Arteriovenous graft patency is limited by terminal occlusion caused by intimal hyperplasia (IH). Motivated by evidence that flow disturbances promote IH progression, a modular anastomotic valve device (MAVD) was designed to isolate the graft from the circulation between dialysis periods (closed position) and enable vascular access during dialysis (open position). The objective of this study was to perform a preliminary computational assessment of the device ability to normalize venous flow between dialysis periods and potentially limit IH development and thrombogenesis.
Methods
Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed to compare flow and wall shear stress (WSS) in a native vein and MAVD prototypes featuring anastomotic angles of 90° and 30°. Low WSS (LWSS) regions prone to IH development were characterized in terms of temporal shear magnitude (TSM), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT). Thrombogenic potential was assessed by investigating the loading history of fluid particles traveling through the device.
Results
The closed MAVD exhibited the same flow characteristics as the native vein (0.3% difference in pressure drop, 3.5% difference in surface-averaged WSS). The open MAVD generated five LWSS regions (TSM <0.5 Pa) exhibiting different degrees of flow reversal (surface-averaged OSI: 0.03–0.36) and stagnation (max RRT: 2.50–37.16). Reduction in anastomotic angle resulted in the suppression of three LWSS regions and overall reductions in flow reversal (surface-averaged OSI <0.21) and stagnation (max RRT <18.05).
Conclusions
This study suggests the ability of the MAVD to normalize venous flow between dialysis periods while generating the typical hemodynamics of end-to-side vein-graft anastomoses during dialysis.
SchwabSJ, HarringtonJT, SinghA, Vascular access for hemodialysis.Kidney Int.1999;55(5):2078–2090.
2.
MillerPE, CarltonD, DeierhoiMH, ReddenDT, AllonM.Natural history of arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients.Am J Kidney Dis.2000;36(1):68–74.
3.
KovalikEC, SchwabSJ.Can venous stenosis be prevented?Semin Dial.2002;12(3):144–145.
4.
SchwabSJ.Hemodialysis vascular access: the Achilles’ heel remains.Kidney Int.2007;72(6):665–666.
5.
AkohJA.Prosthetic arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis.J Vasc Access.2009;10(3):137–147.
6.
ZwolakRM, AdamsMC, ClowesAW.Kinetics of vein graft hyperplasia: association with tangential stress.J Vasc Surg.1987;5(1):126–136.
7.
BerardX, DégliseS, AlonsoF, Role of hemodynamic forces in the ex vivo arterialization of human saphenous veins.J Vasc Surg.2013;57(5):1371–1382.
8.
KraissLW, KirkmanTR, KohlerTR, ZierlerB, ClowesAW.Shear stress regulates smooth muscle proliferation and neointimal thickening in porous polytetrafluoroethylene grafts.Arterioscler Thromb.1991;11(6):1844–1852.
9.
OjhaM, EthierCR, JohnstonKW, CobboldRS.Steady and pulsatile flow fields in an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model.J Vasc Surg.1990;12(6):747–753.
10.
OjhaM.Spatial and temporal variations of wall shear stress within an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model.J Biomech.1993;26(12):1377–1388.
11.
SunamuraM, IshibashiH, KarinoT.Flow patterns and preferred sites of intimal thickening in diameter-mismatched vein graft interpositions.Surgery.2007;141(6):764–776.
12.
GlagovS.Intimal hyperplasia, vascular modeling, and the restenosis problem.Circulation.1994;89(6):2888–2891.
13.
LothF, JonesSA, ZarinsCK, Relative contribution of wall shear stress and injury in experimental intimal thickening at PTFE end-to-side arterial anastomoses.J Biomech Eng.2002;124(1):44–51.
14.
ShoE, NanjoH, ShoM, Arterial enlargement, tortuosity, and intimal thickening in response to sequential exposure to high and low wall shear stress.J Vasc Surg.2004;39(3):601–612.
15.
StaalsenNH, UlrichM, WintherJ, PedersenEM, HowT, NygaardH.The anastomosis angle does change the flow fields at vascular end-to-side anastomoses in vivo.J Vasc Surg.1995;21(3):460–471.
16.
OjhaM, CobboldRS, JohnstonKW.Influence of angle on wall shear stress distribution for an end-to-side anastomosis.J Vasc Surg.1994;19(6):1067–1073.
17.
FreshwaterIJ, MorsiYS, LaiT.The effect of angle on wall shear stresses in a LIMA to LAD anastomosis: numerical modelling of pulsatile flow.Proc Inst Mech Eng H.2006;220(7):743–757.
18.
JacksonZS, IshibashiH, GotliebAI, LangilleBL.Effects of anastomotic angle on vascular tissue responses at end-to-side arterial grafts.J Vasc Surg.2001;34(2):300–307.
19.
FeiDY, ThomasJD, RittgersSE.The effect of angle and flow rate upon hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses: a numerical model study.J Biomech Eng.1994;116(3):331–336.
20.
Ene-IordacheB, CattaneoL, DubiniG, RemuzziA.Effect of anastomosis angle on the localization of disturbed flow in “side-to-end” fistulae for haemodialysis access.Nephrol Dial Transplant.2012.
21.
AkingbaA.Modular arterio-venous shunt device and methods for establishing hemodialytic angioaccess.US Pat No 8,057,421.2011.
22.
AkingbaA.Arteriovenous shunt with integrated surveillance system.US Pat Appl No 13/294,890, Publ No 2012/0059305.2012.
23.
KockHJ, PietschM, KrauseU, WilkeH, EiglerFW.Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems.World J Surg.1998;22(1):12–16.
24.
HenricksonKJ, AxtellRA, HooverSM, Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections and thrombotic events in immunocompromised children by the use of vancomycin/ciprofloxacin/heparin flush solution: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial.J Clin Oncol.2000;18(6):1269–1278.
25.
KiteP, DobbinsBM, WilcoxMH, McMahonMJ.Rapid diagnosis of central-venous-catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter removal.Lancet.1999;354(9189):1504–1507.
26.
MiuraK, SatoY, NakatsukaH, Catheter-directed continuous thrombolysis following aspiration thrombectomy via the ileocolic route for acute portal venous thrombosis: report of two cases.Surg Today.2013;43(11):1310–1315.
27.
ChoYI, KenseyKR.Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel.Part 1: Steady flows. Biorheology.1991;28(3–4):241–262.
28.
BergerSA, JouL-D.Flows in Stenotic Vessels.Annu Rev Fluid Mech.2000;32(1):347–382.
29.
Van TrichtI, De WachterD, TordoirJ, VanherckeD, VerdonckP.Experimental analysis of the hemodynamics in punctured vascular access grafts.ASAIO J.2005;51(4):352–359.
30.
KuDN, GiddensDP, ZarinsCK, GlagovS.Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation.Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis.1985;5(3):293–302.
LeeS-W, AntigaL, SteinmanDA.Correlations among indicators of disturbed flow at the normal carotid bifurcation.J Biomech Eng.2009;131(6):061013.
33.
Van TrichtI, De WachterD, TordoirJ, VerdonckP.Hemodynamics and complications encountered with arteriovenous fistulas and grafts as vascular access for hemodialysis: a review.Ann Biomed Eng.2005;33(9):1142–1157.
34.
ShuMC, HwangNH.Haemodynamics of angioaccess venous anastomoses.J Biomed Eng.1991;13(2):103–112.
35.
FillingerMF, KernsDB, BruchD, ReinitzER, SchwartzRA.Does the end-to-end venous anastomosis offer a functional advantage over the end-to-side venous anastomosis in high-output arteriovenous grafts?J Vasc Surg.1990;12(6):676–688, discussion 688–690.
36.
LongestPW, KleinstreuerC; LongestP. W., KleinstreuerC.Computational haemodynamics analysis and comparison study of arterio-venous grafts.J Med Eng Technol.2000;24(3):102–110.
37.
KruegerU, ZanowJ, ScholzH.Computational fluid dynamics and vascular access.Artif Organs.2002;26(7):571–575.
38.
KruegerU, ZanowJ, ScholzH.Comparison of Two Different Arteriovenous Anastomotic Forms By Numerical 3D Simulation of Blood Flow.Int J Angiol.2000;9(4):226–231.
39.
Van TrichtI, De WachterD, TordoirJ, VerdonckP.Comparison of the hemodynamics in 6mm and 4–7 mm hemodialysis grafts by means of CFD.J Biomech.2006;39(2):226–236.
40.
KeyntonRS, RittgersSE, ShuMC.The effect of angle and flow rate upon hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses: an in vitro model study.J Biomech Eng.1991;113(4):458–463.
41.
MisraM.The basics of hemodialysis equipment.Hemodial Int.2005;9(1):30–36.
42.
SucoskyP, PadalaM, ElhammaliA, BalachandranK, JoH, YoganathanAP.Design of an ex vivo culture system to investigate the effects of shear stress on cardiovascular tissue.J Biomech Eng.2008;130(3):035001.
43.
SunL, RajamannanNM, SucoskyP.Design and validation of a novel bioreactor to subject aortic valve leaflets to side-specific shear stress.Ann Biomed Eng.2011;39(8):2174–2185.
44.
SucoskyP, BalachandranK, ElhammaliA, JoH, YoganathanAP.Altered shear stress stimulates upregulation of endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in a BMP-4- and TGF-beta1-dependent pathway.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.2009;29(2):254–260.
45.
HoehnD, SunL, SucoskyP.Role of Pathologic Shear Stress Alterations in Aortic Valve Endothelial Activation.Cardiovasc Eng Technol.2010;1(2):165–178.
46.
SunL, ChandraS, SucoskyP.Ex vivo evidence for the contribution of hemodynamic shear stress abnormalities to the early pathogenesis of calcific bicuspid aortic valve disease.PLoS ONE.2012;7(10):e48843.
47.
SunL, RajamannanNM, SucoskyP.Defining the role of fluid shear stress in the expression of early signaling markers for calcific aortic valve disease.PLoS One.2013;8(12):e84433.
48.
NiemannAK, UdesenJ, ThrysoeS, Can sites prone to flow induced vascular complications in a-v fistulas be assessed using computational fluid dynamics?J Biomech.2010;43(10):2002–2009.
49.
FanY, XuZ, JiangW, DengX, WangK, SunA.An S-type bypass can improve the hemodynamics in the bypassed arteries and suppress intimal hyperplasia along the host artery floor.J Biomech.2008;41(11):2498–2505.
50.
LothF, FischerPF, ArslanN, Transitional flow at the venous anastomosis of an arteriovenous graft: potential activation of the ERK1/2 mechanotransduction pathway.J Biomech Eng.2003;125(1):49–61.
51.
LeeJ, KimYS, YoonSA, Retrospective review of angiography before cannulation of newly created vascular accesses in hemodialysis patients.J Vasc Interv Radiol.2013;24(9):1309–1315.
52.
LeeT, Roy-ChaudhuryP.Advances and new frontiers in the pathophysiology of venous neointimal hyperplasia and dialysis access stenosis.Adv Chronic Kidney Dis.2009;16(5):329–338.
53.
AsifA, GadaleanFN, MerrillD, Inflow stenosis in arteriovenous fistulas and grafts: a multicenter, prospective study.Kidney Int.2005;67(5):1986–1992.
54.
KhanFA, VeselyTM.Arterial problems associated with dysfunctional hemodialysis grafts: evaluation of patients at high risk for arterial disease.J Vasc Interv Radiol.2002;13(11):1109–1114.
