Modernization,Rationalization,and Education: Responding to the Other

Abstract

As societies forfeit increasingly their homogeneous character and cross-cultural encounters are being multiplied, demands for multicultural and Other- oriented education appear legitimate and convincing. However, to endorse such demands does not suffice on its own, if it is not accompanied by appropriate theoretical shifts in sociological core assumptions. In this article, I propose that one such shift should concern the old coupling of modernization with societal rationalization. By discussing Habermas's conception of rationalization, I defend the rejection of the identification of modernization with rational development. I show the benefits of this rejection for multicultural education by highlighting what ethnocentric vices (Martha Nussbaum's term) it staves off. I conclude with some suggestions for a sociology of education that is sensitive to otherness.

Keywords

Descriptive And Normative Vice Education Habermas Modernization Multiculturalism Nussbaum Rationalization Reason Weber

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

APEL

K.O.

(1984). Understanding and Explanation. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.

APEL

K.O.

(1993). ‘Challenge.of a Totalizing Critique of Reason and the Program of a Philosophical Theory of Rationality Types’, in Freundlieb

Dieter

, & Hudson

Wayne

, eds., Reason and Its Other: Rationality in Moderm German Philosophy and Culture. Providence & Oxford, Berg.

GROSZ

Elizabeth

(1993). ‘Bodies and Knowledges: Feminism and the Crisis of Reason’ in Alcoff

, Potter

, eds., Feminist Epistemologies. N. York, Routledge.

HABERMAS

(1984). Communication and the Evolution of Society. Cambridge, Polity Press.

HABERMAS

(1987). Toward A Rational Society. Cambridge, Polity Press.

HABERMAS

(1987b). Knowledge and Human Interests. Cambridge, Polity Press.

HABERMAS

(1988) Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge, Polity Press.

HABERMAS

(1991). The Theory of Communicative Action vol. 1. Cambridge, Polity Press.

HABERMAS

(1992). Postmetaphysical Thinking. Cambridge, Polity Press.

10.

HABERMAS

(1992b). Autonomy and Solidarity. London & N. York, Verso.

11.

HONNETH

Axel

(1991). The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in Critical Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.

12.

KONDYLIS

Panayotis

(1987). Europaikos Diafotismos vol.1 & 2. Athens, Themelion. [in German: Die Aufklärung im Rahmen des Neuzeitlichen Rationalismus (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta Verlag, 1981)]

13.

LUHMANN

(1993) ‘Social Theory Without “Reason”: Luhmann and the Challenge of Systems Theory’, in Freundlieb

Dieter

, & Hudson

Wayne

, eds., Reason and Its Other: Rationality in Moderm German Philosophy and Culture. Providence & Oxford, Berg.

14.

NUSSBAUM

Martha

(1997). Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.

15.

PAPASTEPHANOU

Marianna

(1997). ‘Communicative Action and Philosophical Foundations’ Philosophy & Social Criticism 23, 4, 41–69.

16.

PAPASTEPHANOU

(2000). ‘Ulysses's Reason, Nobody's Fault: reason, subjectivity and the dialectic of enlightenment’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 26, 6, 47–61.

17.

WELLMER

(1992). The Persistence of Modernity: Essays on Aesthetics, Ethics, and Postmodernism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.