Metal-on-metal bearings were re-popularised in the late 1990s with the introduction of modern hip resurfacing. Large diameter (LD) metal-on-metal (MoM) hips became more prevalent and have been the least successful group of hip implants ever used. They were rapidly adopted from 2004 until the British Hip Society stopped their use in 2012. Well functioning MoM hip results (including the BHR and Metasul) are hidden in the mire of poor results from the group of all MoM bearings.
We have reviewed what happened and we make 3 observations. Firstly, collaboration between surgeons and then between surgeons and other disciplines, first identified and then solved the clinical management problems. Secondly, the problems with MoM hips occurred because hip simulation was inadequate at predicting performance in patients. They gave no indications of the biological effects of wear in the human environment. Lastly, retrieval of failed implants was essential to understanding why failure occurred.
These lessons must never be forgotten and must form the basis by which new or altered implants are introduced and how they should be monitored. This will enable safer innovation for patients, surgeons and manufacturers. The problems with MoM hips will not have been in vain.
HaddadF.S., ThakrarR.R., HartA.J.Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2011; 93(5): 572–579.
2.
BozicK.J., KurtzS., LauE.The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2009; 91(7): 1614–1620.
McMinnD., DanielJ.History and modern concepts in surface replacement.Proc Inst Mech Eng H.2006; 220(2): 239–251.
5.
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry 2014 Annual Report.https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au. Accessed 06 May 2015.
6.
HartA.J., SabahS., HenckelJ.The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2009; 91(6): 738–744.
7.
LangtonD.J., JoyceT.J., JamesonS.S.Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2011; 93(2): 164–171.
8.
PanditH., Glyn-JonesS., McLardy-SmithP.Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2008; 90(7): 847–851.
9.
HeathJ.C., FreemanM.A., SwansonS.A.Carcinogenic properties of wear particles from prostheses made in cobalt-chromium alloy.Lancet.1971; 1(7699): 564–566.
10.
VisuriT., PukkalaE., PaavolainenP., PulkkinenP., RiskaE.B.Cancer risk after metal on metal and polyethylene on metal total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1996; 329(Suppl): S280–S289.
11.
VisuriT., PukkalaE., PulkkinenP., PaavolainenP.Decreased cancer risk in patients who have been operated on with total hip and knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis: a metaanalysis of 6 Nordic cohorts with 73,000 patients.Acta Orthop Scand.2003; 74(3): 351–360.
12.
VisuriT.I., PukkalaE., PulkkinenP., PaavolainenP.Cancer incidence and causes of death among total hip replacement patients: a review based on Nordic cohorts with a special emphasis on metal-on-metal bearings.Proc Inst Mech Eng H.2006; 220(2): 399–407.
13.
CaseC.P.Chromosomal changes after surgery for joint replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2001; 83(8): 1093–1095.
14.
CaseC.P., LangkamerV.G., HowellR.T.Preliminary observations on possible premalignant changes in bone marrow adjacent to worn total hip arthroplasty implants.Clin Orthop Relat Res.1996; 329(Suppl): S269–S279.
15.
DunstanE., LadonD., Whittingham-JonesP., CarringtonR., BriggsT.W.Chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients with metal-on-metal hip bearings.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2008; 90(3): 517–522.
16.
SmithA.J., DieppeP., PorterM., BlomA.W.; National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Risk of cancer in first seven years after metal-on-metal hip replacement compared with other bearings and general population: linkage study between the National Joint Registry of England and Wales and hospital episode statistics.BMJ.2012; 344(apr03 1): e2383.
17.
HartA.J., QuinnP.D., SampsonB.The chemical form of metallic debris in tissues surrounding metal-on-metal hips with unexplained failure.Acta Biomater.2010; 6(11): 4439–4446.
18.
BradberryS.M., WilkinsonJ.M., FernerR.E.Systemic toxicity related to metal hip prostheses.Clin Toxicol (Phila).2014; 52(8): 837–847.
19.
OldenburgM., WegnerR., BaurX.Severe cobalt intoxication due to prosthesis wear in repeated total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty.2009; 24(5): 825 e15-20.
20.
ZywielM.G., BrandtJ.M., OvergaardC.B., CheungA.C., TurgeonT.R., SyedK.A.Fatal cardiomyopathy after revision total hip replacement for fracture of a ceramic liner.Bone Joint J.2013; 95(1): 31–37.
21.
MachadoC., AppelbeA., WoodR.Arthroprosthetic cobaltism and cardiomyopathy.Heart Lung Circ.2012; 21(11): 759–760.
22.
PrenticeJ.R., ClarkM.J., HoggardN.Metal-on-metal hip prostheses and systemic health: a cross-sectional association study 8 years after implantation.PLoS ONE.2013; 8(6): e66186.
23.
SabahS.A., MitchellA.W., HenckelJ., SandisonA., SkinnerJ.A., HartA.J.Magnetic resonance imaging findings in painful metal-on-metal hips: a prospective study.J Arthroplasty.2011; 26(1): 71–6 76.e1-2.
24.
SiddiquiI.A., SabahS.A., SatchithanandaK.Cross-sectional imaging of the metal-on-metal hip prosthesis: the London ultrasound protocol.Clin Radiol.2013; 68(8): e472–e478.
25.
TomsA.P., MarshallT.J., CahirJ.MRI of early symptomatic metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective review of radiological findings in 20 hips.Clin Radiol.2008; 63(1): 49–58.
26.
AndersonH., TomsA.P., CahirJ.G., GoodwinR.W., WimhurstJ., NolanJ.F.Grading the severity of soft tissue changes associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements: reliability of an MR grading system.Skeletal Radiol.2011; 40(3): 303–307.
27.
HartA.J., SatchithanandaK., LiddleA.D.Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2012; 94(4): 317–325.
28.
DaviesA.P., WillertH.G., CampbellP.A., LearmonthI.D., CaseC.P.An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2005; 87(1): 18–27.
29.
SampsonB., HartA.Clinical usefulness of blood metal measurements to assess the failure of metal-on-metal hip implants.Ann Clin Biochem.2012; 49(Pt 2): 118–131.
30.
HartA.J., SabahS.A., BandiA.S.Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2011; 93(10): 1308–1313.
HartA.J., SabahS.A., SampsonB.Surveillance of Patients with Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Prostheses: A Prospective Cohort Study to Investigate the Relationship Between Blood Metal Ion Levels and Implant Failure.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2014; 96(13): 1091–1099.
33.
PowellJ., PapadakiA., HandJ., HartA., McRobbieD.Numerical simulation of SAR induced around Co-Cr-Mo hip prostheses in situ exposed to RF fields associated with 1.5 and 3T MRI body coils.Magn Reson Med.2012; 68(3): 960–968.
34.
BerberR., PappasY., KhooM.A new approach to managing patients with problematic metal hip implants: the use of an Internet-enhanced multidisciplinary team meeting: AAOS exhibit selection.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2015; 97(4): e20.
35.
FisherJ., HuX.Q., StewartT.D.Wear of surface engineered metal-on-metal hip prostheses.J Mater Sci Mater Med.2004; 15(3): 225–235.
36.
FisherJ., HuX.Q., TipperJ.L.An in vitro study of the reduction in wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses using surface-engineered femoral heads.Proc Inst Mech Eng H.2002; 216(4): 219–230.
37.
MHRA.Medical Device Alert: MDA/2010/069, DePuy ASR hip replacement implants. 2010.
38.
UnderwoodR., MatthiesA., CannP., SkinnerJ.A., HartA.J.A comparison of explanted Articular Surface Replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing components.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2011; 93(9): 1169–1177.
39.
MatthiesA.K., HenckelJ., SkinnerJ.A., HartA.J.A retrieval analysis of explanted Durom metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties.Hip Int.2011; 21(6): 724–731.
40.
HartA.J., Muirhead-AllwoodS., PorterM.Which factors determine the wear rate of large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements? Multivariate analysis of two hundred and seventy-six components.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2013; 95(8): 678–685.
41.
HartA.J., SkinnerJ.A., HenckelJ., SampsonB., GordonF.Insufficient acetabular version increases blood metal ion levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2011; 469(9): 2590–2597.
42.
JacobsJ.J., WimmerM.A.An important contribution to our understanding of the performance of the current generation of metal-on-metal hip replacements.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2013; 95(8): e53.
43.
BalB.S., LoweJ.A., HillardA.E.Muscle Damage in Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty: MRI Evidence That It Is Not Significant. In: DuWeliusP.J., AzarF.M., eds. Instructional Course Lectures 57.Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.2008; pp. 223–229.
