The effective results shown in the porous systems of tantalum employed for the use of osseointegrates has been demonstrated by means of animal experimentation. However, there is a total lack of any research studies on the osseointegration of tantalum implants from retrieval of the same after a period of time whereby the material had been implanted within the human body.
Materials and Methods
For this study, five rod implants used for the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head were retrieved following collapse of the femoral head and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The time of implantation ranged between six weeks and twenty months.
Results
Observation during this study has confirmed the effectiveness of osseointegration within this period of time. New bone was observed around and within the porous system of the on rod devices at retrieval date. The bone ingrowth, however, proved to be slower and less intense than that resulting within animal species during the first few months after implantation.
Conclusions
Nevertheless, the results obtained in the quantitative assessment of this process proved to be similar to those results achieved by other authors in previous experimental work studies.
PudenzRH.The repair of cranial defects with tantalum: An experimental study.JAMA1943; 121: 478–81.
2.
RobertsonRCL, PeacherWG.The use of tantalum foil in the repair of peripheral nerves.Surg Clin North Am1943; 23: 1491–504.
3.
VenableC, StuckW.A general consideration of metals for buried appliances in surgery.Inter Abst Surg1943; 76: 297–304.
4.
EcholsDH, ColcloughJA.Cranioplasty with tantalum plate.Report of eight cases. Surgery1945; 17: 304–14.
5.
GoldbergSJ, PorperRP, ChyzusP, FriedmanJM.A fractured mandible, from initial operation to removal of tantalum mesh.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1976; 41: 32–8.
6.
HeinrichB, PruinE-H, EschbergerJ, KellnerG, PlenkHJr.Histological observations of the implant site after endosseal implantation of tantalum in odontostomatological locations.Osterr Z Stomatol1978; 75: 214–24.
7.
GrundschoberF, KellnerG, EschbergerJ, PlenkHJr.Long term osseous anchorage of endosseous dental implants made of tantalum and titanium. In: WinterGD, GibbonsDF, PlenkII Jr, eds. Biomaterials 1980.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons,1982: 365–70.
8.
AlberiusP.Bone reactions to tantalum markers.A scanning electron microscopic study. Acta Anat (Basel)1983; 115: 310–8.
9.
JohanssonCB, HanssonHA, AlbrektssonT.Qualitative interfacial study between bone and tantalum, niobium or commercially pure titanium.Biomaterials1990; 11: 277–80.
10.
BlackJ.Biological performance of tantalum.Clin Mater1994; 16: 167–73.
11.
KatoH, NakamuraT, NishiguchiS, Bonding of alkali-and heat-treated tantalum implants to bone.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2000; 53: 28–35.
12.
TümmierHP, ThullR.Model of the metal/tissue connection of implants made of titanium and tantalum. In: ChristelP, MeunierA, LeeAJC, eds. Biological and Biomechanical Performance of Biomaterials.Amsterdam: Elsevier1986: 403–8.
13.
PflügerG, PlenkHJr, BöhlerN, GrundschoberF, SchiderS.Bone reaction to porous and grooved stainless steel, tantalum and niobium implants. In: WinterGD, GibbonsDF, PLenkII Jr, eds. Biomaterials 1980.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons,1982: 45–9.
14.
PflügerG, PlenkHJr, BöhlerN, GrunschoberF, SchiderS.Experimental studies on total knee and hip joint endoprostheses made of tantalum. In: WinterGD, GibbonsDF, PlenkHJr, eds. Biomaterials 1980.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons,1982: 161–7.
15.
PlenkHJr, PflügerG, SchiderS, BohletN, GrundschoberF.Experiences with tantalum for heavy load-bearing implants.In: Proceedings of the World Congress of Med Phys Biomed Engin,Hamburg, Germany,1982: 3–12.
16.
PlenkHJr, PflügerG, SchiderS, BöhlerN, GrundschoberF.The current status of uncemented tantalum and niobium femoral endoprostheses. In: MorsherE, ed. The Cementless Fixation of Hip Endoprostheses.Berlin: Springer-Verlag,1984: 174–7.
17.
AronsonAS, JonssonN, AlberiusP.Tantalum markers in radiography.An assessment of tissue reactions. Skeletal Radiol1985; 14: 207–11.
18.
ZardiackasLD, ParsellDE, DillonLD, MitchellDW, NunneryLA, PoggieR.Structure, metallurgy, and mechanical properties of a porous tantalum foam.J Biomed Mater Res2001; 58: 180–7.
19.
BobynJD, PoggieRA, KrygierJJ, Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction.J Bone Joint Surg Am2004; 86: 123–9.
20.
LevineBR, SporerS, PoggieRA, Della ValleCJ, JacobsJJ.Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery.Biomaterials2006; 27: 4671–81.
21.
WigfieldC, RobertsonJ, GillS, NelsonR.Clinical experience with porous tantalum cervical interbody implants in a prospective randomized controlled trial.Br J Neurosurg2003; 17: 418–25.
22.
SchoettleT, StandardS, LanfordG, AbramS, RobertsonD, RobieB.Successful use of a modern porous tantalum (Trabecular Metal TM) device for cervical interbody fusion: results from a prospective, randomized Multi-Center Clinical Study.In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of CSRS, San Diego, CA, 2005: poster 11.
23.
BobynJD, StackpoolGJ, HackingSA, TanzerM, KrygierJJ.Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial.J Bone Joint Surg Br1999; 81: 907–14.
24.
BobynJD, TohKK, HackingSA, TanzerM, KrygierJJ.Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model.J Arthroplasty1999; 14: 347–54.
25.
TurnerTM, UrbanRM, BerzinsA, SumnerDR.Evaluation of tantalum foam, a novel porous material, for bone ingrowth fixation using a canine model.In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, San Francisco, CA,1995: 125.
26.
ClaassenB, KernsL, GharpurayV, BlackJ, PowersDL.High specific volume bone growth into a porous tantalum structure.In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, New Orleans, LA,1997: 481.
27.
SmithG, GannonF, PuertoD, CohenR.Bone in-growth and remodelling associated with a porous tantalum canine segmental hip implant.In: Transactions of the 46th Annual Meeting of Orthopaedic Research Society, Orlando, FL,2000: 504.
28.
MatsunoH, YokoyamaA, WatariF, MotohiroU, KawasakiT.Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of refractory metal implants, titanium, hafnium, niobium, tantalum and rhenium.Biomaterials2001; 22: 1253–62.
29.
ZouX, LiH, BungerM, EgundN, LindM, BungerC.Bone ingrowth characteristics of porous tantalum and carbon fiber interbody devices: an experimental study in pigs.Spine J2004; 4: 99–105.
30.
RahbekO, KoldS, ZipporB, OvergaardS, SoballeK.Particle migration and gap healing around trabecular metal implants.Int Orthop2005: 1–7.
31.
AdamsJE, ZobitzME, ReachJSJr, AnKN, LewallenDG, SteinmannSP.Canine carpal joint fusion: a model for four-corner arthrodesis using a porous tantalum implant.J Hand Surg Am2005; 30: 1128–35.
32.
BungerMH, FossM, ErlacherK, Bone nanostructure near titanium and porous tantalum implants studied by scanning small angle x-ray scatterin.Eur Cell Mater2006; 12: 81–91.
33.
GruenTA, PoggieRA, LewallenDG, Radiographic evaluation of a monoblock acetabular component: a multicenter study with 2- to 5-year results.J Arthroplasty2005; 20: 369–78.
34.
MacherasGA, PapagelopoulosPJ, KaterosK, KostakosAT, BaltasD, KarachaliosTS.Radiological evaluation of the metal-bone interface of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component.J Bone Joint Surg Br2006; 88: 304–9.
35.
MalkaniAL, CrawfordC, BakerD.Acetabular component revision using a trabecular metal implant.In: Proceedings of the 72nd AAOS Annual Meeting, Washington, DC,2005: 359.
36.
MardonesRM, TalacR, HanssenAD, LewallenDG.Use of a porous tantalum revision shell in revision total hip arthroplasty.In: Proceedings of the 72nd AAOS Annual Meeting, Washington, DC,2005: 360.
37.
RongaM, ManelliA, MonteleoneG, CherubinoP.Bone ingrowth in high porous tantalum biomaterial: a morphological study in a case series of human avascular necrosis of femoral head.J Bone Joint Surg Br2006;88 Supp III: 422.
38.
AldegheriR, TaglialavoroG, BerizziA.The tantalum implant screw for treating femoral head necrosis: rationale and results.Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr2007; 2: 63–8.
39.
LiuG, WangJ, YangS, XuW, YeS, XiaT.Effect of a porous tantalum rod on early and intermediate stages of necrosis of the femoral head.Biomed Mater2010; 5: 065003.
40.
NadeauM, SéguinC, TheodoropoulosJS, HarveyEJ.Short term clinical outcome of a porous tantalum implant for the treatment of advanced osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Mcgill J Med2007; 10: 4–10.
41.
ShulerMS, RooksMD, RobersonJR.Porous tantalum implant in early osteonecrosis of the hip: Preliminary report on operative, survival, and outcomes results.J Arthroplasty2007; 22: 26–31.
42.
TanzerM, BobynJD, KrygierJJ, KarabaszD.Histopatological retrieval analysis of clinically failed porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants.J Bone Joint Surg Am2008; 90: 1282–9.
43.
TsaoAK, RobersonJR, ChristieMJ, Biomechanical and clinical evaluations of a porous tantalum implant for the treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis.J Bone Joint Surg Am2005; 87: 22–7.
44.
VaritimidisSE, DimitrouliasAP, KarachaliosTS, DailianaZH, MalizosKN.Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis.Acta Orthop2009; 80: 20–5.
45.
VeilletteChJH, MehdianH, SchemitschEH, McKeeMD.Survivorship analysis and radiographic outcome following tantalum rod insertion for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.J Bone Joint Surg Am2006; 88: 48–55.
46.
SteinbergME, HaykenGD, SteinbergDR.Classification and staging of osteonecrosis. In: UrbaniakJR, JonesJPJr, eds. Osteonecrosis: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons;1997: 277–84.
47.
HarrisWH.Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty.An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am1969; 51: 737–55.
48.
DeglurkarM, DavyDT, StewartM, GoldbergVM, WelterJF.Evaluation of machining methods for trabecular metal implants in a rabbit intramedullary osseintegration model.J Biomed Mat Res B Appl Biomater2007; 80: 528–40.
49.
SumnerDR, BryanJM, UrbanRM, KuszakJR.Measuring the volume fraction of bone ingrowth: A comparison of three techniques.J Orthop Res1990; 8: 448–52.
50.
JastyM, BragdonCR, HaireTJr, HarrisWH.Comparison of bone ingrowth into cobalt chrome and titanium fibre mesh porous coated cementless canine acetabular components.J Biomed Mater Res1993; 27: 639–44.
51.
JastyM, HarrisWH.Observations on factors controlling bony ingrowth into weight bearing, porous, canine total hip replacements. In: FitzgeraldR, ed. Non-cemented total hip arthroplasty.New York, Raven Press, 1988: 175.
52.
CookSD, BarrackRL, ThomasKA, HaddadRJJr.Quantitative analysis of tissue growth into human porous total hip components.J Arthroplasty1988; 3: 249–62.
53.
CollierJP, BauerTW, BloebaumRD, Results of implant retrieval from post-mortem specimens in patients with well-functioning long-term total hip replacement.Clin Orthop1992; 274: 97–112.
54.
PidhorzLE, UrbanRM, JacobsJJ, SumnerDR, GalanteJO.A quantitative study of bone and soft tissues in cementless porous-coated acetabular components retrieved at autopsy.J Arthroplasty1993; 8: 213–25.
55.
SumnerDR, JastyM, JacobsJJ, Histology of porous-coated acetabular components: 25 cementless cups retrieved after arthroplasty.Acta Orthop Scand1993; 64: 619–26.
56.
EnghCA, Zettl-SchafferKF, KukitaY, SweetD, JastyM, BragdonC.Histological and radiographic assessment of well functioning porous-coated acetabular components: A human post-mortem retrieval study.J Bone Joint Surg Am1993; 75: 814–24.
57.
ShimkoDA, ShimkoVF, SanderEA, DicksonKF, NaumanEA.Effect of porosity on the fluid flow characteristics and mechanical properties of tantalum scaffolds.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2005; 73: 315–24.
TsaoAK, RobersonJR, ChristieMJ, Biomechanical and clinical evaluations of a porous tantalum implant for the treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis.J Bone Joint Surg Am2005; 87: 22–7.
60.
VeilletteChJH, MehdianH, SchemitschEH, McKeeMD.Survivorship analysis and radiographic outcome following tantalum rod insertion for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.J Bone Joint Surg Am2006; 88: 48–55.
61.
FindlayDM, WelldonK, AtkinsGJ, The proliferation and phenotypic expression of humanosteoblasts on tantalum metal.Biomaterials2004; 25: 2215–27.
62.
SevillaP, AparicioC, PlanellJA, GilFJ.Comparison of the mechanical properties between tantalum and nickel-titanium foams implant materials for bone ingrowth applications.J Alloys Compd2007; 439: 67–73.
63.
ArciniegasM, AparicioC, ManeroJM, GilFJ.Low elastic modulus metals for joint prosthesis: Tantalum and nickel-titanium foams.J Eur Ceram Soc2007; 27: 3391–8.
64.
ChanSP, TohK-K, BobynJD, HackingSA, TanzerM, KrygierJJ.The osseous response to a new porous tantalum biomaterial.In: Proceedings of the SIROT Congress, Sydney, Australia, 1999.
65.
HeinerAD, BrownTD, PoggieRA.Structural efficacy of a novel porous tantalum implant for osteonecrosis grafting.In: Transactions of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA,2001; 26: 480.
66.
BragdonCR, DohertyAM, ChiangPP, JastyM, HarrisWH, RubashHE.The effect of trabecular metal porous surface on gap healing and bone ingrowth fixation in a canine total hip model.In: Transactions of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA, 2004;29:257.
