This study addresses how political attitudes are shaped across national contexts. It does so by investigating the influence of nation-specific political articulation and framing on the relationship between human values and political attitudes. Based on the literature, two attitude dimensions can be identified. First, the socioeconomic dimension captures the tension between economic equality and equity (rewarding achievements and effort). Second, the sociocultural dimension captures the tension between individual/civil liberties and traditions/conservative norms. Very few comparative studies systematically investigate the influence of a coherent structure of more basic and abstract motivations (values) on political attitudes. We fill this gap by examining the influence of basic human values on the socioeconomic and sociocultural attitude dimensions across national contexts. To investigate the impact of human values and political attitudes, individual-level data from the European Social Survey (ESS 2008) from 2008 are analyzed using multi-group structural equation modeling (MGSEM). Moreover, we also explore political discourse as a key contextual factor at the country level modifying the relationships between values and attitudes. Specifically, we use data from the Comparative Manifesto Project to investigate the moderating influence of political articulation, i.e., the articulation of socioeconomic and sociocultural issues in political party manifestos, on the relationship between values and political attitudes across countries. Results indicate substantial cross-national variation in the link between values and sociopolitical attitudes, and that this variation can be partly explained by the articulation of sociopolitical issues.
AjzenI. (2001). Nature and Operation of Attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (1), 27–58. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27]
2.
BarneaM. F. (2003). Personal Values and Party Orientations in different Cultures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
3.
BarneaM., & SchwartzS. H. (1998). Values and Voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17–40. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/0162-895X.00090]
4.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological bulletin, 107 (2), 238. Available from: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1990-13755-001 [Accessed 12 October 2013]
5.
BowlesS., & GintisH. (2000). Reciprocity, self-interest, and the welfare state. Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 26. Available from: http://www.nopecjournal.org/NOPEC_2000_a02.pdf [Accessed 12 October 2013]
6.
BrooksC., & ManzaJ. (2007). Why welfare states persist: the importance of public opinion in democracies. University of Chicago Press.
7.
BudgeIan, KlingemannHans-Dieter, VolkensAndrea, BaraJudith, TanenbaumEric with FordingRichard C., HearlDerek J., KimHee Min, McDonaldMichael D., MendesSylvia M. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
ConverseP. E. (1964). The Nature of Mass Belief Systems. In ApterD. E. (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.
9.
CusackT., IversenT., & RehmP. (2006). Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22 (3), 365–389. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/oxrep/grj022]
10.
DavidovE., & MeulemanB. (2012). Explaining Attitudes Towards Immigration Policies in European Countries: The Role of Human Values. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38 (5), 757–775. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1369183X.2012.667985]
11.
DavidovE. (2010). Testing for Comparability of Human Values across Countries and Time with the third Round of the European Social Survey. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 51 (3), 171–191. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0020715210363534]
12.
DavidovE. (2008). A Cross-Country and Cross-Time Comparison of the Human Values Measurements with the Second Round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 2 (1), 33–46. Available from: https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/365/1297. [Accessed 5 April 2013]
13.
DavidovE., MeulemanB., BillietJ., & SchmidtP. (2008a). Values and Support for Immigration: A Cross-Country Comparison. European Sociological Review, 24 (5), 583–599. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/esr/jcn020]
14.
DavidovE., SchmidtP., & SchwartzS. H. (2008b). Bringing Values Back In: The Adequacy of the European Social Survey to Measure Values in 20 Countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72 (3), 420. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/poq/nfn035]
15.
EaglyA. H., & ChaikenS. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
16.
ESS Round 3: European Social Survey Round 3 Data (2006). Data file edition 3. 4. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway-Data Archive and distributor of ESS data.
17.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior?: an introduction to theory and research (p. xi, 578 p.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
18.
FehrE., & FischbacherU. (2002). Why social preferences matter-the impact of non?selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. The economic journal, 112 (478), C1–C33. [doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00027]
19.
FeldmanS., & ZallerJ. (1992). The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State. American Journal of Political Science, 36 (1), 268–307. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/2111433]
20.
FeldmanS. (2003). Values, identity, and the structure of political attitudes. In SearsD. O., HuddyL., & JerviesR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of social psychology (p. 477–508). New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
FeldmanS. (1988). Structure and Consistency in Public-Opinion: the Role of Core Beliefs and Values. American Journal of Political Science, 32 (2), 416–440. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/10.2307/2111130]
22.
GintisH., BowlesS., BoydR., & FehrE. (2005). Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life. Economic learning and social evolution.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
23.
HitlinS. (2003). Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links between two Theories of Self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66 (2), 118–137. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/1519843]
24.
HitlinS., & PiliavinJ. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant Concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359–393. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/29737698]
25.
IversenT., & SoskiceD. W. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science, 95 (4), 875–893.
26.
JacobyW. G. (2000). Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending. American Journal of Political Science, 750–767. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/2669279]
27.
KinderDonald R. (1998). Opinion and Action in the Realm of Politics. In GilbertD.; FiskeS. T.; LindzeyG. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology. Oxford University Press.
28.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
29.
KlingemannHans-Dieter, VolkensAndrea, BudgeIan, BaraJudith, and McDonaldMichael D. (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Parties, Electorates and Governments in Eastern Europe and the OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
KnoppenD., & SarisW. E. (2009). Do we have to combine Values in the Schwartz’ Human Values Scale? A Comment on the Davidov Studies. Survey Research Methods, 3 (2), 91–103. Available from: https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/download/2601/2778. [Accessed 5 April 2013]
31.
KulinJ., & SvallforsS. (2013). Class, Values, and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: A European Comparison. European Sociological Review, 29 (2), 155–167. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/esr/jcr046] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/esr/jcr046]
32.
KulinJ. (2011) Values and welfare state attitudes: The interplay between human values, attitudes and redistributive institutions across national contexts. PhD thesis. Umeå: Umeå University. Avalaible from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-49853 [Accessed 12 April 2013]
33.
KumlinS. (2004). The Personal and the Political: How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology (p. 260). Palgrave Macmillan. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1057/9781403980274]
34.
KumlinS., & SvallforsS. (2008). Social Stratification and Political Articulation: Why Attitudinal Class Differences Vary Across Countries. Luxemburg Income Study Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 484. Available from: http://www.lisproject.org/publications/liswps/484.pdf. [Accessed 5 April 2013]
35.
LipsetS. M., & RokkanS. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
36.
LipsetS. M. (1979). The first new nation: The United States in historical and comparative perspective. New York: Norton.
37.
MauS. (2003). The Moral Economy of Welfare States: Britain and Germany Compared. (RhodesM. & FerreraM., Eds.) Social Research (p. 238). New York, London: Routledge.
38.
MccloskyH., & ZallerJ. (1984). The American Ethos: Public Attitudes toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
MettlerS., & SossJ. (2004). The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2 (1), 55–73. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017.S1537592704000623] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/S1537592704000623]
40.
MeltzerA., & RichardS. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. The Journal of Political Economy, 89 (5), 914–927. Avaiable at: https://www-jstor-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/1830813 [Accessed 12 October 2013] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1086/261013]
41.
PiersonP. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics, 45 (4), 595–628. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/2950710] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/2950710]
42.
PiurkoY., SchwartzS. H., & DavidovE. (2011). Basic Personal Values and the Meaning of Left-Right Political Orientations in 20 Countries. Political Psychology, 32 (4), 537–561. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x]
43.
RevelleW., & ZinbargR. E. (2008). Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74 (1), 145–154. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z]
44.
RohanM. (2000). A Rose by any Name? The Values Construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4]
45.
RokeachM. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
RokeachM. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
47.
RothsteinB. (1998). Just institutions matter: the moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge University Press. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/CBO9780511598449]
48.
SagivL., & SchwartzS. H. (2007). Cultural Values in Organisations: Insights for Europe. European Journal of International Management, 1 (3), 176–190. Available from: http://inderscience.metapress.com/content/t76855265p328878/fulltext.pdf. [Accessed 5 April 2013] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1504/EJIM.2007.014692]
49.
SarisW. E., & SnidermanP. M. (2004). Studies in Public Opinion. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
50.
SchmidtP., BambergS., DavidovE., HerrmannJ., & SchwartzS. H. (2007). Die Messung von Werten mit dem ‘Portraits Value Questionnaire’. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38 (4), 261–275. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1024/0044-3514.38.4.261]
51.
SchneiderS. K., & JacobyW. G. (2005). Elite Discourse and American Public Opinion: The Case of Welfare Spending. Political Research Quarterly, 58 (3), 367–379. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/106591290505800301]
52.
SchwartzS. H. (2009). Culture Matters: National Value Cultures, Sources and Consequences. In WyerR. S., ChiuC. and HongY. (Eds). Understanding Culture: Theory, Research and Application. Psychology Press.
53.
SchwartzS. H., & BoehnkeK. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38 (3), 230–255. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00069-2] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00069-2]
54.
SchwartzS. H., MelechG., LehmannA., BurgessS. M., HarrisM., & OwensV. (2001). Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32 (5), 519–542. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0022022101032005001] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0022022101032005001]
55.
SchwartzS. H., & SagieG. (2000). Value Consensus and Importance: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31 (4), 465–497. [doi:10.1177/0022022100031004003] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0022022100031004003]
56.
SchwartzS. H., & SagivL. (1995). Identifying Culture-Specifics in the Content and Structure of Values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26 (1), 92. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0022022195261007] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0022022195261007]
57.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human-Values. Journal of Social Issues, 50 (4), 19–45. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x]
58.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25 (1), 65. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6]
59.
SearsD. O., & FunkC. L. (1991). The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24 (1), 1–91. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0065260108603275] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60327-5]
60.
SearsD., & FunkC. (1990). The limited effect of economic self-interest on the political attitudes of the mass public. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19 (3), 247–271. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/0090-5720(90)90030-B]
61.
SearsD. O., LauR. R., TylerT. R., & AllenH. M.Jr (1980). Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting. The American Political Science Review, 670–684. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/1958149] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/1958149]
62.
SijtsmaK. (2009). On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha. Psychometrika, 74 (1), 107–120. [doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0]
63.
SteenkampJ. E. M., & BaumgartnerH. (1998). Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross?National Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (1), 78–107. [doi:10.1086/209528] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1086/209528]
64.
SteigerJ. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate behavioral research, 25 (2), 173–180. Available from: http://www.statpower.net/SteigerBiblio/Steiger90b.pdf [Accessed 12 October 2013] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4]
65.
SvallforsS. (2007). The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.11126/stanford/9780804754354.001.0001]
66.
SvallforsS. (2005). Class and Conformism: A Comparison of four Western Countries. European Societies, 7 (2), 255–286. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/14616690500083493] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/14616690500083493]
67.
SvallforsS. (1997). Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations. European Sociological Review, 13 (3), 283–304. [doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219]
68.
TetlockP. E. (1986). A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 (4), 819–827. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819]
69.
UllrichC. G. (2002). Reciprocity, justice and statutory health insurance in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 12 (2), 123–136. [doi:10.1177/0952872002012002111] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0952872002012002111]
70.
VandenbergR. J., & LanceC. E. (2000). A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3 (1), 4–70. [doi:10.1177/109442810031002] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/109442810031002]
71.
VerplankenB., & HollandR. W. (2002). Motivated Decision Making: Effects of Activation and Self-Centrality of Values on Choices and Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (3), 434–447. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.434] [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.434]
72.
ZallerJ. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/CBO9780511818691]
