Transulnar approach as an alternative to transradial approach in non-coronary intervention: safety,feasibility and technical factors

Anderson SG Ratib K Myint PK et al. Impact of age on access site-related outcomes in 469,983 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: Insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86(6):965–972

Ratib K Mamas MA Anderson SG et al; British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;81 1 Pt A:20–29

Bertrand OF Rao SV Pancholy S et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3(10):1022–1031

Mamas MA Anderson SG Carr M et al; British Cardiovascular Intervention Society; National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64(15):1554–1564

Valgimigli M Gagnor A Calabró P et al; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015;385(9986):2465–2476

Amin AP House JA Safley DM et al. Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6(8):827–834

Benamer H Louvard Y Sanmartin M et al. A multicentre comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and PTCA in obese patients: the TROP registry. EuroIntervention 2007;3(3):327–332

Pristipino C Trani C Nazzaro MS et al; Prospective REgistry of Vascular Access in Interventions in Lazio Region Study Group. Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterisation: results from the PREVAIL study. Heart 2009;95(6):476–482

Posham R Biederman DM Patel RS et al. Transradial Approach for Noncoronary Interventions: A Single-Center Review of Safety and Feasibility in the First 1,500 Cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016;27(2):159–166

Shiozawa S Tsuchiya A Endo S et al. Transradial approach for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with conventional transfemoral approach. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003;37(5) 412–417

Garg N Madan BK Khanna R et al. Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angioplasty: Doppler-guided follow-up study. J Invasive Cardiol 2015;27(2):106–112

Deftereos S Giannopoulos G Kossyvakis C et al. Radial artery flow-mediated dilation predicts arterial spasm during transradial coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;77(5):649–654

Baumann F Roberts JS Real Time intraprocedural ultrasound measurements of the radial and ulnar arteries in 565 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention via the wrist: understanding anatomy and anomalies may improve access success. J Interv Cardiol 2015;28(6):574–582

Gokhroo R Kishor K Ranwa B et al. Ulnar Artery Interventions Non-Inferior to Radial Approach: AJmer Ulnar ARtery (AJULAR) Intervention Working Group Study Results. J Invasive Cardiol 2016;28(1):1–8

Dahal K Rijal J Lee J Korr KS Azrin M Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016;87(5):857–865

Kamiya H Ushijima T Kanamori T et al. Use of the radial artery graft after transradial catheterization: is it suitable as a bypass conduit? Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76(5):1505–1509

Aptecar E Pernes JM Chabane-Chaouch M et al. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67(5):711–720

de Andrade PB Tebet MA Nogueira EF et al. Transulnar approach as an alternative access site for coronary invasive procedures after transradial approach failure. Am Heart J 2012;164(4):462–467

Omary RA Bettmann MA Cardella JF et al; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;149 Pt 2:S293–S295

Lincoff AM Bittl JA Harrington RA et al; REPLACE-2 Investigators. Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA 2003;289(7):853–863

Barbeau GR Arsenault F Dugas L Simard S Larivière MM Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allens test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J 2004;147(3):489–493

Fischman AM Swinburne NC Patel RS A technical guide describing the use of transradial access technique for endovascular interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2015;18(2):58–65

Beyer AT Ng R Singh A et al. Topical nitroglycerin and lidocaine to dilate the radial artery prior to transradial cardiac catheterization: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial: the PRE-DILATE Study. Int J Cardiol 2013;168(3):2575–2578

Hahalis G Tsigkas G Xanthopoulou I et al; The Transulnar or Transradial Instead of Coronary Transfemoral Angiographies Study (the AURA of ARTEMIS Study). Transulnar compared with transradial artery approach as a default strategy for coronary procedures: a randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6(3):252–261

Gokhroo R Bisht D Gupta S Kishor K Ranwa B Palmar arch anatomy: Ajmer Working Group classification. Vascular 2016;24(1):31–36

Kedev S Zafirovska B Dharma S Petkoska D Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014;83(1):E51–60