This article will explore the gentrification of Soho, reflecting on ethnographic research undertaken in the area over the past fifteen months, to argue that the recent social, political, and economic changes in Soho must be understood in relation to private, marketized and globalized neoliberal capitalist forces. We argue that the changes to the area result in a heavily-weighted form of gentrification that works to actively and knowingly sanitize the city, removing ‘undesirable’ people and venues from the area. As such, we propose to define this process as ‘hegemonic gentrification’, and distinguish this from other forms of gentrification in order to understand the different processes that underpin these specific changes, and more broadly, it allows us to problematize these changes as regards to the ‘right to the city’, and to expand current understandings in a way that allows for a more nuanced analysis of urban gentrification and its impacts within neolibreral capitalism.
AnguelovskiI. (2015) ‘Alternative Food Provision Conflicts in Cities: contesting food privilege, injustice, and whiteness in Jamaica Plain, Boston’Geoforum, 58: p. 184–194. [doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.014]
2.
ButlerT. and LeesL. (2006) ‘Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London: globalization and gentrifying global elites at the neighbourhood level’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(4): p. 467–487. [doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00220.x]
3.
ButlerT. & RobsonG. (2001) ‘Social Capital, Gentrification and Neighbourhood Change in London: a comparison of three South London Neighbourhoods’, Urban Studies, 38(12): p. 2145–2162. [doi:10.1080/00420980120087090]
4.
DavisJ. & ThornleyA. (2010), ‘Urban Regeneration for the London 2012 Olympics: issues of land acquisition and Legacy’, City, Culture and Society, (1): p. 89–98.
FloridaR. (2003) Cities and the Creative Class, City and Community, 2(1): p. 3–19 [doi:10.1111/1540-6040.00034]
9.
HubbardP.2004. ‘Cleansing the metropolis: sex work and the politics of zero tolerance’, Urban Studies, 41(9): p. 1687–1702. [doi:10.1080/0042098042000243101]
10.
HubbardP., MatthewsR., and ScoularJ.2009. ‘Legal Geographies - Controlling Sexually Oriented Businesses: Law, Licensing and the Geographies of a Controversal Land Use’. Urban Geography, 30(2): p. 185–205. [doi:10.2747/0272-3638.30.2.185]
11.
JacksonE. & ButlerT. (2015) “Revisiting ‘Social Tectonics’: the middle-classes and social mix in gentrifying neighbourhoods,Urban Studies, 52(13): p. 2349–2365 [doi:10.1177/0042098014547370]
KennellyJ. & WattP. (2012) ‘Seeing through the eyes of marginally housed youth: changing places and the gentrification of East London’Visual Studies, 27(2): p. 151–160. [doi:10.1080/1472586X.2012.677496]
14.
LeesL. (2012). ‘The geography of gentrification: Thinking through comparative urbanism’, Progress in Human Geography, 36(2): p. 155–171. [doi:10.1177/0309132511412998]
15.
LeesL.SlaterT. and WylyE. (2010) The Gentrification Reader, London: Routledge
16.
LeesL.SlaterT. and WylyE. (2008) Gentrification, London: Routledge
17.
LeyD. (2003) ‘Artists, Aestheticisation and the Field of Gentrification’, Urban Studies, 40(12): p. 2527–2544. [doi:10.1080/0042098032000136192]
18.
MasseyD. (2005) For Space.London: Sage Publication
19.
MarcuseP. (2012) “Whose Right(s) to What City?” in BrennerN., MarcuseP. and MayerM. (eds), Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, London: Routledge, p. 24–62
20.
MatthewsV. (2010) ‘Aestheticizing Space: Art, Gentrification and the City’Compass Geography, 4(6): p. 660–675. [doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00331.x]
21.
RacoM. & TunneyE. (2010) ‘Visibilities and Invisibilities in Urban Development: Small Business Communities and the London Olympics 2012’, Urban Studies, 47(10): p. 2069–2091. [doi:10.1177/0042098009357351]
SchmidC. (2012) “Henri Lefebvre, The Right to the City, and the New Metropolitan Mainstream”, in BrennerN., MarcuseP. and MayerM. (eds), Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, London: Routledge, p. 42–62
26.
WalkowitzJ. (2012) Nights Out - Life in CosmopolitanLondon. Yale University Press.
27.
WattP. (2013) ‘ “It's not for us” Regeneration, the 2012 Olympics and the Gentrification of East London’, City, 17(1): p. 99–118. [doi:10.1080/13604813.2012.754190]
