Removal of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC) usually occurs in dedicated procedure suites and is performed relatively rarely at the bedside. Scarce evidence exists in the literature to assess the safety and success of this procedure when performed during supervised academic training.
Patients and Methods
We conducted a retrospective chart review of all TDC removals performed on an outpatient basis by nephrology fellows under faculty supervision during a 5-year period at an academic Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, basic laboratory studies, pertinent clinical information and procedure-related variables. We evaluated the safety, success and complication rate of this procedure.
Results
We identified 72 TDC removals that met the above criteria. Mean age was 63 ± 10 years. All patients were male and hypertensive, 68% were diabetic and 69% were African-American. Overall, 88% of procedures were performed in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, while the rest had needed temporary dialysis for acute kidney injury. Notably, 49 patients (68%) were taking one or more of aspirin, clopidogrel or warfarin at the time of TDC removal. Overall complication rate was low (<2%). There was no increase in risk of bleeding, even in subjects receiving anti-platelet therapy; only one of the 49 patients (2%) had a minor bleeding complication.
Conclusions
Outpatient TDC removal by trainees was successful and safe in the vast majority of cases (99%). We propose that TDC removal skills should be actively pursued and acquired by all nephrology fellows. This would expand the scope of practice for future general nephrologists and facilitate timely patient care.
MossA.H., VasilakisC., HolleyJ.L., FoulksC.J., PillaiK., McDowellD.E.Use of a silicone dual-lumen catheter with a Dacron cuff as a long-term vascular access for hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis.1990; 16(3): 211–215.
2.
US Renal Data System.USRDS 2013 Annual Data Report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States.National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2013. Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2013.
3.
XueJ.L., DahlD., EbbenJ.P., CollinsA.J.The association of initial hemodialysis access type with mortality outcomes in elderly Medicare ESRD patients. Am J Kidney Dis.2003; 42(5): 1013–1019.
4.
RaynerH.C., BesarabA., BrownW.W., DisneyA., SaitoA., PisoniR.L.Vascular access results from the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS): Performance against kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (K/DOQI) clinical practice guidelines. Am J Kidney Dis.2004; 44(5)(Suppl 2): 22–26.
5.
XueH., IxJ.H., WangW.Hemodialysis access usage patterns in the incident dialysis year and associated catheter-related complications. Am J Kidney Dis.2013; 61(1): 123–130.
6.
BanerjeeT., KimS.J., AstorB., ShafiT., CoreshJ., PoweN.R.Vascular access type, inflammatory markers, and mortality in incident hemodialysis patients: the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) Study. Am J Kidney Dis.2014; 64(6): 954–961.
7.
Roca-Tey R, Arcos E, Comas J, Cao H, Tort J, Catalan Renal Registry Committee; Catalan Renal Registry Committee.Starting hemodialysis with catheter and mortality risk: persistent association in a competing risk analysis. J Vasc Access.2016; 17(1): 20–28.
8.
RaithathaA., McKaneW., KendrayD., EvansC.Catheter access for hemodialysis defines higher mortality in late-presenting dialysis patients. Ren Fail.2010; 32(10): 1183–1188.
9.
LittleM.A., O'RiordanA., LuceyB.A prospective study of complications associated with cuffed, tunnelled haemodialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant.2001; 16(11): 2194–2200.
FülöpT., TapolyaiM., QureshiN.A.The safety and efficacy of bedside removal of tunneled hemodialysis catheters by nephrology trainees. Ren Fail.2013; 35(9): 1264–1268.
12.
RamanathanV., RiosaS., Al-SharifA.H.Characteristics of biofilm on tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheters in the presence and absence of clinical infection. Am J Kidney Dis.2012; 60(6): 976–982.
13.
FülöpT., RodríguezB., KosztaczkyB.A.Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Removals by Non-Interventional Nephrologists: The University of Mississippi Experience. Semin Dial.2015; 28(5): E48–E52. Published online March 17, 2015.
14.
BreamPeter. Tunneled Catheter Removal.Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Interventional Radiology, Podcast Series [cited 2015 August 03]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xqkwe0EIIwQ. Accessed April 10, 2016.
TheinH., RatanjeeS.K.Tethered hemodialysis catheter with retained portions in central vein and right atrium on attempted removal. Am J Kidney Dis.2005; 46(3): e35–e39.
17.
SequeiraA., SachdevaB., AbreoK.Uncommon complications of long-term hemodialysis catheters: adhesion, migration, and perforation by the catheter tip. Semin Dial.2010; 23(1): 100–104.
KohliM.D., TrerotolaS.O., NamyslowskiJ.Outcome of polyester cuff retention following traction removal of tunneled central venous catheters. Radiology.2001; 219(3): 651–654.
FornerisG., SavioD., QuarettiP.Dealing with stuck hemodialysis catheter: state of the art and tips for the nephrologist. J Nephrol.2014; 27(6): 619–625.
22.
VellankiV.S., WatsonD., RajanD.K., BholaC.B., LokC.E.The stuck catheter: a hazardous twist to the meaning of permanent catheters. J Vasc Access.2015; 16(4): 289–293.
23.
HongJ.H.An easy technique for the removal of a hemodialysis catheter stuck in central veins. J Vasc Access.2010; 11(1): 59–62.
24.
HongJ.H.A breakthrough technique for the removal of a hemodialysis catheter stuck in the central vein: endoluminal balloon dilatation of the stuck catheter. J Vasc Access.2011; 12(4): 381–384.
QuarettiP., GalliF., FiorinaI.A refinement of Hong's technique for the removal of stuck dialysis catheters: an easy solution to a complex problem. J Vasc Access.2014; 15(3): 183–188.
27.
OliverM.J., CalleryS.M., ThorpeK.E., SchwabS.J., ChurchillD.N.Risk of bacteremia from temporary hemodialysis catheters by site of insertion and duration of use: a prospective study. Kidney Int.2000; 58(6): 2543–2545.
28.
KairaitisL.K., GottliebT.Outcome and complications of temporary haemodialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant.1999; 14(7): 1710–1714.
Roy-ChaudhuryP., YevzlinA., BonventreJ.V.Academic interventional nephrology: a model for training, research, and patient care. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2012; 7(3): 521–524.
31.
VachharajaniT.J., MoossaviS., SalmanL.Dialysis vascular access management by interventional nephrology programs at University Medical Centers in the United States. Semin Dial.2011; 24(5): 564–569.
32.
KorbetS.M.Nephrology and the percutaneous renal biopsy: a procedure in jeopardy of being lost along the way. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2012; 7(10): 1545–1547.
33.
ClarkE.G., SchachterM.E., PalumboA., KnollG., EdwardsC.Temporary hemodialysis catheter placement by nephrology fellows: implications for nephrology training. Am J Kidney Dis.2013; 62(3): 474–480.
34.
BernsJ.S., EllisonD.H., LinasS.L., RosnerM.H.Training the next generation's nephrology workforce. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2014; 9(9): 1639–1644.
35.
The American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology.Application for Certification Formal Training; Hemodialysis Vascular Access Procedures [cited July 28, 2015]. Available from: http://www.asdin.org/?page=2.
