Endovascular Electrocardiography to Guide Placement of Totally Implantable Central Venous Catheters in Oncologic Patients

Abstract

Purpose

Appropriate tip position of totally implantable central venous catheters is essential in order to prevent catheter-related complications, in particular thrombosis. Endovascular electrocardiography is an economic and safe method to guide placement of catheters into the central veins. Although widely utilized, there is still lack of conclusive evidence about its efficacy. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular electrocardiographic guided placement compared to the anthropometric method.

Methods

Endovascular ECG was employed to guide electrocardiographic placement of a central venous catheter in a cohort of oncologic patients. The rate of correct placement and the incidence of catheter-related thrombosis were considered. Patients in which central venous catheters were inserted with the anthropometric technique were considered as control group.

Results

The rate of correct placement was 91% and 50% for ECG-guided and anthropometric catheters (p<0.0001) respectively. None of the patients suffered from early insertion-related complications. The rate of catheter-related vascular thrombosis was lower for ECG-guided catheters (3.6% vs. 9.6%, n.s.), in particular for left-inserted catheters (0% vs. 33.3%, p=0.02).

Conclusion

Endovascular electrocardiography was more effective than the anthropometric technique in placement of implantable central venous catheters and was associated with a lower incidence of catheter-related thrombosis, in particular for those inserted from the left-side.

Keywords

Electrocardiography Implantable catheters Vascular thrombosis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Horng

H.C.

, Yuan

C.C.

, Chao

K.C.

, Cheng

M.H.

, Wang

P.H.

A simple method to accurately position Port-A-Cath without the aid of intraoperative fluoroscopy or other localizing devices.

J Surg Oncol 2007; 95: 582–6.

Frank

J.L.

, Halla

, Garb

J.L.

, Reed

W.P.

Fluoroscopy-free placement of standard chest wall subcutaneous chronic venous access devices.

Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4: 597–602.

Stonelake

P.A.

, Bodenham

A.R.

The carina as a radiological landmark for central venous catheter tip position.

Br J Anaesth 2006; 96: 335–40.

Gebhard

R.E.

, Szmuk

, Pivalizza

E.G.

, Melnikov

, Vogt

, Warters

R.D.

The accuracy of electrocardiogram-controlled central line placement.

Anesth Analg. 2007; 104: 65–70.

McGee

D.C.

, Gould

M.K.

Preventing complications of central venous catheterization.

N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1123–33.

Teichgräber

U.K.

, Gebauer

, Benter

, Wagner

Long-term central venous lines and their complications.

Rofo 2004; 176: 944–52.

Lin

C.H.

, Wu

H.S.

, Chan

D.C.

, Hsieh

C.B.

, Huang

M.H.

, Yu

J.C.

The mechanisms of failure of totally implantable central venous access system: analysis of 73 cases with fracture of catheter.

Eur J Surg Oncol 2010; 36: 100–3.

Cunningham

R.S.

The role of low-molecular-weight heparins as supportive care therapy in cancer-associated thrombosis.

Semin Oncol. 2006; 33(Suppl 4): S17–25.

Mermel

L.A.

, Farr

B.M.

, Sherertz

R.J.

Infectious Diseases Society of America, American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society for Healthcare epidemiology of America. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections.

J Intraven Nurs 2001; 24: 180–205.

10.

SIAARTI Recommandations for basic anesthesia monitoring. Minerva Anestesiol. 1997; 63: 267–70.

11.

Feller-Kopman

Ultrasound-guided internal jugular access: a proposed standardized approach and implications for training and practice.

Chest 2007; 132: 302–9.

12.

Ryu

H.G.

, Bahk

J.H.

, Kim

J.T.

, Lee

J.H.

Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth.

Br J Anaesth. 2007; 98: 225–7.

13.

Damascelli

, Patelli

, Frigerio

L.F.

Placement of long-term central venous catheters in outpatients: study of 134 patients over 24,596 catheter days.

AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 1235–9.

14.

Yevzlin

A.S.

, Song

G.U.

, Sanchez

R.J.

, Becker

Y.T.

Fluoroscopically guided vs modified traditional placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters: clinical outcomes and cost analysis.

J Vasc Access 2007; 8: 245–51.

15.

Schummer

, Herrmann

, Schummer

Intra-atrial ECG is not a reliable method for positioning left internal jugular vein catheters.

Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 481–6.

16.

Watters

V.A.

, Grant

J.P.

Use of electrocardiogram to position right atrial catheters during surgery.

Ann Surg 1997; 225: 165–71.

17.

Francis

K.R.

, Picard

D.L.

, Fajardo

M.A.

, Pizzi

W.F.

Avoiding complications and decreasing costs of central venous catheter placement utilizing electrocardiographic guidance.

Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 175: 208–11.

18.

Breschan

, Platzer

, Likar

Central venous catheter for newborns, infants and children.

Anaesthesist 2009; 58: 897–900, 902–4.

19.

Maecken

, Grau

Ultrasound imaging in vascular access.

Crit Care Med 2007; 35(5 Suppl): S178–85.

20.

Mayo

P.H.

, Beaulieu

, Doelken

American College of Chest Physicians/la Société de Réanimation de Langue Française statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography.

Chest 2009; 135: 1050–60.

21.

Benzadón

M.N.

, Ortega

D.F.

, Thierer

J.M.

Comparison of the amplitude of the P-wave from intracardiac electrocardiogram obtained by means of a central venous catheter filled with saline solution to that obtained via esophageal electrocardiogram.

Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 978–81.

22.

Schummer

, Schummer

, Schelenz

Central venous catheters–the inability of ‘intra-atrial ECG’ to prove adequate positioning.

Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 193–8.

23.

Guillory

R.K.

, Gunter

O.L.

Ultrasound in the surgical intensive care unit.

Curr Opin Crit Care 2008; 14: 415–22.

24.

Tseng

, Sadler

, Wong

Radiologic placement of central venous catheters: rates of success and immediate complications in 3412 cases.

Can Assoc Radiol J 2001; 52: 379–84.

25.

Harter

, Salwender

H.J.

, Bach

, Egerer

, Goldschmidt

, Ho

A.D.

Catheter-related infection and thrombosis of the internal jugular vein in hematologic-oncologic patients undergoing chemotherapy: a prospective comparison of silver-coated and uncoated catheters.

Cancer 2002; 94: 245–51.

26.

Lokich

J.J.

, Becker

Subclavian vein thrombosis in patients treated with infusion chemotherapy for advanced malignancy.

Cancer 1983; 52: 1586–9.

27.

Anderson

A.J.

, Krasnow

S.H.

, Boyer

M.W.

Thrombosis: the major Hickman catheter complication in patients with solid tumor.

Chest 1989; 95: 71–5.

28.

Brismar

, Hardstedt

, Jacobson

Diagnosis of thrombosis by catheter phlebography after prolonged central venous catheterization.

Ann Surg 1981; 94: 779–83.

29.

McDonough

J.J.

, Altemeier

W.A.

Subclavian venous thrombosis secondary to indwelling catheters.

Surg Gynecol Obstet 1971; 133: 397–400.

30.

Lechner

, Weltermann

Pathophysiology of chemotherapy-associated thrombosis.

Hamostaseologie. 2009; 29: 112–20.

31.

Brusasco

, Corradi

, Zattoni

P.L.

, Launo

, Leykin

, Palermo

Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in bariatric patients.

Obes Surg 2009; 19: 1365–70.

32.

Kujur

, Rao

M.S.

, Mrinal

How correct is the correct length for central venous catheter insertion.

Indian J Crit Care Med 2009; 13: 159–62.

33.

Pittiruti

, Hamilton

, Biffi

, MacFie

, Pertkiewicz

; ESPEN. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 365–77.

34.

Biffi

, de Braud

, Orsi

Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.

Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 767–73.