Attitudes to the Welfare State: A Systematic Review Approach to the Example of Ethnically Diverse Welfare States

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in and expansion of research on welfare attitudes and the legitimacy of welfare states as they face both internal and external pressures at social, political and economic levels. The number of cross-national surveys is steadily increasing and many studies examine developments in social provision and public attitudes towards welfare. However, there is a lack of a clear and comprehensive overview of knowledge about tendencies in support for the welfare state in light of these pressures. Moreover, there is a lack of understanding of what impacts variations in attitudes and the relationship between attitudes and other constructs such as perceptions, values and stereotypes, which all form part of support for the welfare state. The article reports on findings from a project using tools from the systematic review tradition in an innovative way to achieve a comprehensive and systematic overview of current knowledge. The article has three main contributions; firstly, it adds to our understanding of the relationship between attitudes, perceptions, beliefs, stereotypes and values, secondly, it adds to attitude theory and thus enhances our understanding of welfare attitudes and lastly it illustrates how it achieves the first two through applying adapted tools from the systematic review tradition. Systematic Review as a method originated in natural science and medicine, and the paper examines how it can be successfully transferred to issues in social science. The article argues in favour of emphasising the importance of differentiating and investigating what is known and not known by examining the relationship between immigration and support for the welfare state. Thus, an adapted systematic review is found to enhance our understanding of trends in welfare support by use of theoretically framed research synthesis.

Keywords

Attitudes Values Perceptions Stereotypes Welfare State Immigration Ethnic Heterogeneity Support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alesina

and Glaeser

(2003). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aloe

(2009). A Partial Effect Size for the Synthesis of Multiple Regression Models. PhD Dissertation, Florida State University.

Bradshaw

J. R.

, Baldwin

(2000), Methodologies for socially useful systematic reviews in social policy, York: University of York.

Crepaz

(2006). Chapter 3 ‘If you are my brother, I may give you a dime!’ Public opinion on multiculturalism, trust, and the welfare state. In: Will

Kymlicka

, Keith

Banting

Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crepaz

(2008). Trust beyond borders: immigration, the welfare state, and identity in modern societies. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.

Crutchfield

and Pettinicchio

(2009). ‘Cultures of inequality’: ethnicity, immigration, social welfare, and imprisonment. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 623, No. 1, p. 134–147.

Dancygier

and Saunders

(2006). A new electorate? Comparing preferences and partisanship between immigrants and natives. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 50, No. 4, p. 962–981.

Davidov

, Meuleman

, and Billiet

(2008). Values and Support for Immigration: A Cross-Coutnry Comparison. European Sociological Review, Vol. 24, No. 5, p. 583–599.

Finseraas

, (2008). Immigration and preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis of European survey data. Comparative European politics, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 407–431.

10.

Gilens

(2000) Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media and the Politics of Anti-poverty Policy. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

11.

Gomersall

and Grayson

(2003) A difficult business: Finding the evidence for social science reviews. Working Paper 19, London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice.

12.

Goul Andersen

(2004) Immigration and the Legitimacy of the Scandinavian Welfare State. Keynote paper form 13^th Nordic Migration Conference, Aalborg/AMID 18-20 November 2004.

13.

Goul Andersen

(2006) Immigration and the Legitimacy of the Scandinavian Welfare State: Some Preliminary Danish Findings. AMID Working Paper Series 53/2006

14.

Haller

(2002), Theory and Method in the Comparative Study of Values: Critique and Alternative to Inglehart, European Sociological Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, p. 139–158. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/esr/18.2.139]

15.

Koning

(2011). The Real and Perceived Economics of Immigration. Paper presented at 2011 Canadian Political Science Association conference. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

16.

Larsen

C. A.

(2006). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: how welfare regimes influence public support. Aldershot: Ashgate.

17.

Larsen

C. A.

(2008). The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes. Comparative Political Studies. Vol. 41, No. 2, p. 145–168. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0010414006295234]

18.

Larsen

C. A.

(2011). Ethnic Heterogeneity and Public Support for Welfare: Is the American Experience Replicated in Britain, Sweden and Denmark? Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 34, No. 4, p. 332–353. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2011.00276.x]

19.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

(2003). Effect Sizes in Qualitative Research: A Prolegomenon. Quality & Quantity, Vol. 37, p. 393–409. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1023/A:1027379223537]

20.

Oskamp

(1991) Attitudes and Opinions 2^nd edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

21.

Mau

and Burkhardt

(2009). Migration and welfare state solidarity in western Europe. Journal of European social policy. Vol. 19, No. 3, p. 213–229. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0958928709104737]

22.

Molden

D. C.

and Dweck

C. S.

(2006). Finding ‘Meaning’ in Psychology. American Psychologist, Vol. 61, No. 3, p. 192–203. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192]

23.

Pawson

(2006). Digging for Nuggets: How Bad Research Can Yield Good Evidence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 127–142. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13645570600595314]

24.

Pettersen

P. A.

(1995). Chapter 8. The Welfare State: The Security Dimension. In: Borre

and Scarbrough

The Scope of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

25.

Senik

; Stichnoth

and Straeten

(2009). Immigration and natives’ attitudes towards the welfare state: evidence from the European social survey. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 91, No. 3, p. 345–370. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s11205-008-9342-4]

26.

Svallfors

(2006). The Moral Economy of Class: Class And Attitudes in Comparative Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

27.

Taylor-Gooby

(2005) Is the Future American? Can left politics preserve European welfare states from erosion through growing ‘racial’ diversity? Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 34, No. 4, p. 661–672. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/S0047279405009207]

28.

Van Oorschot

(2006). Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy. Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 23–42. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0958928706059829]

29.

Van Oorschot

(2008). Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. International journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 3–14. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00487.x]

30.

Van Oorschot

and Uunk

(2007a) Welfare spending and the public's concern for immigrants-Multilevel evidence for eighteen European countries. Comparative politics Vol. 40, No. 1, p. 63. [doi://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.5129/001041507X12911361134433]

31.

Van Oorschot

and Uunk

(2007b) Multi-level determinants of the Public's Informal Solidarity towards Immigrants in European Welfare States [Internet site] Available: http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=94175 Accessed 18 April 2011.