The potential of the Internet as a valuable methodological tool for social
science research is increasingly being recognised. This paper contributes to the
debate surrounding virtual synchronous interviews and the value of online
research. Specifically it introduces the use of a software conferencing
technique - Hotline Connect - and discusses the implications of using the
technique for Internet- based research. In particular issues of interview
design, developing rapport, the role of insiders and outsiders in the research
process, language use and the virtual interface are considered. The paper draws
on the experience of a recent research project entitled ‘Cyberparents’ and
concludes that the use of conferencing software holds great potential for
synchronous online interviewing. However, this must be combined with sensitive,
ethical handling of both the research process and the data to overcome both the
weaknesses of this particular method and those inherent in any interviewing
situation.
BAYMN.
(1998) The Emergence of Online
Community, Chapter 2 in
JONESS.G.
(Ed) Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and
Community.Thousand Oakes:
Sage.
2.
BENNETTC.M.
(1998) Men Online: Discussing Lived Experiences on the
Internet. Unpublished thesis, James Cook
University, North Queensland, Australia. Available at:
<http://www.hotkey.net.au/∼carolineb>
3.
BERGENR.K.
(1993) Interviewing survivors of marital rape:
Doing feminist research on sensitive topics. In
RENZETTIC,
and LEER. (eds)
Researching Sensitive Topics.London:
Sage.
4.
BURGESSR.
(1984) In the Field. An Introduction to Field
Research.London: Allen and
Unwin.
CHRISTENSENN.B.
(1999) ‘Inuit in Cyberspace: Practising and
Constructing Computer-mediated Space’, paper prepared for the 3rd
Annual ARCUS Award for Arctic Research Excellence.
DILLONJ.
(2000) ‘Battered women to tell their stories via
email’.The Independent on Sunday, January 30 2000, p.
3.
10.
DYCKI.
(1993) ‘Ethnography: a feminist
method?’.The Canadian Geographer, 37(1)
52–57.
11.
ENGLANDK.
(1994) ‘Getting Personal: reflexivity,
positionality, and feminist research’.The Professional Geographer,
46(1),
80–89.
12.
FEATHERSTONEM.,
and BURROWSR.
(1995) Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of
Technological Embodiment.London:
Sage.
13.
FINCHJ.
(1993) ‘It's Great to have Someone to Talk to’:
Ethics and politics of Interviewing Women, Chapter 14 in
HAMMERSLEYM
(Ed.) Social Research. Philosophy, Politics and Practice.London:
Sage.
14.
FONTANAA.,
and FREYJ.H.
(1994) ‘Interviewing: The Art of Science’.
Chapter 22 in
DENZINN., and
LINCOLNY.
(eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research,
London:
Sage.
15.
GAISERT.
(1997) ‘Conducting Online Focus Groups: A
Methodological Discussion’.Social Science Computer Review, vol. 15, No.
2, pp. 135–44.
16.
GIBSON-GRAHAMJ.K
(1994) ‘Stuffed if I know’: reflections on
post-modern feminist social research.Gender, Place and Culture, 1(2)
pp. 205–224.
17.
GLESNEC.,
and PESHKINA.
(1992) Becoming Qualitative Researchers.New York:
Longman.
18.
GRAHAMS.,
and MARVINS.
(1996) Telecommunications and the City:
Electronic Spaces,Urban Places.London:
Routledge.
19.
HINEC.
(2000) Virtual Ethnography.London:
Sage.
20.
HODKINSONP.
(1999) The Goth Scene as Trans-local
Subculture. Unpublished PhD. Thesis. Centre for Urban and Regional
Studies, University of Birmingham,
UK.
21.
HUGHESJ.
(2000) Low-Investment Internet- Based Distance
Learning Solutions: Systems and Procedures,TechKnowLogia, July/August pp.
23–25 <http://www.TechKnowLogia.org>
22.
JONESS.G.
(1995) Cybersociety: Computer- Mediated Communication
and Community.London:
Sage.
23.
JONESS.G
(Ed) (1997) Virtual Culture: identity and communication in
cybersociety.London:
Sage.
24.
JONESS.G.
(Ed) (1998) Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated
Communication and Community.Thousand Oakes, CA:
Sage.
25.
KINGS.
(1994) ‘Analysis of Electronic Support Groups
for Recovering Addicts’Interpersonal Computing and Technology2 (July) pp.
47–56.
26.
KITCHINR.
(1998) ‘Towards geographies of
cyberspace’.Progress in Human Geography, 22,
3, pp. 385–406
27.
LAMPJ.M.,
and HOWARDP.A.
(1999) ‘Guiding Parent's Use of the Internet for
Newborn Education’.Maternal- Child Nursing Journal,
24(1) pp.
33–36.
28.
LEED.
(1997) Interviewing Men: Vulnerabilities and
Dilemmas,Women's Studies International Forum, vol. 20,
No. 4, pp.
553–564.
29.
LOADERB.
(Ed.) (1997) The Governance of Cyberspace.London:
Routledge.
30.
MADGEC.
(1994) The ethics of research in the ‘Third
World’. In
ROBSONE., and
WILLISK.
(eds.) DARG Monograph No. 8: Postgraduate Fieldwork in Developing Areas
(Developing Areas Research Group of the Institute of British
Geographers) pp.
91–102.
31.
MANNC., and
STEWARTF.
(1999) Internet Methodologies and Qualitative
Research, Unpublished conference paper, BSA, Glasgow, April
1999.
32.
MANNC., and
STEWARTF.
(2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative
Research, New Technologies and Social Research
Series. London: Sage
Publications.
33.
MCCRACKENG.
(1998) The Long Interview,Qualitative Research Methods, Volume 13.
Newbury Park: Sage
Publications.
34.
MCDOWELLL.
(1992) ‘Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and
research methods in human geography’.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,
16(4), pp.
400–419.
35.
MICHAELSONK.L.
(1996) ‘Information, Community, and
Access’.Social Science Computer Review, vol. 14, No.
1, Spring 1996, pp.
57–59.
36.
MILLERT.
(1998) Shifting Layers of Professional, Lay and
Personal Narratives: Longitudinal Childbirth Research. Chapter
4 in
RIBBENSJ.,
and EDWARDSR. (eds)
Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and
Private Lives, London:
Sage.
NGUYEND.T.,
and ALEXANDERJ.
(1996) The Coming of Cyberspacetime and the End
of Polity. Chapter 6 in
ShieldsR.
(Ed.) Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living
Bodies.London:
Sage.
44.
OAKLEYA.
(1981) ‘Interviewing Women: a contradiction in
terms’. Chapter 2 in
ROBERTSH.
(Ed) Doing Feminist Research.London:
Routledge.
45.
O'CONNORH.,
and MADGEC.
(forthcoming) Using the Internet as a Medium for Research,
Working Paper, Centre for Labour Market Studies, University of
Leicester.
46.
O'LEARR.M.
(1996) ‘Using electronic mail (e-mail) surveys
for geographic research: lessons from a survey of Russian
environmentalists’, Professional
Geographer, 48(2) pp.
209–217.
47.
PACCAGNELLAL.
(1997) ‘Getting the Seat of your Pants Dirty:
Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual
Communities’.Journal of Computer Mediated Communication3(1) June 1997 <http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html>
48.
POSTERM.
(1995) Postmodern Virtualities,
in FETHERSTONEM., and
BURROWSR.
(Eds.) Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological
Embodiment, London:
Sage.
49.
RHEINGOLDH.
(1994) The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a
Computerised World.London: Secker and
Warburg.
50.
RIBBENSJ.
(1989) Interviewing - An ‘Unnatural
Situation'?Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 12,
No. 6, pp.
579–592.
51.
RIESSMANC.K.
(1991) When Gender is Not Enough: Women
Interviewing Women. Chapter 11 in
LORBERJ., and
FARRELLS.A.
(eds) The Social Construction of Gender, Newbury
Park:
Sage.
52.
RIPPENH.E.
(1997) White paper: Criteria for assessing the quality
of health information on the Internet. Available at: <http://hitiweb.mitretek.org/docs/criteria.html>. Accessed
March 18 1998.
53.
ROBSONC.
(1993) Real World Research. A Resource for Social
Scientists and Practicioner-Researchers.Oxford:
Blackwell.
54.
RODWAYA.
(ed) (1997) Bounty Infant Health and Feeding Guide.
Diss, Norfolk:
Bounty Publications Ltd.
55.
SELWYNN, and
ROBSONK.
(1998) ‘Using email as a research
tool’.Social Research Update, Issue 21, University of Surrey.
Available at: <http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU21.html>
56.
SHARFB.
(1997) ‘Communicating Breast Cancer Online:
Support and Empowerment on the Internet’.Women and Health, vol. 26(1)
pp. 65–84.
57.
SILKER.,
BRUCEJ., and
MAFFULLIN.
(1998) ‘Accessing the Internet for patient
information about orthopedics’.Journal of the American Medical Association,
280, p. 1309.
SMITHS.
(1998) Uncovering Key Aspects of Experience: The
Use of In-depth Interviews in a Study of Women Returners to Education.
Chapter 4 in STINA
LYONE., and
BUSFIELDJ.
(eds) Methodological Imaginations.London: Macmillian
Press.
61.
SPENDERD.
(1995) Nattering on the Net.Women, Power and Cyberspace.Melbourne: Spinifex
Press.
WELLMANB,
and GULIAM.
(1999) Virtual Communities as Communities: Net
surfers don't ride alone. Chapter 7 in
SMITHM.A.,
and KOLLOCKP. (Eds.)
Communities in Cyberspace,
London:
Routledge.
64.
WILLIAMSC.
(1999) ‘Question: Who killed off Dr. Spock?
Answer: The Net.’Guardian, 13 January 1999 pp.
8–9.
