Nanostructures play important roles in vivo, where nanoscaled features of extracellular matrix (ECM) components influence cell behavior and resultant tissue formation. This review summarizes some of the recent developments in fostering new concepts and approaches to nanofabrication, such as top-down and bottom-up and combinations of the two. As in vitro investigations demonstrate that man-made nanotopography can be used to control cell reactions to a material surface, its potential application in implant design and tissue engineering becomes increasingly evident. Therefore, we present recent progress in directing cell fate in the field of cell mechanics, which has grown rapidly over the last few years, and in various tissue-engineering applications. The main focus is on the initial responses of cells to nanostructured surfaces and subsequent influences on cellular functions. Specific examples are also given to illustrate the potential nanostructures may have for biomedical applications and regenerative medicine.
BiggsM.J.P., RichardsR.G., McFarlaneS., WilkinsonC.D.W., OreffoR.O.C., DalbyM.J.Adhesion formation of primary human osteoblasts and the functional response of mesenchymal stem cells to 330 nm deep microgrooves. J R Soc Interface.2008; 5 (27): 1231–1242. Medline doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0035
2.
SmithH.I., SchattenburgM.L., HectorS.D.. X-ray nanolithography: Extension to the limits of the lithographic process. Microelectron Eng.1996; 32 (1-4): 143–158. doi: 10.1016/0167-9317(95)00183-2
3.
HiroshimaH., OkayamaS., OguraM.. Electron beam writing and direct processing system for nanolithography. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A.1995; 363 (1-2): 73–78. doi: 10.1016/0168-9002(95)00151-4
WoodM.A.Colloidal lithography and current fabrication techniques producing in-plane nanotopography for biological applications. J R Soc Interface.2007; 4 (12): 1–17. Medline doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0149
6.
MuthukumarM., OberC.K., ThomasE.L.Competing Interactions and Levels of Ordering in Self-Organizing Polymeric. Mater Sci.1997; 277 (5330): 1225–1232.
7.
GrothT., LiuZ-M, NiepelM.. Chemical and Physical Modifications of Biomaterial Surfaces to Control Adhesion of Cells. In: ShastriV.P., AltankovG., LendleinA. (eds). Advances in Regenerative Medicine: Role of Nanotechnology, and Engineering Principles.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2010: 253–284.
8.
StuppS.I., BraunP.V.Molecular Manipulation of Microstructures: Biomaterials, Ceramics, and Semiconductors. Science.1997; 277 (5330): 1242–1248. Medline doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1242
9.
RoachP., ParkerT., GadegaardN., AlexanderM.R.Surface strategies for control of neuronal cell adhesion: A review. Surf Sci Rep.2010; 65 (6): 145–173. doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2010.07.001
LangfordR.M., Petford-LongA.K., RommeswinkleM., EgelkampS.Application of a focused ion beam system to micro and nanoengineering. Mater Sci Technol.2002; 18: 743–748. doi: 10.1179/026708302225003893
12.
GatesB.D., XuQ., StewartM., RyanD., WillsonC.G., WhitesidesG.M.New Approaches to Nanofabrication: Molding, Printing, and Other Techniques. Chem Rev.2005; 105 (4): 1171–1196. Medline doi: 10.1021/cr030076o
ArnoldM., Cavalcanti-AdamE.A., GlassR.. Activation of Integrin Function by Nanopatterned Adhesive Interfaces. ChemPhysChem.2004; 5 (3): 383–388. Medline doi: 10.1002/cphc.200301014
18.
WolframT., BelzF., SchoenT., SpatzJ.P.Site-specific presentation of single recombinant proteins in defined nanoarrays. Biointerphases.2007; 2 (1): 44–48. Medline doi: 10.1116/1.2713991
19.
KrishnamoorthyS., HinderlingC., HeinzelmannH.Nanoscale patterning with block copolymers. Mater Today.2006; 9 (9): 40–47. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71621-2
GeldhauserT., LeidererP., BonebergJ., WalheimS., SchimmelT.Generation of Surface Energy Patterns by Single Pulse Laser Interference on Self-Assembled Monolayers. Langmuir.2008; 24 (22): 13155–13160. Medline doi: 10.1021/la801812j
24.
FloryP.J.Principles of Polymer Chemistry.Princeton, NJ: Cornell University Press; 1953.
BöltauM., WalheimS., MlynekJ., KrauschG., SteinerU.Surface-induced structure formation of polymer blends on patterned substrates. Nature.1998; 391 (6670): 877–879. doi: 10.1038/36075
27.
GeogheganM., KrauschG.Wetting at polymer surfaces and interfaces. Prog Polym Sci.2003; 28 (2): 261–302. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6700(02)00080-1
28.
HechtU., SchilzC.M., StratmannM.Influence of Relative Humidity during Film Formation Processes on the Structure of Ultrathin Polymeric Films. Langmuir.1998; 14 (23): 6743–6748. doi: 10.1021/la9804987
29.
SprengerM., WalheimS., BudkowskiA., SteinerU.Hierarchic Structure Formation in Binary and Ternary Polymer Blends. Interface Sci.2003; 11 (2): 225–235. doi: 10.1023/A: 1022182930454
30.
MaruyamaN., KoitoT., NishidaJ.. Mesoscopic patterns of molecular aggregates on solid substrates. Thin Solid Films.1998; 327–329: 854–856. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(98)00777-9
31.
CuiL., PengJ., DingY., LiX., HanY.Ordered porous polymer films via phase separation in humidity environment. Polymer (Guildf).2005; 46 (14): 5334–5340. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.018
StranickS.J., KamnaM.M., WeissP.S.Nucleation, formation, and stability of benzene islands on Cu {111}. Nanotechnology.1996; 7 (4): 443–446. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/7/4/026
39.
BrzoskaJ.B., ShahidzadehN., RondelezF.Evidence of a transition temperature for the optimum deposition of grafted monolayer coatings. Nature.1992; 360 (6406): 719–721. doi: 10.1038/360719a0
40.
IimuraK-i, NakajimaY., KatoT.A study on structures and formation mechanisms of self-assembled monolayers of n-alkyltrichlorosilanes using infrared spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. Thin Solid Films.2000; 379 (1-2): 230–239. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01544-3
41.
SethuramanA., HanM., KaneR.S., BelfortG.Effect of Surface Wettability on the Adhesion of Proteins. Langmuir.2004; 20 (18): 7779–7788. Medline doi: 10.1021/la049454q
42.
ChapmanR.G., OstuniE., YanL., WhitesidesG.M.Preparation of Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers (SAMs) That Resist Adsorption of Proteins Using the Reaction of Amines with a SAM That Presents Interchain Carboxylic Anhydride Groups. Langmuir.2000; 16 (17): 6927–6936. doi: 10.1021/la991579l
43.
ChoiI., KimY., KangS.K., LeeJ., YiJ.Phase Separation of a Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayer Prepared via a Step-wise Method. Langmuir.2006; 22 (11): 4885–4889. Medline doi: 10.1021/la0519406
44.
ChengJ.Y., RossC.A., ThomasE.L., SmithH.I., VancsoG.J.Fabrication of nanostructures with long-range order using block copolymer lithography. Appl Phys Lett.2002; 81 (19): 3657–3659. doi: 10.1063/1.1519356
45.
ChengJ.Y., MayesA.M., RossC.A.Nanostructure engineering by templated self-assembly of block copolymers. Nat Mater.2004; 3 (11): 823–828. Medline doi: 10.1038/nmat1211
46.
MauryP., PéterM., MahalingamV., ReinhoudtD.N., HuskensJ.Patterned Self-Assembled Monolayers on Silicon Oxide Prepared by Nanoimprint Lithography and Their Applications in Nanofabrication. Adv Funct Mater.2005; 15 (3): 451–457. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200400284
47.
Crespo-BielO., DordiB., ReinhoudtD.N., HuskensJ.Supramolecular Layer-by-Layer Assembly: Alternating Adsorptions of Guest- and Host-Functionalized Molecules and Particles Using Multivalent Supramolecular Interactions. J Am Chem Soc.2005; 127 (20): 7594–7600. Medline doi: 10.1021/ja051093t
48.
HuskensJ.Patterned 2D and 3D Assemblies of Nanoparticles on Molecular Printboards. Adv Sci Technol.2006; 51: 105–114.
49.
ChowdhuryD.Combination of self-assembly and nanolithography as an effective nanofabrication methodology for device realization. Current Science Association;2009; 96 (7): 923–932.
SabbatiniL., ZamboninP.G.Surface characterization of advanced polymers.Weinheim, New York, Basel, Cambridge, Tokyo: VCH, Akademie Verlag GmbH; 1993.
52.
RatnerB.D.Surface modification of polymers: chemical, biological and surface analytical challenges. Biosens Bioelectron.1995; 10 (9-10): 797–804. Medline doi: 10.1016/0956-5663(95)99218-A
53.
LiH., KhorK., CheangP.Thermal sprayed hydroxyapatite splats: nanostructures, pore formation mechanisms and TEM characterization. Biomaterials.2004; 25 (17): 3463–3471. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.051
54.
WangL., ChowP., PhanT., LimI., YangY.Fabrication and characterization of nanostructured and thermosensitive polymer membranes for wound healing and cell grafting. Adv Funct Mater.2006; 16 (9): 1171–1178. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200500408
55.
TurellM.B., BellareA.A study of the nanostructure and tensile properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials.2004; 25 (17): 3389–3398. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.027
56.
HsuS-H, TangC-M, LinCCC-C. Biocompatibility of poly([var epsilon]-caprolactone)/poly(ethylene glycol) di-block copolymers with nanophase separation. Biomaterials.2004; 25 (25): 5593–5601. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.061
57.
PolizuS., MaugeyM., PoulinS., PoulinP., YahiaL.Nanoscale surface of carbon nanotube fibers for medical applications: Structure and chemistry revealed by TOF-SIMS analysis. Appl Surf Sci.2006; 252 (19): 6750–6753. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.262
58.
RameshbabuN., RaoK.Microwave synthesis, characterization and in-vitro evaluation of nanostructured biphasic calcium phosphates. Curr Appl Phys.2009; 9 (1): S29–S31. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2008.08.018
59.
HrkachJ.S., PeracchiaM.T., DombA., LotanN., LangerR.Nanotechnology for biomaterials engineering: structural characterization of amphiphilic polymeric nanoparticles by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Biomaterials.1997; 18 (1): 27–30. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00077-4
60.
AbidianM.R., MartinD.C.Experimental and theoretical characterization of implantable neural microelectrodes modified with conducting polymer nanotubes. Biomaterials.2008; 29 (9): 1273–1283. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.022
61.
LoirA., GarrelieF., DonnetC.. Mechanical and tribological characterization of tetrahedral diamond-like carbon deposited by femtosecond pulsed laser deposition on pre-treated orthopaedic biomaterials. Appl Surf Sci.2005; 247 (1-4): 225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.01.129
BoudouT., CrouzierT., NicolasC., RenK., PicartC.Polyelectrolyte multilayer nanofilms used as thin materials for cell mechano-sensitivity studies. Macromol Biosci.2011; 11 (1): 77–89.
64.
TurellM., BellareA.A study of the nanostructure and tensile properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials.2004; 25 (17): 3389–3398. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.027
65.
TeodorE., LitescuS., PetcuC., MihalacheM., SomoghiR.Nano-structured Biomaterials with Controlled Properties Synthesis and Characterization. Nanoscale Res Lett.2009; 4 (6): 544–549. Medline doi: 10.1007/s11671-009-9278-x
66.
WiederrechtG. (ed). Handbook of Nanofabrication.Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010.
SiedleckiC.A., MarchantR.E.Atomic force microscopy for characterization of the biomaterial interface. Biomaterials.1998; 19 (4-5): 441–454. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00222-6
69.
MagonovS., WhangboM., WeissW.Surface Analysis with STM and AFM: Experimental and Theoretical Aspects of Image Analysis.Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH; 2007: 16–20. doi: 10.1002/9783527615117
70.
MichlerG.H.Overview about Techniques. Electron Microscopy of Polymers.Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2008; 7–14.
71.
MerkelR., NassoyP., LeungA., RitchieK., EvansE.Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy. Nature.1999; 397 (6714): 50–53. Medline doi: 10.1038/16219
72.
AsranA.S., RazghandiK., AggarwalN., MichlerG.H., GrothT.Nanofibers from Blends of Polyvinyl Alcohol and Polyhydroxy Butyrate As Potential Scaffold Material for Tissue Engineering of Skin. Biomacromolecules.2010; 11 (12): 3413–3421. Medline doi: 10.1021/bm100912v
73.
KalitaS., BhattH.Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite doped with magnesium and zinc: Synthesis and characterization. Mater Sci Eng C.2007; 27 (4): 837–848. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2006.09.036
FaenovA., PikuzT., FukudaY.. Ionography of nanostructures with the use of a laser plasma of cluster targets. JETP Lett.2009; 89 (10): 485–491. doi: 10.1134/S0021364009100038
YangK., YoonK., ChoiK., LeeH.The direct nano-patterning of ZnO using nanoimprint lithography with ZnO-sol and thermal annealing. Microelectron Eng.2009; 86 (11): 2228–2231. doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2009.03.078
78.
WangX., YuG., LinC.. Thick GaN Grown on a Nano-porous GaN Template by Hydride Vapor Phase Epitaxy. Electrochem Solid-State Lett.2008; 11 (10): H273–H275. doi: 10.1149/1.2943662
79.
MillironD.J., RaouxS., ShelbyR.M., Jordan-SweetJ.Solution-phase deposition and nanopatterning of GeSbSe phase-change materials. Nat Mater.2007; 6 (5): 352–356. Medline doi: 10.1038/nmat1887
80.
PascaleA., GentileP., EymeryJ.. Ge quantum dots growth on nanopatterned Si (0 0 1) surface: Morphology and stress relaxation study. Surf Sci.2006; 600 (16): 3187–3193. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.06.004
ChaoW., HarteneckB., LiddleJ., AndersonE., AttwoodD.Soft X-ray microscopy at a spatial resolution better than 15 nm. Nature.2005; 435 (7046): 1210–1213. Medline doi: 10.1038/nature03719
83.
NehmR.Die obersten Schichten genau im Blick. Nachrichten aus der Chemie.2010; 58 (5): 570–572. doi: 10.1002/nadc.201071521
84.
Guerquin-KernJ-L, WuT-D, QuintanaC., CroisyA.Progress in analytical imaging of the cell by dynamic secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS microscopy). Biochim Biophys Acta.2005; 1724 (3): 228–38. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.05.013
85.
DunnD.N., HullR.Reconstruction of three-dimensional chemistry and geometry using focused ion beam microscopy. Appl Phys Lett.1999; 75 (21): 3414–3416. doi: 10.1063/1.125311
86.
MartinezE., EngelE., López-IglesiasC., MillsC., PlanellJ., SamitierJ.Focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy characterization of cell behavior on polymer micro-/nanopatterned substrates: A study of cell-substrate interactions. Micron.2008; 39 (2): 111–116. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2006.12.003
87.
PraterC., KjollerK.New dimensions in nanoscale IR imaging & spectroscopy. Spectrum Europe (LOT-Oriel Group)2010; 11: 2.
StammM.Polymer surfaces and interfaces: characterization, modification and applications: Springer. 2008.
91.
FangC., DrelichJ.Theoretical contact angles on a nano-heterogeneous surface composed of parallel apolar and polar strips. Langmuir.2004; 20 (16): 6679–6684. Medline doi: 10.1021/la0364587
92.
NeumannA., GoodR.Thermodynamics of contact angles. I. Heterogeneous solid surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci.1972; 38 (2): 341–358. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(72)90251-2
93.
DrelichJ., MillerJ., KumarA., WhitesidesG.Wetting characteristics of liquid drops at heterogeneous surfaces. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp.1994; 93: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/0927-7757(94)02940-7
94.
LarsenS.T., TaboryskiR.A.Cassie-like law using triple phase boundary line fractions for faceted droplets on chemically heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir.2009; 25 (3): 1282–1284. Medline doi: 10.1021/la8030045
95.
TricklerW.J., KhuranaJ., NagvekarA., DashA.Chitosan and Glyceryl Monooleate Nanostructures Containing Gemcitabine: Potential Delivery System for Pancreatic Cancer Treatment. AAPS PharmSciTech.2010; 11 (1): 392–401. Medline doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9393-0
96.
KobayashiN., AsakawaH., FukumaT.Nanoscale potential measurements in liquid by frequency modulation atomic force microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum.2010; 81 (12): 123705. Medline doi: 10.1063/1.3514148
97.
AriasJ.L., ReddyL.H., CouvreurP.Polymeric nanoparticulate system augmented the anticancer therapeutic efficacy of gemcitabine. J Drug Target.2009; 17 (8): 586–598. Medline doi: 10.1080/10611860903105739
98.
CurtisA.S., GadegaardN., DalbyM.J., RiehleM.O., WilkinsonC.D.W., AitchisonG.Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience.2004; 3 (1): 61–65. Medline doi: 10.1109/TNB.2004.824276
99.
FlemmingR.G., MurphyC.J., AbramsG.A., GoodmanS.L., NealeyP.F.Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials.1999; 20 (6): 573–588. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00209-9
100.
EliasonM.T., CharestJ.L., SimmonsB.A., GarciaA.J., KingW.P.Nanoimprint fabrication of polymer cell substrates with combined microscale and nanoscale topography. J Vac Sci Technol B.2007; 25 (4): L31–L34. doi: 10.1116/1.2748792
101.
HuW., YimE.K.F., ReanoR.M., LeongK.W., PangS.W.Effects of nanoimprinted patterns in tissue-culture polystyrene on cell behavior.2005. AVS.
102.
CrouchA.S., MillerD., LuebkeK.J., HuW.Correlation of anisotropic cell behaviors with topographic aspect ratio. Biomaterials.2009; 30 (8): 1560–1567. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.041
103.
KunzmannA., AnderssonB., ThurnherrT., KrugH., ScheyniusA., FadeelB.Toxicology of engineered nanomaterials: Focus on biocompatibility, biodistribution and biodegradation. Biochim Biophys Acta.2011; 1810 (3): 361–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.04.007
104.
SimchiA., TamjidE., PishbinF., BoccacciniA.R.Recent progress in inorganic and composite coatings with bactericidal capability for orthopaedic applications. Nanomedicine.2011; 7 (1): 22–39. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2010.10.005
105.
KayatJ., GajbhiyeV., TekadeR.K., JainN.K.Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes: a systematic report. Nanomedicine.2011; 7 (1): 40–49. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2010.06.008
DalbyM.J., BerryC.C., RiehleM.O., SutherlandD.S., AgheliH., CurtisA.S.Attempted endocytosis of nano-environment produced by colloidal lithography by human fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res.2004; 295 (2): 387–394. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.02.004
108.
CurtisA.S., WilkinsonC.D.Reactions of cells to topography. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed.1998; 9: 1313–1329. Medline doi: 10.1163/156856298X00415
109.
MillerD.C., HaberstrohK.M., WebsterT.J.Mechanism(s) of increased vascular cell adhesion on nanostructured poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) films. J Biomed Mater Res A.2005; 73A (4): 476–484. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30318
CousinsB.G., DohertyP., WilliamsR., FinkJ., GarveyM.The effect of silica nanoparticulate coatings on cellular response. J Mater Sci Mater Med.2004; 15 (4): 355–359. Medline doi: 10.1023/B: JMSM.0000021101.64938.b3
112.
FanY.W., CuiF.Z., HouS.P., XuQ.Y., ChenL.N., LeeI.S.Culture of neural cells on silicon wafers with nano-scale surface topograph. J Neurosci Methods.2002; 120 (1): 17–23. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00181-4
113.
ButtiglieriS., PasquiD., MiglioriM.. Endothelization and adherence of leucocytes to nanostructured surfaces. Biomaterials.2003; 24 (16): 2731–2738. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00088-7
114.
BiggsM.J., RichardsR.G., DalbyM.J.Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomedicine.2010; 6 (5): 619–633. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2010.01.009
115.
BershadskyA.D., BalabanN.Q., GeigerB.Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol.2003; 19: 677–695. Medline doi: 10.1146/annurev.cell-bio.19.111301.153011
116.
Wójciak-StothardB., MadejaZ., KorohodaW., CurtisA., WilkinsonC.Activation of macrophage-like cells by multiple grooved substrata. Topographical control of cell behaviour. Cell Biol Int.1995; 19: 485–490. Medline doi: 10.1006/cbir.1995.1092
BershadskyA.D., BalabanN.Q., GeigerB.Adhesion-Dependent Cell Mechanosensitivity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol.2003; 19 (1): 677–695. Medline doi: 10.1146/annurev.cell-bio.19.111301.153011
119.
CurtisA., WilkinsonC.Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials.1997; 18 (24): 1573–1583. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00144-0
120.
den BraberE.T., de RuijterJ.E., GinselL.A., von RecumA.F., JansenJ.A.Quantitative analysis of fibroblast morphology on microgrooved surfaces with various groove and ridge dimensions. Biomaterials.1996; 17 (21): 2037–2044. Medline doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)00032-4
BallM., GrantD.M., LoW-J, ScotchfordC.A.The effect of different surface morphology and roughness on osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A.2008; 86A (3): 637–647. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31652
123.
LoesbergW.A., te RietJ., van DelftF.C.. The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. Biomaterials.2007; 28 (27): 3944–3951. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.030
124.
CurtisA.S., CaseyB., GallagherJ.O., PasquiD., WoodM.A., WilkinsonC.D.Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nano-topography important? Biophys Chem.2001; 94 (3): 275–283. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0301-4622(01)00247-2
LiliensiekS.J., CampbellS., NealeyP.F., MurphyC.J.The scale of substratum topographic features modulates proliferation of corneal epithelial cells and corneal fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A.2006; 79A (1): 185–192. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30744
128.
FraserS.A., TingY.H., MallonK.S., WendtA.E., MurphyC.J., NealeyP.F.Sub-micron and nanoscale feature depth modulates alignment of stromal fibroblasts and corneal epithelial cells in serum-rich and serum-free media. J Biomed Mater Res A.2008; 86A (3): 725–735. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31519
129.
ArnoldM., Cavalcanti-AdamE.A., GlassR.. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. ChemPhysChem.2004; 5 (3): 383–388. Medline doi: 10.1002/cphc.200301014
130.
Cavalcanti-AdamE.A., VolbergT., MicouletA., KesslerH., GeigerB., SpatzJ.P.Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophys J.2007; 92 (8): 2964–2974. Medline doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.089730
131.
Selhuber-UnkelC., ErdmannT., Lopez-GarciaM., KesslerH., SchwarzU.S., SpatzJ.P.Cell Adhesion Strength Is Controlled by Intermolecular Spacing of Adhesion Receptors. Biophys J.2010; 98 (4): 543–551. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.001
132.
HerselU., DahmenC., KesslerH.RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials.2003; 24 (24): 4385–4415. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00343-0
133.
DalbyM.J., RiehleM.O., SutherlandD.S., AgheliH., CurtisA.S.Fibroblast response to a controlled nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography. J Biomed Mater Res A.2004; 69A (2): 314–322. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.20138
134.
DalbyM.J., ChildsS., RiehleM.O., JohnstoneH.J.H., AffrossmanS., CurtisA.S.G.Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. Biomaterials.2003; 24 (6): 927–935. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00427-1
135.
DalbyM.J., RiehleM.O., JohnstoneH.J., AffrossmanS., CurtisA.S.G.Nonadhesive nanotopography: Fibroblast response to poly(n-butyl methacrylate)-poly(styrene) demixed surface features. J Biomed Mater Res A.2003; 67A (3): 1025–1032. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10139
HatanoK., InoueH., KojoT.. Effect of surface roughness on proliferation and alkaline phosphatase expression of rat calvarial cells cultured on polystyrene. Bone.1999; 25 (4): 439–445. Medline doi: 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00192-1
138.
DalbyM.J., GadegaardN., TareR.. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater.2007; 6 (12): 997–1003. Medline doi: 10.1038/nmat2013
139.
MarlettaG., CiapettiG., SatrianoC., PerutF., SalernoM., BaldiniN.Improved osteogenic differentiation of human marrow stromal cells cultured on ion-induced chemically structured poly-epsilon-caprolactone. Biomaterials.2007; 28 (6): 1132–1140. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.027
140.
YimE.K., PangS.W., LeongK.W.Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. Exp Cell Res.2007; 313 (9): 1820–1829. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.02.031
141.
LeeM.R., KwonK.W., JungH.. Direct differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into selective neurons on nanoscale ridge/groove pattern arrays. Biomaterials.2010; 31 (15): 4360–4366. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.012
CurtisA.The potential for the use of nanofeaturing in medical devices. Expert Rev Med Devices.2005; 2 (3): 293–301. Medline doi: 10.1586/17434440.2.3.293
WebsterT.J., ErgunC., DoremusR.H., SiegelR.W., BiziosR.Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials.2000; 21 (17): 1803–1810. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00075-2
147.
WebsterT.J., GutweinL.G., TepperF.Increased Osteoblast Function on Nanofibered Alumina. 26th Annual Conference on Composites, Advanced Ceramics, Materials, and Structures: B: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.2008: 817–824.
SchiftH., HeydermanL.J., PadesteC., GobrechtJ.Chemical nano-patterning using hot embossing lithography. Microelectron Eng.2002; 61–62: 423–428. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9317(02)00513-0
152.
PalinE., LiuH.N., WebsterT.J.Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation. Nanotechnology.2005; 16 (9): 1828–1835. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/16/9/069
153.
PriceR.L., EliasK.L., HaberstrohK.M., WebsterT.J.Small diameter, high surface energy carbon nanofiber formulations that selectively increase osteoblast function. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings.2002; 7 (11): 261–264.
TamaiN., MyouiA., HiraoM.. A new biotechnology for articular cartilage repair: subchondral implantation of a composite of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite, synthetic polymer (PLA-PEG), and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). Osteoarthritis Cartilage.2005; 13 (5): 405–417. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.12.014
ChengL., ZhangS.M., ChenP.P.. Fabrication and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly (D, L-lactide) composite porous scaffolds for human cartilage. Key Engineering Materials.2006; 309–311: 943–948.
158.
MillerD.C., ThapaA., HaberstrohK.M., WebsterT.J.Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) with nano-structured surface features. Biomaterials.2004; 25 (1): 53–61. Medline doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00471-X
159.
ThapaA., WebsterT.J., HaberstrohK.M.Polymers with nano-dimensional surface features enhance bladder smooth muscle cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A.2003; 67A (4): 1374–1383. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.20037
160.
LiuH., WebsterT.J.Nanomedicine for implants: A review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials.2007; 28 (2): 354–369. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.049
161.
VieuC., CarcenacF., PépinA.. Electron beam lithography: resolution limits and applications. Appl Surf Sci.2000; 164 (1-4): 111–117. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00352-4
162.
MadouM.J.Fundamentals of microfabrication: the science of miniaturization. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2002: 723.
AffrossmanS., StammM.The effect of molecular weight on the topography of thin films of blends of poly(4-bromostyrene) and polystyrene. Colloid Polym Sci.2000; 278 (9): 888–893. doi: 10.1007/s003960000359
MilnerK.R., SiedleckiC.A.Submicron poly(L-lactic acid) pillars affect fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res A.2007; 82A (1): 80–91. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31049
173.
DalbyM.J., YarwoodS.J., RiehleM.O., JohnstoneH.J., AffrossmanS., CurtsiA.S.Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. Exp Cell Res.2002; 276 (1): 1–9. Medline doi: 10.1006/excr.2002.5498
174.
LimJ.Y., DreissA.D., ZhouZ.Y.. The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. Biomaterials.2007; 28 (10): 1787–1797. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.020
175.
HajicharalambousC.S., LichterJ., HixW.T., SwierczewskaM., RubnerM.F., RajagopalanP.Nano- and sub-micron porous polyelectrolyte multilayer assemblies: Biomimetic surfaces for human corneal epithelial cells. Biomaterials.2009; 30 (23-24): 4029–4036. Medline doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.020
176.
HartA., GadegaardN., WilkinsonC.D., OreffoR.O., DalbyM.J.Osteoprogenitor response to low-adhesion nanotopographies originally fabricated by electron beam lithography. J Mater Sci Mater Med.2007; 18 (6): 1211–1218. Medline doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-0157-7
177.
YangJ.Y., TingY.C., LaiJ.Y., LiuH.L., FangH.W., TsaiW.B.Quantitative analysis of osteoblast-like cells (MG63) morphology on nanogrooved substrata with various groove and ridge dimensions. J Biomed Mater Res A.2009; 90A (3): 629–640. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32130
178.
Heydarkhan-HagvallS., ChofC.H., DunnJ.. Influence of systematically varied nano-scale topography on cell morphology and adhesion. Cell Commun Adhes.2007; 14 (5): 181–194. Medline doi: 10.1080/15419060701755594
179.
RussellP., GasiorowskiJ.Z., NealyP.F., MurphyC.J.Response of human trabecular meshwork cells to topographic cues on the nanoscale level. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2008; 49 (2): 629–635. Medline doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1192
