The effect of leg length differences on early clinical outcome after total hip arthroplasty remains uncertain.
We performed a prospective study on 94 patients who were evaluated preoperatively and one year after surgery for clinical leg length differences, which were then compared with radiological measurements. The effect of leg length differences on walking ability, limp, pain and patient satisfaction was studied.
The mean clinical leg length difference after operation was 0.05 cm (–1.5 to 1.5, SD 0.5). Clinical and radiological measurements correlated poorly (ω=0.36 pre- and ω=0.186 postoperatively). Patients with a shorter operated leg on clinical assessment were more prone to limping (p<0.05), and patients with a longer leg had more pain compared to patients with equal leg lengths (p<0.05). Walking ability, Harris Hip Score and patient satisfaction were only marginally affected by leg length differences.
Virtually equal leg length was achieved for most patients but small differences had a negative influence in relation to limping and pain. Patients should be counselled pre-operatively about possible leg length differences and associated symptoms.
BoseW.. Accurate limb-length equalization during total hip arthroplasty.Orthopedics2000; 23: 433–6.
2.
EdeenJ., SharkeyP., AlexanderA.. Clinical significance of leg-length inequality after total hip arthroplasty.Am J Orthop1995; 24: 347–51.
3.
RanawatC., RodriguezJ.. Functional leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty1997; 12: 359–64.
4.
WhiteT., DougallT.. Arthroplasty of the hip. Leg length is not important.J Bone Joint Surg Br2002; 84: 335–8.
5.
WyldeV., WhitehouseS., TaylorA., PattisonG., BannisterG., BlomA.. Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement.Int Orthop2009; 33: 905–9.
6.
ClarkC., HuddlestonH., SchochE., ThomasB.. Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.J Am Acad Orthop Surg2006; 14: 38–45.
7.
FribergO.. Clinical symptoms and biomechanics of lumbar spine and hip joint in leg length inequality.Spine1983; 8: 643–51.
8.
GilesL., TaylorJ.. Low-back pain associated with leg length inequality.Spine1981; 6: 510–21.
9.
HofmannA., SkrzynskiM.. Leg-length inequality and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty: A lawyer awaits!Orthopedics2000; 23: 943–4.
10.
KonyvesA., BannisterG.C.. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Br2005; 87: 155–7.
11.
AspegrenD., CoxJ., TrierK.. Short leg correction: A clinical trial of radiographic vs. Non-radiographic procedures.JManipulative Physiol Ther1987; 10: 232–8.
12.
BoewerM., ArndtH., OstermannP., PeterseinJ., MutzeS.. Length and angle measurements of the lower extremity in digital composite overview images.Eur J Radiol2005; 15: 158–64.
13.
SabharwalS., ZhaoC., McKeonJ.J., McClemensE., EdgarM., BehrensF.. Computed radiographic measurement of limb-length discrepancy. Full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph compared with scanogram.J Bone Joint Surg Am2006; 88: 2243–51.
14.
LeitzesA.H., PotterH.G., AmaralT., MarxR.G., LymanS., WidmannR.F.. Reliability and accuracy of mri scanogram in the evaluation of limb length discrepancy.J Pediatr Orthop2005; 25: 747–9.
15.
BradyR., DeanJ., SkinnerT., GrossM.. Limb length inequality: Clinical implications for assessment and intervention.JOrthop Sports Phys Ther2003; 33 (5): 221–234.
16.
KrettekC., KochT., HenzlerD., BlauthM., HoffmannR.. [A new procedure for determining leg length and leg length inequality using ultrasound. II: Comparison of ultrasound, teleradiography and 2 clinical procedures in 50 patients].Unfallchirurg1996; 99: 43–51.
17.
WoermanA.L., Binder-MacleodS.A.. Leg length discrepancy assessment: Accuracy and precision in five clinical methods of evaluation.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1984; 5: 230–9.
18.
GlassR.B., PoznanskiA.K.. Leg-length determination with biplanar ct scanograms.Radiology1985; 156: 833–4.
19.
SarinV., PrattW., BradleyG.. Accurate femur repositioning is critical during intraoperative total hip arthroplasty length and offset assessment.J Arthroplasty2005; 20: 887–91.
20.
WoolsonS.T., HartfordJ.M., SawyerA.. Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement.J Arthroplasty1999; 14: 159–64.
21.
EggliS., PisanM., MullerM.. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty.JBone Joint Surg Br1998; 80: 382–90.
22.
OchsnerP.E., Schweizer. A Surgical technique. In: OchsnerP.E. ed. Total hip replacement.Berlin: Springer2003; 15–58.
23.
MalchauH., KärrholmJ., WangY.X., HerbertsP.. Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients.Acta Orthop Scand1995; 66: 418–24.
24.
WhiteA.B.. AAOS Commitee on professional liability: Study of 119 closed malpractise claims involving hip replacement.AAOS Bulletin July 1994.
25.
UnnanuntanaA., WagnerD., GoodmanS.. The accuracy of preoperative templating in cementless total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty2009; 24: 180–6.
26.
SuhK., CheonS., KimD.. Comparison of preoperative templating with postoperative assessment in cementless total hip arthroplasty.Acta Orthop Scand2004; 75: 40–4.
27.
BhaveA., MarkerD., SeylerT., UlrichS., PlateJ., MontM.. Functional problems and treatment solutions after total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty2007; 22: 116–24.
28.
Sayed-NoorA.S., HugoA., SjödénG.O., WretenbergP.. Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty: Comparison of two methods of measurement.Int Orthop2009; 33: 1189–93.
29.
HarrisI., HatfieldA., WaltonJ.. Assessing leg length discrepancy after femoral fracture: Clinical examination or computed tomography?ANZ J Surg2005; 75: 319–21.
30.
FieldR., CroninM., SinghP.. The oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Br2005; 87: 618–22.
31.
ManzottiA., CerveriP., MomiE., PullenC., ConfalonieriN.. Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand.Int Orthop Epub Nov 2009.
32.
BombelliR.. Osteoarthritis of the hip: pathogenesis and consequent therapy.Springer, 1976.
33.
MorscherE.. Etiology and pathophysioloy of leg length discrepancies.Progress in Orthopaedic Surgery1977; 1: 9–19.
34.
SubotnickS.. The short leg syndrome.J Am Podiatry Assoc1976; 66: 720–3.
35.
RöslerJ., PerkaC.. The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement.Int Orthop2000; 24: 23–7.
36.
McGroryB., MorreyB., CahalanT., AnK., CabanelaM.. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Br1995; 77: 865–9.
37.
GoreD.R., MurrayM.P., GardnerG.M., SepicS.B.. Roentgenographic measurements after müller total hip replacement. Correlations among roentgenographic measurements and hip strength and mobility.J Bone Joint Surg Am1977; 59: 948–53.
38.
Sayed-NoorA.S., SjodenG.O.. Greater trochanteric pain after total hip arthroplasty: The incidence, clinical outcome and associated factors.Hip Int2006; 16: 202–6.
39.
MancusoC.A., JoutJ., SalvatiE.A., SculcoT.P.. Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am2009; 91: 2073–8.
40.
LiebermanJ.R., DoreyF., ShekelleP.. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am1996; 78: 835–8.
41.
McGeeM., HowieD., RyanP., MossJ., HolubowyczO.. Comparison of patient and doctor responses to a total hip arthroplasty clinical evaluation questionnaire.J Bone Joint Surg Am2002; 84: 1745–52.
