Factors Influencing Young Urologists’ Productivity and Academic Career Choice

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to identify the variables that affect young urologists’ productivity and academic career choice.

Patients and Methods

We have conducted an internet-based national survey for urologists randomly sampled from the database of Turkish Urological Association and 110 physicians completed this survey. Participants were asked to answer three-page questionnaire including 37 questions, which takes around 5 min to complete. Questionnaire was consisting of four main sections: ‘demography’, ‘education’, ‘working conditions’ and ‘quality of life’.

Results

Increased dedicated research time, being interested in an academic career, being Fellow of the European Board of Urology (FEBU), having English proficiency, and greater numbers of manuscript publication during residency were associated with increased productivity after residency (p = 0.001, p = 0.028, p = 0.046, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). The remaining variables including age at marriage, age at having a child, monthly salary, length of residency, having a mentor or role model during residency showed no significant relationship with manuscript publications. Twenty-nine physicians (26.4%) stated that they had once been interested in their residency but were no longer interested in academic urology. Reasons for this loss of academic interest included lack of effective mentor or role model (27.2%), bureaucracy (17%), financial issues (13.6%), mandatory rule to work in public hospitals (18.2%) or military hospitals (9%) and language problems (21.6%).

Conclusions

Our data indicate that increased time spent for research, being interested in an academic career, being an FEBU, having English proficiency, and greater publication during residency were associated with increased numbers of publications and academic career choice.

Keywords

Academic career Productivity Publication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Grover

Tan

Srivastava

Leung

Tewari

Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents. Curr Urol Rep. 2010; 11 (2): 87–92.

Lightfoot

Rosevear

Steers

Tracy

Current and future need for academic urologists in the United States. J Urol. 2011; 185 (6): 2283–2287.

Yang

Zaid

Erickson

Blaschko

Carroll

Breyer

Urology resident publication output and its relationship to future academic achievement. J Urol. 2011; 185 (2): 642–646.

Resorlu

Diri

Atmaca

. Can we avoid percutaneous nephrolithotomy in high-risk elderly patients using the Charlson comorbidity index? Urology. 2012; 79 (5): 1042–1047.

Dorsey

Raphael

Balcer

Galetta

Predictors of future publication record and academic rank in a cohort of neurology residents. Neurology. 2006; 67 (8): 1335–1337.

Crowley

Asthagiri

Starke

Zusman

Chiocca

Lonser

RR;

Research Committee of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. In-training factors predictive of choosing and sustaining a productive academic career path in neurological surgery. Neurosurgery. 2012; 70 (4): 1024–1032.

Yang

Villalta

Weiss

Carroll

Breyer

Gender differences in academic productivity and academic career choice among urology residents. J Urol. 2012; 188 (4): 1286–1290.

Miller

Wood

Miller

Marks

Academics or private practice? The future of dermatologic surgery education. Dermatol Surg. 2006; 32 (1): 70–75, discussion 76-78.

Reck

Stratman

Vogel

Mukesh

Assessment of residents’ loss of interest in academic careers and identification of correctable factors. Arch Dermatol. 2006; 142 (7): 855–858.

10.

Bergstresser

Perceptions of the academic environment: a national survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991; 25 (6 Pt 1): 1092–1096.