This paper compares and contrasts some of the conceptual language used to engage with the realm of family and personal life within the parallel fields of transnational family studies (TFS) and British family studies (BFS). Key concepts which are now widely referenced within BFS - such as ‘family practices’, ‘family display’, ‘families of choice’ and ‘connectedness' - have not been widely drawn upon within TFS. Instead, TFS scholars are developing alternative concepts such as ‘ways of being' versus ‘ways of belonging' and ‘frontiering and relativising’, often to capture very similar ideas to those current within BFS. This paper critically explores some of the concepts currently being used within transnational family studies, highlighting points of similarity and difference with the BFS tradition, and considers what these parallel literatures might learn from each other. The paper is illustrated by examples drawn from ESRC-funded research on the experiences of post-accession Polish migrants living in the UK.
ALMACKK (2008) ‘Display work: lesbian parent couples and their families of origin negotiating new kin relationships’, Sociology, 42 (6): 1183–99. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0038038508096940]
2.
BAILEYA, & BoyleP, (2004) ‘Untying and retying family migration in the New Europe’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30 (2): 229–41. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1369183042000200678]
3.
BALDASSERL., BaldockC.V., & WildingR. (2007) Families Caring Across Borders: Migration, Ageing and Transnational Caregiving.Basingstoke: Palgrave.
4.
BRYCESOND., & VuorelaU. (2002) The Transnational Family: New European Frontiers and Global Networks.Oxford: Berg.
5.
CASTLESS., & MillerM. (2009) The Age of Migration: International Population Movement in the Modern World: Fourth Edition.Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan.
6.
CONSTABLEN. (2004) Cross-Border Marriages: Gender and Mobility in Transnational Asia.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
GABBJ. (2011) ‘Troubling displays: the affect of gender, sexuality and class’, in SeymourJ., and DermottE. (eds) Displaying Families: A New Concept for the Sociology of Family Life.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
GLICK SCHILLERN., BaschL, & Blanc-SzantonC (eds) (1992) Towards a Transnational Perspective on Migration: Race, class, ethnicity and nationalism reconsidered.New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
10.
GOULBOURNEH., ReynoldsT., SolomosJ., and ZontiniE. (2010) Transnational Families: Ethnicities, Identities and Social Capital.London: Routledge.
11.
HEAPHYB., (2011) ‘Critical relational displays’, in SeymourJ., and DermottE. (eds) Displaying Families: A New Concept for the Sociology of Family Life.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
KOFMANE (2004) ‘Family-related migration: a critial review of European Studies’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30 (2): 243–62. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1369183042000200687]
13.
LEVITTP, & Glick SchillerN. (2004) ‘Conceptualising simultaneity: a transnational social field perspective on society’, International Migration Review, 38 (3): 1001–39.
14.
LEVITTP, & WatersM. (2002) The Changing Face of Home; The Transational Lives of the Second Generation.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
MAIN., & KingR. (2009) ‘Love, sexuality and migration: mapping the issue(s)’, Mobilities, 4 (3): 295–307. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/17450100903195318]
16.
MANDICS. (2008) ‘Home-leaving and its structural determinants in Western and Eastern Europe: an exploratory study’, Housing Studies, 23 (4): 615–37. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/02673030802112754]
17.
MCSHERRYC (2001) Who Owns Academic Work? Battling for Control of Intellectual Property.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18.
METYKOVAM (2010) ‘Only a mouse click away from home: transnational practices of Eastern European migrants in the United Kingdom’, Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 16 (3): 325–38.
19.
MORGAND. (1996) Family Connections.Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
MORGAND. (2011) Rethinking Family Practices.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1057/9780230304680]
21.
MOSKALM (2011) ‘Transnationalism and the role of family and children in intra-European labour migration’, European Societies, 13 (1): 29–50. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/14616696.2010.497225]
PORTESA., GuarnizoL, and LandoldtP. (1999) ‘The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22 (2): 242–82. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/014198799329468]
26.
PORTESA, and RumbautR (eds) (2001) Ethnicities: Children of Immigrants in America.Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
RABIKOWSKAM (2010) ‘The ritualisation of food, home and national identity among Polish migrants in London’Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 16(3): 377–98.
28.
ROBERTSK. (2009) Youth in Transition: Eastern Europe and the West.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
RYANL., SalesR., TilkiM., and SiaraB. (2009) ‘Family strategies and transnational migration: recent Polish migrants in London’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies35(1): 61–77. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13691830802489176]
30.
SEYMOURJ, and DermottE. (2011) Displaying Families: A New Concept for the Sociology of Family Life.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
SMARTC. (2007) Personal Life.Cambridge: Polity.
32.
STRATHERNM (2003) Commons and Borderlands.Wantage: Sean Kingston Publishing.
33.
TORUNCZYK-RUIZS. (2008) ‘Being together or apart? Social networksandnotionsof belonging among recent Polish migrants in the Netherlands’, CMR Working Papers, No. 40/98. Warsaw: Centre of Migration Research.
34.
URRYJ. (2000) Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century.London: Routledge.
35.
VERTOVECS. (2004) ‘Migrant transnationalism and mode of transformation’, International Migration Review, 38 (3): 970–1001. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00226.x]
36.
WEEKSJ., HeaphyB., and DonovanC. (2001) Same-Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments.London: Routledge. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.4324/9780203167168]
37.
WHITEA. (2010) ‘Young people and migration from contemporary Poland’, Journal of Youth Studies, 13 (5): 565–80. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13676261.2010.487520]
38.
WHITEA. (2011) Polish Families and Migration Since EU Accession.Bristol: Policy Press.
39.
WILDINGR. (2006) ‘“Virtual” intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts’, Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 6 (2): 125–42.
