This article has two goals. Firstly, it shows how a relatively novel technique (Agent Based Modelling, hereafter ABM) can integrate different data types that are often used only in separate strands of research (interviews, experiments and surveys). It does this by comparing a well-known ABM of attitude dynamics with an alternative model using data from surveys and experiments. Secondly, the article explains ABM methodology and why it is important to the distinctiveness of ABM as a research method. In particular, the ramifications of differing approaches to ABM calibration and validation are discussed using the two different ABM as examples. The article concludes by showing how ABM might provide a progressive research strategy for integrating different data types and thus different disciplines in attitude research.
BertauxD. and ThompsonP. (Eds.) (1997) Pathways to Social Class: A Qualitative Approach to Social Mobility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2.
Chattoe-BrownE. (2010) ‘Is Simulation Forgetting Its History? Two Case Studies’, Draft Paper, Department of Sociology, University of Leicester, <https://leicester.academia.edu/EdmundChattoeBrown>.
ColemanJ. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
5.
DeffuantG., AmblardF., WeisbuchG. and FaureT. (2002) ‘How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 5, No. 4, <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/1.html>.
6.
DeffuantG. (2006) ‘Comparing extremism propagation patterns in continuous opinion models’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 9, No. 3, <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/3/8.html>.
7.
EganP. and MullinM. (2012) Turning personal experience into political attitudes: The effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming’, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 74, No. 3, p. 796–809. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/S0022381612000448]
8.
EpsteinJ. (2007) Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
EvansG. and DurantJ. (1995) ‘The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain’, Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 57–74. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004]
10.
FleishmanJ. (1986) ‘Types of political attitude structure: Results of a cluster analysis’, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3, p. 371–386. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1086/268990]
11.
GoldsmithD. (1997) Einstein's greatest blunder? The cosmological constant and other fudge factors in the physics of the universe. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
HatnaE. and BenensonI. (2012) ‘The Schelling model of ethnic residential dynamics: Beyond the integrated-segregated dichotomy of patterns’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 15, No. 1, <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/15/1/6.html>.
13.
HovlandC., HarveyO. and SherifM. (1957) ‘Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 55, No. 2, p. 244–252. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1037/h0048480]
14.
HuckfeldtR., JohnsonP. and SpragueJ. (2004) Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/CBO9780511617102]
15.
JacobmeierD. (2006) ‘Focusing of opinions in the Deffuant Model: First Impression Counts’, International Journal of Modern Physics C: Computational Physics and Physical Computation, Vol. 17, No. 12, p. 1801–1808.
16.
MalarzK., GronekP. and Ku?akowskiK. (2011) ‘Zaller-Deffuant model of mass opinion’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 14, No. 1, <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/14/1/2.html>.
17.
MossS. (2008) ‘Alternative approaches to the empirical validation of agent-based models’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 11, No. 1, <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/1/5.html>.
18.
MullainathanS. and WashingtonE. (2009) ‘Sticking with your vote: Cognitive dissonance and political attitudes’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 86–111.
19.
O'lesskerK. (1968) ‘Who voted for Hitler? A new look at the class basis of Naziism [sic]’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 74, No. 1, p. 63–69. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1086/224585]
20.
MckeownG. and SheehyN. (2006) ‘Mass media and polarisation processes in the bounded confidence model of opinion dynamics’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 9, No. 1, <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/1/11.html>.
21.
SchellingT. (1971) ‘Dynamic models of segregation’, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 143–186. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794]
22.
SirajA. (2009) ‘The construction of the homosexual ‘other’ by British Muslim heterosexuals’, Contemporary Islam, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 41–57. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s11562-008-0076-5]
23.
SkienaS. (2001) Calculated Bets: Computers, Gambling, and Mathematical Modeling to Win!New York, NY: Cambridge University Press/Mathematical Association of America. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/CBO9780511547089]
24.
StaufferD., SousaA. and SchulzeC. (2004) ‘Discretized opinion dynamics of the Deffuant model on scale-free networks’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 7, No. 3, <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/3/7.html>.
25.
St. GeorgeA. and Robinson-WeberS. (1983) ‘The mass media, political attitudes, and behavior’, Communication Research, Vol. 10, No. 4, p. 487–508. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/009365083010004004]
26.
TashakkoriA. and TeddlieC. (Eds.) (2010) Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
WindrumP., FagioloG. and MonetaA. (2007) ‘Empirical Validation of agent-based models: Alternatives and prospects’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 10, No. 2, <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/2/8.html>.
