Modelling Higher Education in Eastern and Central Europe since Perestroika

Abstract

Since perestroika there have been many changes in Central and Eastern Europe. The states of the region have regained the opportunity to establish partnerships within the European Union. Higher education development has enabled increased communication and opportunities for staff and students. Greater interaction has resulted in a greater mobility of people and ideas, supported by the increased use of information and communications technology. A key factor in the globalization of higher education has been the freedom from the ideological constraints that existed before the break-up of the Soviet Union. This paper traces the changing face of higher education in Central and Eastern Europe through a comparison of models using Dynamic Concept Analysis (DCA), drawing on survey responses from Russia, Byelorussia, Central Asia, Bulgaria and Latvia. The survey gathered positive and negative perceptions of change, which were then analysed in focus group discussions. The models produced provide a framework for the interpretation of higher education systems, and suggest a transition model for further development in an increasingly global education market. In this context, the new autonomous nature of higher education institutions in the region is strongly related to scholarship and selection, while their continuing orientation towards teaching creates opportunities for skills development, thus enhancing graduate employability and services to the community, improving the ‘socialization’ of students and ensuring the sustainability of the institution.

Keywords

autonomy Dynamic Concept Analysis external links perestroika transition Eastern Europe

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartell

(2003), ‘Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework’, Higher Education, Vol 45, pp 43–70.

Cox

(2003), Briefing by Pat Cox, President of the European Parliament, University of Surrey, 4 July, personal communication.

DfES (2003), The Future of Higher Education, White Paper, Department for Education and Skills, The Stationery Office, London.

Hall

Thoas

(1999), ‘Higher education reform in a transitional economy: A case study from the School of Economic Study in Mongolia’, Higher Education, Vol 38, pp 441–460.

Hobrough

J.E.

(2003a), ‘Responding to the global economy: Student skill development across an expanding Europe’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 17, No 4, pp 257–264.

Hobrough

J.E.

(2004), ‘Perceptions of change in post-Soviet higher education’, in Proceedings, Opportunities for Positive Change: Facilitating Pan-European Opportunities, University of Surrey, Guildford, April, pp 1–14.

Joint Baltic–Nordic Team (1993), Distance Education in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, Team Report of a Feasibility Study to the Nordic Council of Ministers, Oslo.

Kontiainen

(1973), ‘The behaviour of supervisors assessed by student teachers’, Research Bulletin, No 37, University of Helsinki.

Kontiainen

, ed (2002), Dynamic Concept Analysis (DCA): Integrating Information in Conceptual Models, University of Helsinki Press, Helsinki.

10.

Kontiainen

Tight

(2002), ‘Institutional models of higher education’, in Kontiainen

, ed, Dynamic Concept Analysis (DCA): Integrating Information in Conceptual Models, University of Helsinki Press, Helsinki.

11.

McLeish

E.A.

(2003), ‘Post-totalitarian education transition: To change a label is easy, but to effect a comprehensive change in practice represents a far greater challenge’, European Journal of Education, Vol 38, No 2, pp 163–175.

12.

Neave

(2003), ‘The Bologna Declaration: Some of the historic dilemmas posed by the reconstruction of the community in Europe's systems of higher education’, Education Policy, Vol 17, No 1, pp 141–163.

13.

Nurmi

K.E.

(2002), ‘Dynamic Concept Analysis (DCA) as an educational research tool’, in Kontiainen

, ed, Dynamic Concept Analysis (DCA): Integrating Information in Conceptual Models, University of Helsinki Press, Helsinki.

14.

Parkes

(2003), ‘Assessing an education system in transition’, Editorial, European Journal of Education, Vol 38, No 2, pp 133–146.

15.

Scott

(2002), ‘Reflections on the reform of higher education in Central and Eastern Europe’, Higher Education in Europe, Vol 27, Nos 1–2, pp 137–152.

16.

Stoicha

(2003), ‘Vocational education and training reform in Romania and Bosnia-Herzegovina: Strategy, legislation, and implementation’, European Journal of Education, Vol 38, No 2, pp 213–222.

17.

Tabulawa

(2003), ‘International aid agencies, learner-centred pedagogy and political democratisation: A critique’, Comparative Education, Vol 39, No 1, pp 7–26.

18.

Tight

(1988), ‘So what is academic freedom?’, in Tight

, ed, Academic Freedom and Responsibility, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp 114–132.

19.

UCAS (2002), Paving the Way, HEFCE/UCS Widening Participation Project Report, Universities and Colleges Admissions Service, Cheltenham.

20.

Verbitskaya

Nosova

Rodina

(2002), ‘Sustainable development in higher education in Russia’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol 3, No 3, pp 279–287.