Combined Use of a Femtosecond Laser and a Microkeratome in Obtaining Thin Grafts for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: An Eye Bank Study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2013
Combined Use of a Femtosecond Laser and a Microkeratome in Obtaining Thin Grafts for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: An Eye Bank Study
To evaluate the use of a femtosecond laser combined with a microkeratome in the preparation of posterior corneal disks for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
Methods
This experimental study involved ultrathin DSAEK tissue preparation of 22 donor corneas unsuitable for transplantation. The first cut was performed with an Intralase® FS60 laser and the second cut with a Moria CBm 300-μm microkeratome. The thickness of the first cut was modified for each cornea to obtain a final graft thickness of less than 110 μm. Precut and postcut central pachymetry were performed with an ultrasonic pachymeter. Central endothelial cell density (ECD) was calculated before and 24 hours after tissue preparation.
Results
Final graft thickness was 105.0 ± 26.1 (SD) μm (range 65–117). The mean microkeratome head cut thickness was 324.5 ± 10.9 μm (range 310–345). Precut and postcut ECDs averaged 2250 ± 222 and 2093 ± 286 cells/mm2, respectively, representing 6.9% of cell loss. No corneas were perforated.
Conclusions
Femtosecond FS60 lasers and Moria CBm 300-μm microkeratomes can be used sequentially to prepare consistently thin DSAEK grafts with no irregular cuts or cornea perforations.
LeeW.B., JacobsD.S., MuschD.C., KaufmanS.C., ReinhartW.J., ShteinR.M.Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology2009; 116: 1818–30.
2.
PriceM.O., PriceFWJr.Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology2006; 113: 1936–42.
MellesG.R.Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea2006; 25: 879–81.
5.
DapenaI., HamL., MellesG.R.Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK—the thinner the better?Curr Opin Ophthalmol2009; 20: 299–307.
6.
MearzaA.A., QureshiM.A., RostronC.K.Experience and 12-month results of Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with a small-incision technique. Cornea2007; 26: 279–83.
7.
ChenE.S., TerryM.A., ShamieN., HoarK.L., FriendD.J.Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: six-month results in a prospective study of 100 eyes. Cornea2008; 27: 514–20.
8.
HamL., DapenaI., van der WeesJ., MellesG.R.Secondary DMEK for poor visual outcome after DSEK: donor posterior stroma may limit visual acuity in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea2010; 29: 1278–83.
9.
PogorelovP., CursiefenC., BachmannB.O., KruseF.E.Changes in donor corneal lenticule thickness after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with organ-cultured corneas. Br J Ophthalmol2009; 93: 825–9.
10.
NeffK.D., BiberJ.M., HollandE.J.Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea2011; 30: 388–91.
11.
Van CleynenbreugelH., RemeijerL., HillenaarT.Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: effect of intraoperative lenticule thickness on visual outcome and endothelial cell density. Cornea2011; 30: 1195–200.
12.
SeeryL.S., NauC.B., McLarenJ.W., BaratzK.H., PatelS.V.Graft thickness, graft folds, and aberrations after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol2011; 152: 910–6.
13.
AhmedK.A., McLarenJ.W., BaratzK.H., MaguireL.J., KittlesonK.M., PatelS.V.Host and graft thickness after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol2010; 150: 490–7.
14.
ShintonA.J., TsatsosM., KonstantopoulosA.Impact of graft thickness on visual acuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol2012; 96: 246–9.
15.
VillarrubiaA., PalacínE., AránguezC., SolanaJ., García-AlonsoC.R.[Functional results after endothelial queratoplasty: three years of experience.]Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol2011; 86: 47–53.
16.
PriceF.W.Jr., PriceM.O.Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg2006; 32: 411–8.
17.
TerryM.A., OusleyP.J.Replacing the endothelium without corneal surface incisions or sutures: the first United States clinical series using the deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Ophthalmology2003; 110: 755–64.
18.
BusinM., PatelA.K., ScorciaV., PonzinD.Microkeratome-assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2012; 53: 521–4.
19.
HsuM., HerethW.L., MoshirfarM.Double-pass microkeratome technique for ultra-thin graft preparation in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Clin Ophthalmol2012; 6: 425–32.
20.
SikderS., NordgrenR.N., NeravetlaS.R., MoshirfarM.Ultra-thin donor tissue preparation for endothelial keratoplasty with a double-pass microkeratome. Am J Ophthalmol2011; 152: 202–8.
21.
HjortdalJ., NielsenE., VestergaardA., SøndergaardA.Inverse cutting of posterior lamellar corneal grafts by a femtosecond laser. Open Ophthalmol J2012; 6: 19–22.
22.
MoothaV.V., HeckE., VerityS.M.Comparative study of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation by Moria CBm microkeratome, horizon microkeratome, and Intralase FS60. Cornea2011; 30: 320–4.
23.
JonesY.J., GoinsK.M., SutphinJ.E., MullinsR., SkeieJ.M.Comparison of the femtosecond laser (IntraLase) versus manual microkeratome (Moria ALTK) in dissection of the donor in endothelial keratoplasty: initial study in eye bank eyes. Cornea2008; 27: 88–93.
24.
RosaA.M., Neto MurtaJ., QuadradoM.J.Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness. J Cataract Refract Surg2009; 35: 833–8.
25.
HamiltonD.R., JohnsonR.D., LeeN., BourlaN.Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg2008; 34: 2049–56.
26.
KelliherC., EnglerC., SpeckC., WardD., FarazdaghiS., JunA.S.A comprehensive analysis of eye bank-prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for use in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea2009; 28: 966–70.
27.
ChenE.S., TerryM.A., ShamieN., HoarK.L., FriendD.J.Precut tissue in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor characteristics and early postoperative complications. Ophthalmology2008; 115: 497–502.
28.
RoseL., BriceñoC.A., StarkW.J., GloriaD.G., JunA.S.Assessment of eye bank-prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology2008; 115: 279–86.
