Achieving Engineering Competencies in the Global Information Society through the Integration of On-Campus and Workplace Environments

Abstract

Engineering organizations are increasingly under pressure to perform more efficiently with fewer people. To manage this, organizations need to understand what skills, knowledge and behaviours they need from engineers who have to practise in a global information society. Engineering educators, in collaboration with employers, therefore now need to think of how to place competencies for engineers in this new context. A model for preparing the educators and employers to face this challenge is proposed. This takes into account the change in mindset required to address the development of competencies for engineers when often the approach has to be context-driven to address global working. The model is based on developing a methodology by which a set of learning outcomes supported by aims and objectives may best be achieved. These learning outcomes are informed by the consideration of international frameworks and agreements which specify engineering professional competencies together with the corresponding graduate attributes. The core concept of the model is discussed and related to specific outcomes for educator and employer to facilitate and students to achieve. While consideration is given to what competencies are needed for tomorrow's engineering education, it is concluded that more relevant is the need to reconsider existing competencies in the context of engineers in global practice. This will require educators to be more responsive and prepared to support the development and evolution of competencies that are sustainable and robust in global sociological, political and economic systems. Central to the success of the model is the need to establish a learning equilibrium between on-campus and work-based experiential studies using globally-based industries.

Keywords

global engineering competencies intercultural competence information society experiential study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bologna Process (2005), A Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area, prepared by the Bologna Working Group on Qualifications Frameworks, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Copenhagen.

Burns

G.R.

Chisholm

C.U.

(2002), ‘Factors to be considered in replacing the traditional engineering curriculum approach by an undergraduate work-based learning approach’, paper presented at the 3rd UICEE Global Congress on Engineering Education, Glasgow, 30 June–5 July.

Burns

G.R.

Chisholm

C. U.

(2005), ‘Graduate to professional engineer in a knowledge organisation: Does the undergraduate curriculum provide the basic skills?’ paper presented at the 8th Annual UICEE Conference on Engineering Education, Kingston, 7–11 February.

Chisholm

C.U.

(2003), ‘Negotiated learning systems – a way forward for engineering education’, paper presented at the 1st North-East Asia Conference on Engineering and Technology Education. Taiwan, 10–13 November.

Chisholm

C.U.

(2006), ‘Educating the engineering educators on the development of competencies for a global information society’, paper presented at the 9th Annual UICEE Conference on Engineering Education, Muscat, 11–15 February.

Chisholm

C.U.

Burns

G.R.

(1999), ‘The Role of work-based and workplace learning in the development of lifelong learning for engineers’, Global Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 3, No, 3, pp 235–241.

Chisholm

C.U.

Holifield

D.M.

Davis

M.S.G.

(2005), ‘The development of a model based on learning development agreements for the professional development of engineers’, paper presented at the 8th Annual UICEE Conference on Engineering Education, Kingston, 7–11 February.

EMF (2005), Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies, Engineers Mobility Forum, Ver. 1.1, www.ieagreements.com/GradProfiles.cfm.

Engineering Council (2004), UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence, The Engineering Council, London.

10.

EUR-ACE (2005), Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes, European Accredited Engineer, www.feani.org/EUR_ACE/reports_accrstand.htm.

11.

FEANI (2005), Competencies of Professional Engineers/Eur Eng, European Federation of National Engineering Associations (FEANI), Brussels.

12.

Giddons

(1998), ‘Higher education relevance in the 21st century’, paper presented at the UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education in the 21st Century, Paris, 5–9 October.

13.

Graaf de

Kolmos

(2003), ‘Characteristics of problem-based learning’. International Journal of Engineering. Education, Vol 19, No 5, pp 657–662.

14.

Hills

Tedford

(2003), ‘The education of engineers: The uneasy relationship between engineering, science and technology’, Global Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 7, No 1, pp 17–28.

15.

Hofstede

(1997), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 2nd edition, McGraw Hill, New York.

16.

Jacob

Hellstrom

, eds (2000), The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy, Society for Research into Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.

17.

Jansen

D.E.

(2004), ‘Developing the intercultural competence of engineering students: A proposal for the method and contents of a seminar’, World Transactions on Engineering and Teaching Education, Vol 3, No 1.

18.

Kolmos

(2002), ‘Future competencies and learning methods in engineering education’, paper presented at the 6th Baltic Region Seminar on Engineering Education, Wismar, 23–25 September.

19.

Lave

Wenger

(1991), Situated Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

20.

Washington Accord (1988), Recognition of Equivalency of Accredited Engineering Education Programmes Leading to the Engineering Degree, www.washingtonaccord.org/ (established 1988).

21.

Wenger

(1998), Communities of Practice – Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.