: an Empirical Test’ Sociological Research Online, Volume 10, Issue 4.

28.

THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND (2011) About Us. http://www.churchofscotland.org.uk/about_us

29.

THURBER

(1945) The Secret Life of Walter Mitty. London: Penguin Books.

30.

WALTER

(1994) The Revival of Death. London: Routledge.

31.

WALTER

(1996) ‘A new model of grief: bereavement and biography’, Mortality, Vol. 1, no. 1 pp. 7–25. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/713685822]

32.

WALTER

(1999) On Bereavement, the Culture of Grief. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

33.

WIENRICH

, and SPEYER

(2003) The Natural Death Handbook. London: Rider.