A comparison of efficacy of endovascular versus surgical repair for the treatment of arteriovenous fistula stenosis in Taiwan

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and fistula reconstruction surgery are therapeutic options for vascular access occlusion in hemodialysis patients. However, owing to its convenience, PTA has gradually become the preferred therapeutic option for fistula stenosis or occlusion. This study investigated the effects of the two therapeutic methods on the vascular access maintenance duration (number of days) and maintenance costs of fistula in dialysis patients from different dialysis units.

Methodology

In this study, 544 hemodialysis patients from 2 dialysis units in a teaching hospital in the southern area of Taiwan were included in the analysis of the frequency of PTA or revascularization surgery and the use of related medical resources by conducting a retrospective chart review.

Results

The frequency of PTA in the patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis was not significantly associated with their demographic characteristics. The efficacy of PTA has declined with shorter maintenance duration with increasing PTA frequency. The cost profile of PTA was more expensive than that of fistula revascularization surgery.

Conclusions

In this study, PTA was found to be just a temporary solution for fistula thrombosis, whereas fistula reconstruction surgery is inexpensive and improves survival time. Therefore, dialysis units should establish an appropriate standard of care to avoid over-reliance on PTA in order to reduce the fistula failure rate, improve the dialysis efficacy, and reduce the psychological stress in patients, as well as to reduce the maintenance costs and rationalize the medical expenses.

Keywords

Hemodialysis Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty Revascularization surgery Vascular access

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chan

Fan

Liu

Chiang

Addressing health disparities in chronic kidney disease.

Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11(12):12848–12865

Bittl

Catheter interventions for hemodialysis fistulas and grafts.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3(1):1–11

Santoro

Benedetto

Mondello

et al.

Vascular access for hemodialysis: current perspectives.

Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2014;7:281–294

Shetty

Whittier

Does regular surveillance improve the long-term survival of arteriovenous fistulas?

Int J Nephrol 2012;2012:539608

Pantelias

Grapsa

Vascular access today.

World J Nephrol 2012;1(3):69–78

Neyra

Ikizler

May

et al.

Change in access blood flow over time predicts vascular access thrombosis.

Kidney Int 1998;54(5):1714–1719

Miller

Tolwani

Luscy

et al.

Predictors of adequacy of arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients.

Kidney Int 1999;56(1):275–280

Hakim

Himmelfarb

Hemodialysis access failure: a call to action.

Kidney Int 1998;54(4):1029–1040

Tan

May

Robless

Outcomes of endovascular intervention for salvage of failing hemodialysis access.

Ann Vasc Dis 2011;4(2):87–92

10.

McCarley

Wingard

Shyr

Pettus

Hakim

Ikizler

Vascular access blood flow monitoring reduces access morbidity and costs.

Kidney Int 2001;60(3):1164–1172

11.

Vascular Access 2006 Work Group.

Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;48(Suppl 1):S176–S247

12.

Polkinghorne

Lau

Saunder

Atkins

Kerr

Does monthly native arteriovenous fistula blood-flow surveillance detect significant stenosisa randomized controlled trial.

Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21(9):2498–2506

13.

Haskal

Trerotola

Dolmatch

et al.

Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts.

N Engl J Med 2010;362(6):494–503

14.

Lok

Foley

Vascular access morbidity and mortality: trends of the last decade.

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;8(7):1213–1219

15.

Smith

Gohil

Chetter

Factors affecting the patency of arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis access.

J Vasc Surg 2012;55(3):849–855

16.

Allon

Lok

Dialysis fistula or graft: the role for randomized clinical trials.

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5(12):2348–2354

17.

Allon

Current management of vascular access.

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;2(4):786–800

18.

Gibbons

Primary vascular access.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;31(5):523–529

19.

Sidawy

Spergel

Besarab

et al;

Society for Vascular Surgery.

The Society for Vascular Surgery: clinical practice guidelines for the surgical placement and maintenance of arteriovenous hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2008;485 Suppl 2S–25S

20.

Bountouris

Kristmundsson

Dias

Zdanowski

Malina

Is repeat PTA of a failing hemodialysis fistula durable?

Int J Vasc Med 2014;2014:369687

21.

Chan

Pflederer

Steele

et al.

Access survival amongst hemodialysis patients referred for preventive angiography and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6(11):2669–2680

22.

Vesely

Siegel

Use of the peripheral cutting balloon to treat hemodialysis-related stenoses.

J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16(12):1593–1603

23.

Bakken

Protack

Saad

Lee

Waldman

Davies

Long-term outcomes of primary angioplasty and primary stenting of central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients.

J Vasc Surg 2007;45(4):776–783

24.

Henry

Routine surveillance in vascular access for hemodialysis.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;32(5):545–548

25.

Coentrão

Turmel-Rodrigues

Monitoring dialysis arteriovenous fistulae: it's in our hands.

J Vasc Access 2013;14(3):209–215

26.

Mickley

Stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulae and grafts: the surgeons point of view.

Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19(2):309–311