Abstract
Purpose
To compare the safety of a single-piece, foldable intraocular lens (IOL) hydroimplantation with that of a standard implantation using an ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD).
Methods
One hundred consecutive patients with bilateral age-related cataract surgery were enrolled into a prospective double-blind study. Each patient's first eye was randomly assigned to a standard implantation technique with an OVD or the hydroimplantation technique, while the fellow eye received the opposite technique. The main outcomes measured were endothelial cell loss, postoperative changes of intraocular pressure (IOP), and the frequency of complications.
Results
The reduction of endothelial cell density 1 month and 6 months after the surgery was 9.76% ± 13.5%, 10.7% ± 12.6%, respectively, in group A (OVD) and 9.07% ± 12.7%, 9.13% ± 13.7%, respectively, in group B (hydroimplantation). The differences were not statistically significant. The mean IOP 2 hours after surgery was 10.19 ± 6.78 mm Hg in group A and 9.92 ± 7.01 mm Hg in group B. Twenty-four hours and 1 month after surgery, the mean IOP was 14.52 ± 5.59 mm Hg and 13.21 ± 3.5 mm Hg, respectively, in group A, and 15.45 ± 5.77 mm Hg and 13.1 ± 3.44 mm Hg, respectively, in group B. The differences between groups A and B were not statistically significant.
Conclusions
The hydroimplantation technique is a safe technique for single-piece foldable IOL implantation. There was no increase in intraoperative and postoperative complications compared with the standard implantation technique using an OVD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.