The debate about the selection and proper use of theory, and their impact on
validity, is actually an example of sleight of hand. It is a paradigm conflict
posing as a debate about substantive issues. Within the diversionary debate,
qualitative (inductive) research has been critiqued and declared a-theoretical.
This paper engages with this claim and the assertions about the superiority of
quantitative (deductive) research and concludes that both positions are
redundant. At the outset, all research is deductive and once the data commences
to be interpreted and conclusions manufactured, it proceeds as a process driven
by a deductive- inductive dialectic. This dialectical manufacturing process is
universal and inescapable. At best, a systematic approach to data collection and
interpretation only allows for the subsequent partial deconstruction of the
research construct. That construct may be valid within the confines of its own
manufacturing process, but this does not open the way for claims of the
imprimatur of any broader validity.
BECKERP.H.
(1993) ‘Pearls, Pith, and Provocation: Common
Pitfalls in Published Grounded Theory Research’,Qualitative Health Research, vol. 3, No.
2, pp.
254–260.
2.
BLAIKIEN.
(1993) Approaches to Social Enquiry.Cambridge: Polity
Press.
3.
BRYMANA.
(1993) Quantity and Quality in Social
Research.London:
Routledge.
4.
BRYMANA.
(1995) Research Methods and Organization
Studies.London:
Routledge.
5.
BURGELMANR.A.
(1985) ‘Managing the New Venture Division:
Research Findings and Implications for Strategic
Management’, in
BrymanA.
(1995), Research Methods and Organization Studies.London:
Routledge.
6.
CHARMAZK.
(1988) ‘The Grounded Theory Method: An
Explication and Interpretation’, edited by
EmersonR.M.,
Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings.Illinois: Waveland Press,
Inc,19–35.
7.
CORBINJ.,
and STRAUSSA.
(1990) ‘Grounded Theory Research: Procedures,
Canons, and Evaluative Criteria’, in N.R. Pandit (1996), ‘The Creation of
Theory: A Recent Application of the Grounded Theory Method’,The Qualitative Report, vol. 2, No.
4, <http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-4/pandit.html>
8.
CRONBACHL.J.
(1982) Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social
Programs.San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
9.
DENZINN.K.
(1988) in M. LONKILA (1995), ‘Grounded Theory as
an Emerging Paradigm for Computer-assisted Qualitative Data
Analysis’, edited by
KelleU.,
Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory Methods and
Practices.London: Sage
Publications,
41–51.
10.
DENZINN.K.
(1994) ‘The Art and Politics of
Interpretation’, in
DenzinN.K.,
LincolnY.S.
(editors) Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks:
Sage,
500–515.
11.
DEYI.
(1996) Qualitative Data Analysis: A User- Friendly
Guide for Social Scientists.London:
Routledge.
12.
FIELDINGN.G.
(1988) ‘Actions and Structure’,
in SilvermanD.
(1994), Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text
and Interaction.London: Sage
Publications.
13.
GLASERB.G.
(1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory.Chicago:
Aldine.
14.
GLASERB.G.,
and STRAUSSA.L.
(1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for
Qualitative Research.Chicago:
Aldine.
15.
HAMMERSLEYM.
(1990) The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert
Blumer and The Chicago Tradition.London:
Routledge.
16.
HENWOODK.,
and PIDGEONN.
(1994) ‘Beyond the Qualitative Paradigm: A
Framework for Introducing Diversity within Qualitative Psychology’,
Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, Vol. 4,
pp. 225-238. KELLE, U. (1997) ‘Theory Building in Qualitative Research and
Computers Programs for the Management of Textual Data’,Sociological Research Online, vol. 2, No.
2, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/1.html>
17.
KUHNT.
(1970) The Structure of Scientific
Revolutions.Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
18.
KVALES.
(1996) Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative
Research Interviewing.Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications.
19.
MERTONR.K.
(1957) ‘Social Theory and Social Structure, 2nd
Edition’, in U. Kelle (1997) ‘Theory Building in Qualitative Research and
Computers Programs for the Management of Textual Data’,Sociological Research Online, vol. 2, No.
2, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/1.html
20.
NEUMANW.
Lawrence (1997) Social Research
Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Third Edition.Boston: Allyn and
Bacon.
21.
NIPPERT-ENGC.
(1996) Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries through
Everyday Life.London: The University of Chicago
Press.
22.
PANDITN.R.
(1996) ‘The Creation of Theory: A Recent
Application of the Grounded Theory Method’,The Qualitative Report, vol. 2, No.
4, <http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-4/pandit.html>
23.
PATTONM.Q.
(1997) Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century
Text, Edition 3. Thousand Oaks:
Sage.
24.
RUBINH.J.,
and RUBINI.S.
(1995) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing
Data.Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications.
25.
RUBINSTEINR.,
LaughlinC.,
and McMannisJ.
(1984) Science as Cognitive Process: Towards an
Empirical Philosophy of Science.Philadelphia, Penn.: University
of Pennsylvania Press.
26.
SILVERMAND.
(1994) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for
Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction.London: Sage
Publications.
27.
STERNP.N.
(1980) ‘Grounded Theory Methodology: Its Uses
and Processes’, in
StreubertH.J.,
CarpenterD.R.
(editors) (1995) Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the
Humanistic Imperative.Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott
Company.
28.
STERNP.N.
(1994) ‘Eroding Grounded
Theory’,MorseJ.M. (editor)
Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods.Thousand Oaks CA:
Sage, pp.
212–223.
29.
STRAUSSA.M.
(1987a) Qualitative Analysis for Social
Scientists.Melbourne: Cambridge University
Press.
30.
STRAUSSA.M.
(1987b) ‘Qualitative Analysis for Social
Scientists’, in
HammersleyM.
(1990), The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and The
Chicago Tradition.London:
Routledge.
31.
STRAUSSA.M.,
and CORBINJ.
(1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory
Procedures and Techniques.London: Sage.
(1994) ‘Grounded Theory Methodology’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (editors)
Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.
273–285.
32.
STREUBERTH.J.,
and CarpenterD.R.
(1995) Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the
Humanistic Imperative.Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott
Company.
33.
TAYLORS.J.,
and BOGDANR.
(1984) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods:
The Search for Meanings.Brisbane: John Wiley and
Sons.
34.
TURNERB.A.
(1981) ‘Some Practical Aspects of Qualitative
Data Analysis: One Way of Organising the Cognitive Processes Associated with
the Generation of Grounded theory’, in
BrymanA.
(1993), Quantity and Quality in Social Research.London:
Routledge.
35.
WALLACEW.L.
(1971) The Logic of Science in Sociology.Chicago, Illinois:
Aldine-Atherton.
36.
WINTERG.
(2000) ‘A Comparative Discussion of the Notion
of ‘Validity’ in Qualitative and Quantitative Research’,The Qualitative Report, vol. 4, Nos. 3
& 4, <http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/winter.html>
37.
YINR.K.
(1989) Case Study Research: Design and Analysis
(Revised Edition).London: Sage
Publications.
