We reviewed performed a retrospective review of our series of excision arthroplasty patients and identified 16 patients who had undergone the procedure for sepsis, and who we had subsequently subjected to revision to a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Mean follow-up was 96±15 months. There was a significant reduction in limb length discrepancy and a marked improvement in walking capability. Range of movement improved most in patients under 65 years of age. Patient selection is critical, because THA after excision arthroplasty is complex, and may have less satisfactory results primary surgery.
BourneR.B., HunterG.A., RorabeckC.H., MacnabJ.J.. A six year follow up of infected total hip replacements managed by Girdlestone's arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Br1984; 66: 340–3.
3.
CastellanosJ., FloresX., LlusàM., ChiribogaC., NavarroA.. The Girdlestone pseudarthrosis in the treatment of infected hip replacements.Int Orthop1998; 22: 178–81.
4.
GrauerJ.D., AmstutzH.C., O'CarrollP.F., DoreyF.G.. Resection arthroplasty of the hip.J Bone Joint Surg Am1989; 71: 669–78.
5.
de LaatE.A., van der ListJ.J., van HornJ.R., SlooffT.J.. Girdlestone's pseudarthrosis after removal of a total hip prosthesis; a retrospective study of 40 patients.Acta Orthop Belg1331; 57: 109–13.
6.
RenvallS., EinolaS.. Gilgerstone operation. An acceptable alternative in the case of unreconstructable hip arthroplasty.Ann Chir Gynaecol1990; 79: 165–7.
7.
ScalviA., CampacciA., MarcerM., CassiniM.. Girdlestone arthroplasty for loosening of the total hip prosthesis: evaluation and results.Chir Organi Mov1995; 80: 279–85.
8.
SchröderJ., SarisD., BesselaarP.P., MartiR.K.. Comparison of the results of the Girdlestone pseudarthrosis with reimplantation of a total hip replacement.Int Orthop1998; 22: 215–8.
9.
EmaraK.M.. Pelvic support osteotomy in the treatment of patients with excision arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res2008; 466: 708–13.
10.
SharmaH., De LeeuwJ., RowleyD.I.. Girdlestone resection arthroplasty following failed surgical procedures.Int Orthop2005; 29: 92–5.
11.
SharmaH., KakarR.. Outcome of Girdlestone's resection arthroplasty following complications of proximal femoral fractures.Acta Orthop Belg2006; 72: 555–9.
12.
BermanA.T., MazurT.. Conversion of resection arthroplasty to total hip replacement.Orthopedics1994; 17: 1155–8.
13.
FitzgeraldR.H.. Infected total hip arthroplasty: diagnosis and treatment.J Am Acad Orthop Surg1995; 3: 249–62.
14.
PaproskyW.G., PeronaP.G., LawrenceJ.M.. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: A 6-year follow-up evaluation.J Arthroplasty1994; 9: 33–44.
15.
Merle D'AubignéR.. Numerical classification of the function of the hip 1970.Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot1990; 76: 371–4.
16.
GruenT.A., McNeiceG.M., AmstutzH.C.. “Modes of failures” of cemented stem type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.Clin Orthop Relat Res1979; 141: 17–27.
17.
MorscherE., HerzogR., BapstR.. Hip revision surgery in septic loosening.Chir Organi Mov1994; 79: 335–40.
18.
BöhmP., BischelO.. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years.J Bone Joint Surg Am2001; 83: 1023–31.
19.
RittmeisterM.E., MantheiL., HailerN.P.. Prosthetic replacement in secondary Girdlestone arthroplasty has an unpredictable outcome.Int Orthop2005; 29: 145–8.
