Pelvic discontinuity is a complex problem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Although rare, the incidence is likely to increase due to the ageing population and the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties being performed. The various surgical options available to solve this problem include plating, massive allografts, reconstruction rings, custom triflanged components and tantalum implants. However, the optimal solution remains controversial. None of the known methods completely solves the major obstacles associated with this problem, such as restoration of massive bone loss, implant failure in the short- and long-term and high complication rates. This review discusses the diagnosis, decision making, and treatment options of pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.
BerryDJLewallenDGHanssenADCabanelaMEPelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am1999;81(12):1692–1702
2.
NoordinSDuncanCPMasriBAGarbuzDSPelvic dissociation in revision total hip arthroplasty: diagnosis and treatment.Instr Course Lect2010;5937–43
3.
PaproskyWSporerSO'RourkeMRThe treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages.Clin Orthop Relat Res2006453(453):183–187
4.
SporerSMO'RourkeMPaproskyWGThe treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision.J Arthroplasty2005;204)(Suppl 279–84
5.
StiehlJBSalujaRDienerTReconstruction of major column defects and pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty2000;15(7):849–857
6.
D'AntonioJACapelloWNBordenLSClassification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res1989(243):126–137
DeBoerDKChristieMJBrinsonMFMorrisonJCRevision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity.J Bone Joint Surg Am2007;89(4):835–840
9.
KosashviliYBacksteinDSafirOLaksteinDGrossAEAcetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity.J Bone Joint Surg Br2009;91(7):870–876
10.
SporerSMPaproskyWGAcetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity.J Arthroplasty2006216 Suppl 287–90
11.
WeedenSHSchmidtRHThe use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects.J Arthroplasty2007226 Suppl 2151–155
12.
IorioRRobbWJHealyWLOrthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic.J Bone Joint Surg Am2008;90(7):1598–1605
13.
KarrholmJ GGHerbertsPThe Swedish hip arthroplasty register, annual report2006
14.
KurtzSMowatFOngKChanNLauEHalpernMPrevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.J Bone Joint Surg Am2005;87(7):1487–1497
15.
LiebermanJRCemented femoral revision: lest we forget.J Arthroplasty2005;204)(Suppl 272–74
16.
SporerSMBottrosJJHulstJBKancherlaVKMoricMPaproskyWGAcetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity?Clin Orthop Relat Res2012;470(11):3156–3163
17.
PaproskyWGPeronaPGLawrenceJMAcetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty.A 6-year follow-up evaluationJ Arthroplasty1994;9(1):33–44
18.
WendtMCAdlerMATrousdaleRTMabryTMCabanelaMEEffectiveness of false profile radiographs in detection of pelvic discontinuity.J Arthroplasty2012;27(7):1408–1412
19.
GioriNJSidkyAOLateral and high-angle oblique radiographs of the pelvis aid in diagnosing pelvic discontinuity after total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty2011;26(1):110–112
20.
ChiangPPBurkeDWFreibergAARubashHEOsteolysis of the pelvis: evaluation and treatment.Clin Orthop Relat Res2003(417):164–174
21.
BambergFDierksANikolaouKReiserMFBeckerCRJohnsonTRMetal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation.Eur Radiol2011;21(7):1424–1429
22.
GrossAERevision arthroplasty of the acetabulum with restoration of bone stock.Clin Orthop Relat Res1999;369198–207
23.
VillanuevaMRios-LunaAPereiro De LamoJFahandez-SaddiHBöstromMPA review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.HSS J2008;4(2):128–137
24.
ChristieMJBarringtonSABrinsonMFRuhlingMEDeBoerDKBridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results.Clin Orthop Relat Res2001;393216–227
25.
RogersBAWhittingham-JonesPMMitchellPASafirOABircherMDGrossAEThe reconstruction of periprosthetic pelvic discontinuity.J Arthroplasty2012;27(8):1499–1506e1
26.
EggliSMüllerCGanzRRevision surgery in pelvic discontinuity: an analysis of seven patients.Clin Orthop Relat Res2002(398):136–145
27.
GoodmanSSaastamoinenHShashaNGrossAComplications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty2004;19(4):436–446
28.
SpringerBDBerryDJCabanelaMEHanssenADLewallenDGEarly postoperative transverse pelvic fracture: a new complication related to revision arthroplasty with an uncemented cup.J Bone Joint Surg Am2005;87(12):2626–2631
29.
PollockFHWhitesideLAThe fate of massive allografts in total hip acetabular revision surgery.J Arthroplasty1992;7(3):271–276
PaproskyWGSporerSSMurphyBPAddressing severe bone deficiency: what a cage will not do.J Arthroplasty2007;224)(Suppl 1111–115
32.
BerryDJAntiprotrusio cages for acetabular revision.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004;420106–112
33.
SymeonidesPPPetsatodesGEPournarasJDKapetanosGAChristodoulouAGMarougiannisDJThe Effectiveness of the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular bone deficiency: five to twenty-one years’ follow-up.J Arthroplasty2009;24(2):168–174
34.
RegisDSandriABonettiIBortolamiOBartolozziPA minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity.J Arthroplasty2012;27(6):1057–1063e1
35.
TauntonMJFehringTKEdwardsPBernasekTHoltGEChristieMJPelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option.Clin Orthop Relat Res2012470(2):428–434
36.
HoltGEDennisDAUse of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004;429209–214
37.
ElkinsJMCallaghanJJBrownTDThe 2014 Frank Stinchfield Award: The ‘Landing Zone’ for Wear and Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Smaller Than We Thought: A Computational Analysis.Clin Orthop Relat Res2014
38.
SuEPPellicciPMThe role of constrained liners in total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res2004;420122–129
39.
WilliamsJTJrRaglandPSClarkeSConstrained components for the unstable hip following total hip arthroplasty: a literature review.Int Orthop2007;31(3):273–277
40.
ShraderMWParviziJLewallenDGThe use of a constrained acetabular component to treat instability after total hip arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am2003;85(11):2179–2183
41.
PrudhonJLSteffannFFerreiraAVerdierRAslanianTCatonJCementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision.Int Orthop2014
42.
CivininiRCarulliCMatassiFNistriLInnocentiMA dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions.Clin Orthop Relat Res2012;470(12):3542–3548
43.
PlummerDRHaughomBDDella ValleCJDual mobility in total hip arthroplasty.Orthop Clin North Am2014;45(1):1–8
44.
BoyerBPhilippotRGeringerJFarizonFPrimary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips.Int Orthop2012;36(3):511–518
