To compare the outcomes of 3 upper arm access types: transposed brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (BBAVF), autogenous brachial vein–brachial artery access (ABBA), and a new type of ePTFE graft (Flixene™ graft) (AVG), in a consecutive series of patients treated in a tertiary centre.
Methods
A prospective, computerized access database was analysed retrospectively to identify all patients undergoing BBAVF, ABBA, or AVG between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009.
Results
A total of 108 patients were identified; of whom 45 had BBAVF, 15 ABBA, and 48 ePTFE brachioaxillary AVG. Early failure was similar in all 3 groups. The 18–month functional patency rates for the ABBAs, BBAVFs, and grafts were 27%, 51%, and 55%, respectively. The median time to first use for AVGs was significantly shorter (p<0.0001). Complications were not more frequent in AVGs than ABBAs and BBAVFs (p=0.127). The total number of access interventions was similar between the AVG and ABBA groups (p=0.58), but it was significantly higher in the AVG group compared with the BBAVF group (p<0.0001).
Conclusions
This study supports the current recommendations of the NKF Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative for using BBAVFs as third choice after radiocephalic and brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas. We also showed good results with a new type of prosthetic graft (Flixene™ graft) that allows cannulation within days of implantation. We now favour the use of this graft instead of basilic vein transposition in elderly patients with short life expectancy and urgent need of renal access.
Vascular Access 2006 Work Group.Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis2006; 48(Suppl 1): S176–247.
2.
FitzgeraldJ.T., SchanzerA., McVicarJ.P., ChinA.I., PerezR.V., TroppmannC.Upper arm arteriovenous fistula versus forearm looped arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis access: a comparative analysis. Ann Vasc Surg2005; 19: 843–50.
3.
PisoniR.L., YoungE.W., DykstraD.M.Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int2002; 61: 305–16.
4.
GreenbergJl, MayS., SulimanA., AngleN.The brachial artery-brachial vein fistula: expanding the possibilities for autogenous fistulae. J Vasc Surg2008; 48: 1245–50.
5.
DorobantuL.F., StiruO., lliescuV.A., NovelliE.The brachiobrachial arteriovenous fistula: a new method in patients without a superficial venous system in the upper limb. J Vasc Access2006; 7: 87–89.
6.
ElwakeelH.A., SaadE.M., ElkiranY.M., AwadI.Unusual vascular access for hemodialysis: transposed venae comitantes of the brachial artery. Ann Vasc Surg2007; 21: 560–3.
7.
SrinivasaiahN., YalamuriR.R., Umez-EroniniN.O., RixD., TalbotD.Venae comitantes fistulae: an option in patients with difficult hemodialysis access. J Vasc Access2007; 8: 258–61.
LioupisC., MistryH., ChandakP., TyrrellM., ValentiD.Autogenous brachial-brachial fistula for vein access: haemodynamic factors predicting outcome and 1 year clinical data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2009; 38: 770–6.
10.
SidawyA.N., GrayR., BesarabA.Recommended standards for reports dealing with arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses. J Vasc Surg2002; 35: 603–10.
11.
SidawyA.N., SpergelL.M., BesarabA.The Society for Vascular Surgery: clinical practice guidelines for the surgical placement and maintenance of arteriovenous hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg2008; 48: 2S–25S.
12.
OliverM.J., McCannR.L., IndridasonO.S., ButterlyD.W., SchwabS.J.Comparison of transposed brachiobasilic fistulas to upper arm grafts and brachiocephalic fistulas. Kidney Int2001; 60: 1532–9.
13.
LeeCH, KoP.J., LiuY.H., HsiehH.C., LiuH.P.Brachiobasilic fistula as a secondary access procedure: an alternative to a dialysis prosthetic graft. Chang Gung Med J2004; 27: 816–23.
14.
WealeA.R., BevisP., NearyW.D., LearP.A., MitchellD.C.A comparison between transposed brachiobasilic arterio-venous fistulas and prosthetic brachioaxillary access grafts for vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg2007; 46: 997–1004.
15.
KeuterX.H., De SmetA.A., KesselsA.G., van der SandeF.M., WeltenR.J., TordoirJ.H.A randomized multicenter study of the outcome of brachial-basilic arteriovenous fistula and prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop as vascular access for hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg2008; 47: 395–401.
16.
KakkosS.K., AndrzejewskiT., HaddadJ.A.Equivalent secondary patency rates of upper extremity Vectra Vascular Access Grafts and transposed brachial-basilic fistulas with aggressive access surveillance and endovascular treatment. J Vasc Surg2008; 47: 407–14.
17.
WooK., DorosG., NgT., FarberA.Comparison of the efficacy of upper arm transposed arteriovenous fistulae and upper arm prosthetic grafts. J Vasc Surg2009; 50: 1405–11.
18.
KiyamaH., ImazekiT., KuriharaS., YoneshimaH.Long-term follow-up of polyurethane vascular grafts for hemoaccess bridge fistulas. Ann Vasc Surg2003; 17: 516–21.
19.
TorinaP.J., WestheimerE.F., SchanzerH.R.Brachial vein transposition arteriovenous fistula: is it an acceptable option for chronic dialysis vascular access?J Vasc Access2008; 9: 39–44.
20.
PfledererT.A., KwokS., KetelB.L., PilgramT.A comparison of transposed brachiobasilic fistulae with nontransposed fistulae and grafts in the Fistula First era. Semin Dial2008; 21: 357–63.
21.
WooK., FarberA., DorosG., KilleenK., KohanzadehS.Evaluation of the efficacy of the transposed upper arm arteriovenous fistula: a single institutional review of 190 basilic and cephalic vein transposition procedures. J Vasc Surg2007; 46: 94–9 [discussion: 100].
22.
KaweckaA., Debska-SlizienA., PrajsJ.Remarks on surgical strategy in creating vascular access for hemodialysis: 18 years of one center's experience. Ann Vasc Surg2005; 19: 590–8.
23.
BenedettoB.J., MaddenR.L., KurbanovA., LipkowitzG.S.Transposed basilic vein fistula: a superior alternative to prosthetic grafts?Curr Surg2000; 57: 503–4.
24.
MatsuuraJ.H., RosenthalD., ClarkM.Transposed basilic vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene for brachial-axillary arteriovenous fistulas. Am J Surg1998; 176: 219–21.
25.
CoburnM.C., CarneyW.I.Jr.. Comparison of basilic vein and polytetrafluoroethylene for brachial arteriovenous fistula. J Vasc Surg1994; 20: 896–902 [discussion: 903-4].
26.
DixF.P., KhanY., Al-KhaffafH.The brachial artery-basilic vein arterio-venous fistula in vascular access for haemodialysis: a review paper. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006; 31: 70–9.
27.
SnyderD.C., ClericuzioC.P., StringerA., MayW.Comparison of outcomes of arteriovenous grafts and fistulas at a single Veterans' Affairs medical center. Am J Surg2008; 196: 641–6.
28.
GroteJ., LufftV., NikuttaP., van der LiethH., BahlmannJ., DanielW.G.Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of superior vena cava thrombosis in patients with long-term central venous hemodialysis catheters. Clin Nephrol1994; 42: 183–8.
29.
McDowellD.E., MossA.H., VasilakisC., BellR., PillaiL.Percutaneously placed dual-lumen silicone catheters for long-term hemodialysis. Am Surg1993; 59: 569–73.
30.
MossA.H., McLaughlinM.M., LempertK.D., HolleyJ.L.Use of a silicone catheter with a Dacron cuff for dialysis short-term vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis1988; 12: 492–8.
31.
DrydenM.S., SamsonA., LudlamH.A., WingA.J., PhillipsI.Infective complications associated with the use of the Quinton ‘Permcath’ for long-term central vascular access in haemodialysis. J Hosp Infect1991; 19: 257–62.
32.
AllariaP.M., LucatelloA., GandiniE., GiangrandeA.Relapsing seroma in a uremic patient bearing a PTFE graft as vascular access. J Vasc Access2001; 2: 28–31.
33.
EidA, LyassS.Acute perigraft seroma simulating anastomotic bleeding of a PTFE graft applied as an arteriovenous shunt for hemodialysis. Ann Vasc Surg1996; 10: 290–1.
34.
WolfordH.Y., HsuJ., RhodesJ.M.Outcome after autogenous brachial-basilic upper arm transpositions in the post-National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative era. J Vasc Surg2005; 42: 951–6.
35.
CulpK., TaylorL., HulmeP.A.Geriatric hemodialysis patients: a comparative study of vascular access. Anna J1996; 23: 583–590, 622 [discussion: 591-2].
