This paper provides an overview and discussion of the methodologies used in measuring the impact of tourism. The Danish LINE model is presented, together with the tourism sub-model. The LINE model is an inter-regional macro-economic model describing the economy of 275 Danish municipalities. The tourism sub-model is an integrated part of the LINE model, in which tourism data are built as a part of private consumption. The advantage of building the tourism model within the framework of the inter-regional macro-economic model is that many regional economic indicators can be shown from the impact analysis. Regional tourism demand and the economic consequences are presented as the results of modelling.
BriguglioL. (1993), ‘Tourism multipliers in the Maltese economy’, in JohnsonThomas (1993).
6.
CooperC., ed (1989), Progress in Tourism Recreation and Hospitality Management, Vol 1, Belhaven, London.
7.
CooperC., ed (1991), Progress in Tourism Recreation and Hospitality Management, Vol 3, Belhaven, London.
8.
Danish Tourist Council (1996, 1998 and 1999), Turismens Økonomiske Betydning Nationalt og Regionalt.
9.
DelisleJ. (1999), ‘The Canadian national tourism indicators: A dynamic picture of the satellite account’, Tourism Economics, Vol 5, No 4, pp 331–343.
10.
EriksenL.AhmtT. (1999), ‘Measuring and modelling the regional impact of tourism in Denmark’, International Journal of Tourism Research, Vol 1, pp 313–327.
11.
FletcherJ. E. (1989), ‘Input–output analysis and tourism impact studies’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 16, pp 514–529.
12.
FletcherJ. E.ArcherB.H. (1991), ‘The development and application of multiplier analysis’, in Cooper (1991).
13.
FrechtlingD. C.HorvathE. (1999), ‘Estimating the multiplier effects of tourism expenditures on a local economy through a regional input–output model’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol 37, No 4, pp 324–332.
14.
FreemanD.SultanE. (1997), ‘The economic impact of tourism in Israel: A multi-regional input–output analysis’, Tourism Economics, 1997, Vol 3, No 4, pp 341–359.
15.
HansenC.JensenS. (1996), ‘The impact of tourism on employment in Denmark: Different definitions, different results’, Tourism Economics, 1996, Vol 2, No 4, pp 283–302.
16.
HansenR. (1970), General Equilibrium System, McGraw-Hill, New York.
17.
JohnsonP.ThomasB., ed (1993), Perspectives on Tourism Policy, Mansell, London.
18.
MadsenB.Jensen-ButlerC.DamP.U.JohnsonH. (2001a), The LINE-model, AKF, Copenhagen.
19.
MadsenB.Jensen-ButlerC.DamP.U. (2001b), A Social Accounting Matrix for Danish Municipalities, AKF, Copenhagen.
20.
MeisS. M. (1999), ‘The Canadian experience in developing and using the tourism satellite account’, Tourism Economics, Vol 5, No 4, pp 315–330.
21.
RütterH.BerwertA. (1999), ‘A regional approach for tourism satellite accounts and links to the National Account’, Tourism Economics, Vol 5, No 4, pp 353–381.
22.
WagnerJ. E. (1997), ‘Estimating the economic impact of tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 24, No 3, pp 592–608.
23.
ZhangJ.RassingC.R. (2000), Tourism Impact Studies – the case of Bornholm, Research Centre of Bornholm, Nexo.
24.
ZhangJ.MadsenB. (2001), ‘Private consumption and interregional modeling – data construction’, paper presented at Nordic Regional Science Association Conference, Vänersborg, Sweden, June 2001.
25.
ZhouD.YanagidaJ.F.ChakravortyU.LeungP. (1997), ‘Estimating economic impacts from tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol 24, pp 76–89.
