Climbing ‘Fourteeners’, peaks whose summits rise above 14,000 feet, is a popular recreational activity in Colorado. Access to these popular peaks has been jeopardized by liability issues on privately owned peaks and by overuse on publicly owned peaks. To date, there has been little analysis on the economic benefits provided by Fourteeners. This study finds that opening access to three closed peaks presents an infusion into local and state economies of 25 and 45 jobs, respectively. Access to the peaks is worth US$167 per person each trip; a relatively high value in the context of the recreation economics literature.
BergstromJ.DeCivitaP. (1999), ‘Status of benefit transfer in the United States and Canada: A review’, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 47, pp 79–87.
2.
BergstromJ.CordellH.K.WatsonA.AshleyG. (1990), ‘Economic impacts of state parks on state economies in the south’, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 22, No 2, pp 69–77.
3.
BoyleK. (2003), ‘Contingent valuation in practice’, in ChampP.BoyleK.BrownT., eds, Primer on Non-market Valuation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp 111–169.
4.
BrownA. (2006), ‘Town taking down no trespassing signs’, in The Gazette (Colorado Springs, CO), 8 August, www.Gazette.com (last accessed 22 March 2007).
5.
ChenR.HuntK.DittonR. (2003), ‘Estimating the economic impacts of a trophy largemouth bass fishery’, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol 23, pp 835–844.
6.
Colorado Fourteeners Initiative, www.14ers.org (last accessed 20 March 2007).
7.
DillmanD. (2000), Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
8.
EkstrandE. (1994), ‘Economic benefits of resources used for rock climbing at Eldorado Canyon State Park, Colorado’, PhD dissertation, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
9.
EnglishD.BowkerM. (1996), ‘Economic impacts of guided whitewater rafting: A study of five rivers’, Water Resources Bulletin, Vol 32, No 6, pp 1319–1328.
10.
EnglishD.KocisK.ZarnochS.ArnoldJ.R. (2002), ‘Forest Service national visitor use monitoring process’, USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report SRS-57, Southern Research Station, Ashville, NC.
EvansC. (2007), ‘Keeping it wild: Forum looking at how to handle increasing use of Colorado wilderness areas’, in Daily Camera, 16 March, Boulder, CO.
13.
FrazierD. (2006), ‘Fourteeners-access Bill advances’, Rocky Mountain News, 24 January.
14.
GrijalvaT.BerrensR. (2003), ‘Valuing rock climbing and bouldering access’, in HanleyN.ShawD.WrightR., eds, The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, pp 21–39.
15.
GrijalvaT.BerrensR.BoharaA.JakusP.ShawD. (2002), ‘Valuing the loss of rock climbing access in wilderness area’, Land Economics, Vol 78, No 1, pp 103–120.
16.
GujaratiD. (2003), Basic Econometrics, 4th edn, McGraw-Hill Company, New York.
17.
HanemannW.M. (1989), ‘Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete data’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 71, No 3, pp 1057–1061.
18.
KedrowskiJ. (2006), ‘Assessing human–environmental impacts on Colorado's 14,000 foot mountains’, MS thesis, Department of Geography, University of Southern Florida, FL.
19.
LoomisJ. (2000), ‘Counting on recreation use data: A call for long-term monitoring’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 32, No 1, pp 93–96.
20.
LoomisJ.WalshR. (1997), Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs, Venture Publishing, State College, PA.
MitchellR.C.CarsonR.T. (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
23.
RosenbergerR.LoomisJ. (2001), ‘Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: A technical document supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan (2000 Revision)’, RMRS-GTR-72, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO.
