Cusp extension technique (CET) is a reparative surgical procedure for restoring aortic valve function by suturing patches to the compromised native leaflets. Its outcomes are strongly dependent on the ability of the surgeon. We proposed and tested a novel approach on an in vitro model, aimed at standardizing and simplifying the surgical procedure.
Methods
A set of standard pre-cut bovine pericardium patches, available in different sizes, was developed. The surgeon can choose the leaflet-specific patches to be implanted according to the patient anatomy, using a geometrical model of the aortic valve whose inputs are the measured intercommissural distances. The hemodynamic performance of this approach was evaluated on porcine aortic roots in a pulsatile mock loop. Hydrodynamic and kinematic evaluation of the samples was provided.
Results
After CET, mean and maximum pressure drops were 3.1 ± 1.3 mmHg and 25.4 ± 5.0 mmHg respectively, and EOA was 3.8 ± 0.8 cm2. Static regurgitant fraction and closing volumes were 6.9 ± 2.7% and 7.0 ± 1.5 mL, respectively. All the hemodynamics changes induced by the surgery were statistically significant yet clinically irrelevant as compared to baseline. The treatment also induced a statistically significant alteration in the closing time of the valve.
Conclusions
Our approach to cusp extension proved to be reliable and effective in restoring valve functioning, without significantly altering the physiological kinematics. The use of pre-cut patches considerably simplified the surgery, increasing standardization and repeatability.
ManginiA., LemmaM.G., SonciniM.. The aortic interleaf-let triangles annuloplasty: a multidisciplinary appraisal. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2011; 40(4): 851–857.
4.
BoodhwaniM., de KerchoveL., GlineurD.. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2009; 137(2): 286–294.
5.
de KerchoveL., GlineurD., PonceletA.. Repair of aortic leaflet prolapse: a ten-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2008; 34(4): 785–791.
6.
RahimtoolaS.H.Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update. J Am Coll Cardiol.2010; 55(22): 2413–2426.
7.
HongS., YiG., YounY-N, LeeS., YooK-J, ChangB-C. Effect of the prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term clinical outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: A prospective observational study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2013; 146(5): 1098–104.
8.
BarnettS.D., AdN.Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: a trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2009; 137(6): 1422–1429.
9.
DuránC.M., AlonsoJ., GaiteL.. Long-term results of conservative repair of rheumatic aortic valve insufficiency. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.1988; 2(4): 217–223.
10.
CarrJ.A., SavageE.B.Aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency in adults: a contemporary review and comparison with replacement techniques. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2004; 25(1): 6–15.
11.
KalangosA., BeghettiM., BaldovinosA.. Aortic valve repair by cusp extension with the use of fresh autologous pericardium in children with rheumatic aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1999; 118(2): 225–236.
12.
PolimenakosA.C., SathanandamS., BlairC., ElzeinC., RobersonD., IlbawiM.N.Selective tricuspidization and aortic cusp extension valvuloplasty: outcome analysis in infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg.2010; 90(3): 839–846, discussion 846-847.
13.
AhnH., KimK-H, KimY.J.Midterm result of leaflet extension technique in aortic regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2002; 21(3): 465–469.
14.
OdimJ., LaksH., AlladaV., ChildJ., WilsonS., GjertsonD.Results of aortic valve-sparing and restoration with autologous pericardial leaflet extensions in congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg.2005; 80(2): 647–653, discussion 653-654.
15.
PolimenakosA.C., SathanandamS., ElzeinC., BarthM.J., HigginsR.S.D., IlbawiM.N.Aortic cusp extension valvuloplasty with or without tricuspidization in children and adolescents: longterm results and freedom from aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2010; 139(4): 933–941, discussion 941.
16.
KunzelmanK.S., GrandeK.J., DavidT.E., CochranR.P., VerrierE.D.Aortic root and valve relationships. Impact on surgical repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1994; 107(1): 162–170.
17.
ThubrikarM., RobicsekF.A new aortic root prosthesis with compliant sinuses for valve-sparing operations. Ann Thorac Surg.2001; 71(5)(Suppl 1): S318–S322.
18.
LabrosseM.R., BellerC.J., RobicsekF., ThubrikarM.J.Geometric modeling of functional trileaflet aortic valves: development and clinical applications. J Biomech.2006; 39(14): 2665–2672.
de KerchoveL., VismaraR., ManginiA.. In vitro comparison of three techniques for ventriculo-aortic junction annuloplasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2012; 41(5): 1117–1124.
21.
VismaraR., FioreG.B., ManginiA.. A novel approach to the in vitro hydrodynamic study of the aortic valve: mock loop development and test. ASAIO J.2010; 56(4): 279–284.
22.
VismaraR., AntonaC., ManginiA.. In vitro study of aortic valves treated with neo-chordae grafts: hydrodynamics and tensile force measurements. Ann Biomed Eng.2011; 39(3): 1024–1031.
23.
VismaraR., ManginiA., RomagnoniC., ContinoM., RedaelliA., FioreGBAC. In vitro study of a porcine quadricuspid aortic valve. J Heart Valve Dis.2014 [in press].
24.
VismaraRiccardo; LeopaldiAlberto Maria; ManginiAndrea; RomagnoniClaudia; ContinoMonica; AntonaCarlo; FioreG.B.In vitro study of the Aortic Interleaflet Triangle Reshaping. J Biomech.2014; 47(2): 329–33.
25.
LeyhR.G., SchmidtkeC., SieversH.H., YacoubM.H.Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after different types of valve-preserving surgery. Circulation.1999; 100(21): 2153–2160.
26.
SacksM.S., ChuongC.J.Orthotropic mechanical properties of chemically treated bovine pericardium. Ann Biomed Eng.1998; 26(5): 892–902.
27.
ContiC.A., Della CorteA., VottaE.. Biomechanical implications of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve: a finite element study of aortic root function from in vivo data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2010; 140(4): 890–6, 896.e1-2.
28.
Della CorteA., BanconeC., ContiC.A.. Restricted cusp motion in right-left type of bicuspid aortic valves: a new risk marker for aortopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2012; 144(2): 360–9, 369.e1.
29.
MyersP.O., TissotC., ChristensonJ.T., CikirikciogluM., AggounY., KalangosA.Aortic valve repair by cusp extension for rheumatic aortic insufficiency in children: Long-term results and impact of extension material. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2010; 140(4): 836–844.
30.
d'UdekemY., SiddiquiJ., SeamanC.S.. Long-term results of a strategy of aortic valve repair in the pediatric population. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2013; 145(2): 461–467, discussion 461-469.
31.
MayerK., AicherD., FeldnerS., KuniharaT., SchäfersH-J. Repair versus replacement of the aortic valve in active infective endocarditis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2012; 42(1): 122–127.
32.
DavidT.E.Aortic valve repair for active infective endocarditis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2012; 42(1): 127–128.
33.
KalangosA., BeghettiM., BaldovinosA.. Aortic valve repair by cusp extension with the use of fresh autologous pericardium in children with rheumatic aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1999; 118(2): 225–236.
34.
PolimenakosA.C., SathanandamS., BlairC., ElzeinC., RobersonD., IlbawiM.N.Selective tricuspidization and aortic cusp extension valvuloplasty: outcome analysis in infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg.2010; 90(3): 839–846; discussion 846-7.
35.
AhnH., KimK-H, KimY.J.Midterm result of leaflet extension technique in aortic regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2002; 21(3): 465–469.
36.
LabrosseM.R., BellerC.J., RobicsekF., ThubrikarM.J.Geometric modeling of functional trileaflet aortic valves: development and clinical applications. J Biomech.2006; 39(14): 2665–2672.
37.
SwansonM., ClarkR.E.Dimensions and geometric relationships of the human aortic valve as a function of pressure. Circ Res.1974; 35(6): 871–882.
38.
ThubrikarM., PiepgrassW.C., ShanerT.W., NolanS.P.The design of the normal aortic valve. Am J Physiol.1981; 241(6): H795–801.
