A nonrandomized, retrospective, cohort, single-center study was designed to examine the visual and refractive outcome of epi–laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia (with and without astigmatism) in patients with thin corneas (less than 500 µm), and to compare these results with those of a group of patients with normal corneal thickness.
Methods.
Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), spherical and cylindrical residual refractive error, mean keratometry readings (Km), and pupil diameter were measured postoperatively at 24 hours, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months in a group of 28 eyes with thin corneas (group 1) and a second age- and gender-matched group of 28 eyes with normal corneal thickness (group 2). In addition, the efficacy index was calculated at every postoperative examination.
Results.
Postoperative central corneal thickness was 464.14±50.40 µm in group 1 and 421.89±26.63 µm in group 2 (p<0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in UCVA, efficacy index, and spherical and cylindrical residual error between both groups, with an evolution towards stability over time in all cases. Statistically significant between-group differences in Km at all follow-up examinations were explained by between-group differences in ablation depth and attempted spherical correction.
Conclusions.
A 12-month follow-up revealed epi-LASIK for myopia (with and without astigmatism) to be a safe and predictable surface ablation procedure, with good visual and refractive outcome in patients with thin corneas, as compared with a group of patients with normal corneal thickness.
SeilerT., KoufalaK., RichterG.. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis.J Refract Surg1998; 14: 312–7.
3.
AzarD.T., AngR.T., LeeJ.B.Laser subepithelial keratomileusis: electron microscopy and visual outcomes of flap photorefractive keratectomy.Curr Opin Ophthalmol2001; 12: 323–8.
4.
CamellinM.. Laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.J Refract Surg2003; 19: 666–70.
5.
PallikarisI.G., NaoumidiI.I., KalyvianakiM.I., KatsanevakiV.J.. Epi-LASIK: comparative histological evaluation of mechanical and alcohol-assisted epithelial separation.J Cataract Refract Surg2003; 29: 1496–501.
6.
PallikarisI.G., KalyvianakiM.I., KatsanevakiV.J., GinisH.S.. Epi-LASIK: preliminary clinical results of an alternative surface ablation procedure.J Cataract Refract Surg2005; 31: 879–85.
7.
MunnerlynC.R., KoonsS.J., MarshallJ.. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery.J Cataract Refract Surg1988; 14: 46–52.
8.
KimS-Y, SahW-J, LimY-W, HahnT-W. Twenty percent alcohol toxicity on rabbit corneal epithelial cells: electron microscopic study.Cornea2002; 21: 388–92.
9.
KalyvianakiM.I., KymionisG.D., KounisG.A., PanagopoulouS.I., GrentzelosM.A., PallikarisI.G.. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.Ophthalmology2008; 115: 2174–80.
10.
SharmaN., KaushalS., JhanjiV., TitiyalJ.S., VajpayeeR.B.. Comparative evaluation of 'flap on' and 'flap off' techniques of Epi-LASIK in low-to-moderate myopia.Eye2009; 23: 1786–9.
11.
KimS.T., KohJ.W., YoonG.J., YangS.W.. Clinical outcomes of epi-LASIK: 1-year results of on- and off-flap procedures with and without mitomycin-C.Br J Ophthalmol2010; 94: 592–6.
12.
WangQ.M., FuA.C., YuY.Clinical investigation of off-flap epi-LASIK for moderate to high myopia.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2008; 49: 2390–4.
13.
ChenW.L., ShenE.P., HsiehY.T., YehP.T., WangT.J., HuF.R.. Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopic findings between epi-LASIK procedures with different management of the epithelial flaps.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2011; 52: 3640–7.
14.
AngR.E.T., ReyesK.B., HernandezJ.A.P., TchahH.. Wavefront-guided epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis with mitomycin-C for myopia and myopic astigmatism: flap-on versus flap-off technique.J Cataract Refract Surg2011; 37: 1133–9.
15.
RandlemanJ.B.. Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions.Curr Opin Ophthalmol2006; 17: 406–12.
16.
TaneriS., ZieskeJ.D., AzarD.T.. Evolution, techniques, clinical outcomes, and pathophysiology of LASEK: review of the literature.Surv Ophthalmol2004; 49: 576–602.
17.
SalzJ.J., BinderP.S.. Is there a “magic number” to reduce the risk of ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy?Am J Ophthalmol2007; 144: 284–5.
HashemiH., FotouhiA., SadeghiN., PayvarS., FoudaziH.. Laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for myopia in patients with a thin cornea.J Refract Surg2004; 20: 90–1.
22.
VinciguerraP., MunozM.I., CamesascaF.I., GrizziF., RobertsC.. Long-term follow-up of ultrathin corneas after surface retreatment with phototherapeutic keratectomy.J Cataract Refract Surg2005; 31: 82–7.
23.
KymionisG.D., BouzoukisD., DiakonisV.Long-term results of thin corneas after refractive laser surgery.Am J Ophthalmol2007; 144: 181–5.
24.
de Benito-LlopisL., TeusM.A., Sánchez-PinaJ.M., FuentesI.. Stability of laser epithelial keratomileusis with and without mitomycin C performed to correct myopia in thin corneas: a 15-month follow-up.Am J Ophthalmol2008; 145: 807–12.
25.
de Benito-LlopisL., AlióJ.L., OrtizD., TeusM.A., ArtolaA.. Ten-year follow-up of excimer laser surface ablation for myopia in thin corneas.Am J Ophthalmol2009; 147: 768–73.
26.
BaileyI.L., BullimoreM.A., RaaschT.W., TaylorH.R.. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1991; 32: 422–32.
27.
PallikarisI.G., KatsanevakiV.J., KalyvianakiM.I., NaoumidiI.I.. Advances in subepithelial excimer refractive surgery techniques: epi-LASIK.Curr Opin Ophthalmol2003; 14: 207–12.
28.
AlióJ.L., RodríguezA.E., MéndezM.C., KanellopoulosJ.. Histopathology of epi-LASIK in eyes with virgin corneas and eyes with previously altered corneas.J Cataract Refract Surg2007; 33: 1871–6.
29.
SomaT., NishidaK., YamatoM.Histological evaluation of mechanical epithelial separation in epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis.J Cataract Refract Surg2009; 35: 1251–9.
TeusM.A., de Benito-LlopisL., García-GonzálezM.. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.Am J Ophthalmol2008; 146: 357–62.
32.
TorresL.F., SanchoC., TanB., PadillaK., SchanzlinD.J., ChayetA.S.. Early postoperative pain following Epi-LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, comparative, bilateral study.J Refract Surg2007; 23: 126–32.
33.
HondurA., BilgihanK., HasanreisogluB.. A prospective bilateral comparison of epi-LASIK and LASEK for myopia.J Refract Surg2008; 24: 928–34.
34.
O'DohertyM., KirwanC., O'KeeffeM., O'DohertyJ.. Postoperative pain following epi-LASIK, LASEK, and PRK for myopia.J Refract Surg2007; 23: 133–8.
35.
ReillyC.D., PandayV., LazosV., MittelstaedtB.R.. PRK vs LASEK vs Epi-LASIK: a comparison of corneal haze, postoperative pain and visual recovery in moderate to high myopia.Nepal J Ophthalmol2010; 2: 97–104.
36.
DaiJ., ChuR., ZhouX., ChenC., QuX., WangX.. One-year outcomes of epi-LASIK for myopia.J Refract Surg2006; 22: 589–95.
37.
KatsanevakiV.J., KalyvianakiM.I., KavroulakiD.S., PallikarisI.G.. One-year clinical results after epi-LASIK for myopia.Ophthalmology2007; 114: 1111–7.
38.
ChenS.H., FengY.F., StojanovicA., WangQ.M.. Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparing surface ablation for correction of myopia with and without 0.02% mitomycin C.J Refract Surg2011; 27: 530–41.
39.
TeusM.A., de Benito-LlopisL., AlióJ.L.. Mitomycin C in corneal refractive surgery.Surv Ophthalmol2009; 54: 487–502.
