Inside the Research-Assemblage: New Materialism and the Micropolitics of Social Inquiry

Abstract

This paper explores social inquiry in terms of the ‘research-assemblages’ that produce knowledge from events. We use the precepts of new materialism (and specifically DeleuzoGuattarian assemblage ontology) to develop understanding of what happens when social events are researched. From this perspective, research is not at root an enterprise undertaken by human actors, but a machine-like assemblage of things, people, ideas, social collectivities and institutions. During social inquiry, the affect economies of an event-assemblage and a research-assemblage hybridise, generating a third assemblage with its own affective flow. This model of the research-assemblage reveals a micropolitics of social research that suggests a means to interrogate and effectively reverse-engineer different social research methodologies and methods, to analyse what they do, how they work and their micropolitical effects. It also suggests a means to forward-engineer research methods and designs to manipulate the kinds of knowledge produced when events are researched.

Keywords

Research Methodology New Materialism Ontology Assemblage Affect Deleuze and Guattari

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alldred

and Fox

(2015) ‘From “Lesbian and Gay Psychology” to a Critical Psychology of Sexualities’, in Parker

(ed.) Handbook of Critical Psychology. London: Routledge.

Alvesson

and Skoldberg

(2009) Reflexive Methodology (2^nd edition). London: Sage.

Anderson

(2010) ‘Becoming and being hopeful: towards a theory of affect’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 24, No. 5, p. 733–752.

Ansell Pearson

(1999) Germinal Life. London: Routledge.

Barad

(1996) ‘Meeting the universe halfway: realism and social constructivism without contradiction’, in Nelson

L.H.

and Nelson

(eds.) Feminism, Science and the Philosophy of Science, p. 161–194. Dordrecht; Kluwer.

Barad

(2003) ‘Performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter’, Signs, Vol. 28, No. 3, p. 801–831.

Best

(1995) ‘Sexualizing space’, in Grosz

and Probyn

(eds.), Sexy Bodies, p. 181–194. London: Routledge.

Braidotti

(2000) ‘Teratologies’, in Buchanan

and Colebrook

(eds.) Deleuze and Feminist Theory, p. 156–172. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Braidotti

(2006) Transpositions. Cambridge: Polity.

10.

Braidotti

(2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.

11.

Cheah

(2010) ‘Non-dialectical materialism’, in Coole

D.H.

and Frost

(eds.) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, p. 70–91. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

12.

Clough

P.T.

(2004) ‘Future matters: technoscience, global politics, and cultural criticism’, Social Text, Vol. 22, No. 3, p. 1–23.

13.

Clough

P.T.

(2008) ‘The affective turn: political economy, biomedia and bodies’, Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 25, No. 1, p. 1–22.

14.

Coleman

and Ringrose

(2013) ‘Introduction’, in Coleman

and Ringrose

(eds.) Deleuze and Research Methodologies, p. 1–22. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

15.

Connolly

W.E.

(2011) ‘The complexity of intention’, Critical Inquiry, Vol. 37, No. 4, p. 791–98.

16.

Coole

D.H.

and Frost

(2010) ‘Introducing the new materialisms’, in Coole

D.H.

and Frost

(eds.) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. p. 1–45.

17.

Coyne

I.T.

(1997) ‘Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: merging or clear boundaries?’ Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 26, No. 3, p. 623–630.

18.

Danermark

, Ekstrom

, Jaokobsen

and Karlsson

(2002) Explaining Society. Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.

19.

Delanda

(2006) A New Philosophy of Society. London: Continuum.

20.

Deleuze

(1988) Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights.

21.

Deleuze

and Guattari

(1984) Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Athlone.

22.

Deleuze

and Guattari

(1988) A Thousand Plateaus, London: Athlone.

23.

Foucault

(1981) The History of Sexuality Vol.1: The Will to Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Pelican.

24.

Fox

N.J.

(2003) ‘Practice-based evidence: towards collaborative and transgressive research’, Sociology, Vol. 37, p. 81–102.

25.

Fox

N.J.

and Alldred

(2013) ‘The sexuality-assemblage: desire, affect, anti-humanism’, Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, p. 769–789.

26.

Fox

N.J.

and Alldred

(2014) ‘New materialist social inquiry: designs, methods and the research-assemblage’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, doi: 10.1080/13645579.2014.921458

27.

Game

(1991) Undoing the Social. Buckingham: Open University Press.

28.

Gillies

and Alldred

(2012) ‘The ethics of intention: research as a political tool’, in Miller

, Birch

, Mauthner

and Jessop

(eds.) Ethics in Qualitative Research, p. 43–60. London: Sage.

29.

Grosz

(1994) Volatile Bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

30.

Haraway

(1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.

31.

Haraway

(1997) Modest Witness@Second_Millennium. London: Routledge.

32.

Harman

(2013) ‘Conclusions: assembly theory and its future’, in Acuto

and Curtis

(eds.) Reassembling International Theory, p. 118–130. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

33.

Jackson

A.Y.

and Mazzei

L.A.

(2013) ‘Plugging one text into another: thinking with theory in qualitative research’, Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 19, No. 4, p. 261–271.

34.

Kitzinger

(1987) The Social Construction of Lesbianism. London: Sage.

35.

Latour

(2005) Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

36.

Lau

and Morgan

(2014) ‘Integrating discourse, construction and objectivity: a contemporary realist approach, Sociology, Vol. 48, No. 3, p. 573–589.

37.

Law

(1992) ‘Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy and heterogeneity’, Systems Practice, Vol. 5, No. 4, p. 379–93.

38.

Massumi

(1988) ‘Translator's foreword and notes’, in Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. A Thousand Plateaus, p. ix-xix. London: Athlone.

39.

Massumi

(1996) ‘The autonomy of affect’, in Patton

(ed.) Deleuze: a Critical Reader, p. 217–239. Oxford: Blackwell.

40.

Morgan

D.L.

(2007) ‘Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 48–76.

41.

Potts

(2004) ‘Deleuze on Viagra (or, what can a Viagra-body do?)’, Body & Society, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 17–36.

42.

Renold

and Ringrose

(2011) ‘Schizoid subjectivities? Re-theorizing teen girls? sexual cultures in an era of “sexualization” ’, Journal of Sociology, Vol. 47, No. 4, p. 389–409.

43.

Ringrose

and Renold

(2014) ‘ “F**k rape!”: Exploring affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage’, Qualitative Inquiry, Vol 20, No. 6, p. 772–780.

44.

Rose

(1998) Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

45.

Shalin

D.N.

(1990) ‘The impact of transcendental idealism on early German and American sociology’, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 1–29.

46.

Stanley

and Wise

(1993) Breaking Out Again (2^nd Edition). London: Routledge.

47.

Taguchi

H.L.

and Palmer

(2013) ‘A more ‘livable’ school? A diffractive analysis of the performative enactments of girls’ ill-/well-being with(in) school environments’, Gender and Education, Vol. 25, No. 6, p. 671–687.

48.

Taylor

C.A.

and Ivinson

(2013) ‘Material feminisms: new directions for education’, Gender and Education, Vol. 25, No. 6, p. 665–670.

49.

Thibodeaux

(2014) ‘Three versions of constructionism and their reliance on social conditions in social problems research’, Sociology, Vol. 48, No. 4, p. 829–837.

50.

Thrift

(2004) ‘Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect’, Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography, Vol. 86, No. 1, p. 57–78.

51.

Van Der Tuin

and Dolphijn

(2010) ‘The transversality of new materialism’, Women: A Cultural Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 153–171.

52.

Youdell

and Armstrong

(2011) ‘A politics beyond subjects: the affective choreographies and smooth spaces of schooling’, Emotion, Space and Society, Vol. 4, No. 3, p. 144–150.