Collaboration between economic agents, especially in technological areas, is characterized by ambiguity in terminology, multiple analytical approaches, a diversity of objectives and multiple organizational forms, among which the network constitutes the most important example of ‘common organization’ in international collaboration. This paper describes the main factors in the structure of a network that develops an R&D project and the predominant aspects of its management. The authors then discuss an empirical study based on technological projects developed within the framework of European RTD programmes. The sample comprises 350 industrial liaison organizations (ILOs) which often take an active part in the European Commission's Framework Programmes. The results show, from a structural point of view, how a network is shaped for technological product development. From the management perspective, the discussion highlights the role of the promoter and partners in achieving a project's objectives in terms of organization, decision and control.
AronsonZ.H.LechlerT.ReillyR.R.ShenharA.J. (2001), ‘Project spirit: A strategic concept’, in KocaogluD. F.AndersonT.R., eds, Technology Management in the Knowledge Era, Portland International Conference on the Management of Engineering and Technology, PICMET'01, Portland, OR.
2.
AusterE. (1994), ‘Macro and strategic perspectives on interorganizational linkages: A comparative analysis and review with suggestions for reorientation’, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol 10, No B, pp 3–40.
3.
BarkerK.CameronH. (2004), ‘European Union science and technology policy, RJV collaboration and competition policy’, in CaloghirouY.VornotasN.C.IoannidesS., eds, European Collaboration in Research and Development: Business Strategy and Public Policy, Edwar Elgar, Edwar Elgar.
4.
BetzF. (1996), ‘Industry–university partnerships’, in GaynorG., ed, Handbook of Technology Management, McGraw Hill, McGraw Hill.
5.
BierlyP.E.CoombsJ.E. (2004), ‘Equity alliances, stages of product development, and alliance instability’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol 21, No 3, pp 191–214.
6.
BlackneyN.S.PapadakisC.N. (2004), ‘Leveraging industry relationships in the academic enterprise’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 18, No 2, pp 89–94.
7.
BonaccorsiA.PiccalugaA. (1994), ‘A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university–industry relationships’, R&D Management, Vol 24, No 3, pp 229–247.
8.
BranstetterL.G.SakakibaraM. (2002), ‘When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data’, American Economic Review, Vol 92, No 1, pp 143–159.
9.
BrockhoffK. (1992), ‘R&D cooperation between firms: A perceived transaction cost perspective’, Management Science, Vol 38, No 4, pp 514–524.
10.
CORDIS (2004), ‘Projects database: Advanced and professional database search’, http://cordis. europa.lu/search/index.dfm.
11.
DahlM.S.PedersenO.R. (2005), ‘Social networks in the R&D process: The case of the wireless communication industry around Aalbord, Denmark’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol 22, No 1–2, pp 75–92.
12.
DyerJ.H.NobeokaK. (2000), ‘Creating and managing a high performance knowledge sharing network: The case of Toyota’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 21, No 3, pp 345–367.
13.
DozY.L.OlkP.M.RingP.S. (2000), ‘Formation processes of R&D consortia: Which path to take? Where does it lead?’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 21, No 3, pp 239–266.
14.
EdquistC. (1997), ‘Systems of innovation approaches: Their emergence and characteristics’, in EdquistC., ed, Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter, London.
15.
GranovetterM. (1985), ‘Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol 91, No 3, pp 481–510.
16.
GulatiR. (1998), ‘Alliances and networks’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 19, No 4, pp 293–317.
17.
HagedoornJ. (1993), ‘Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 14, No 5, pp 371–385.
18.
HagedoornJ.LinkA.VonortasN. (2000), ‘Research partnerships’, Research Policy, Vol 29, No 4–5, pp 567–586.
19.
JohansenK.ComstockM.WinrothM. (2005), ‘Coordination in collaborative manufacturing mega-networks: A case study’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol 22, No 3, pp 226–244.
20.
KnellerR. (2007), ‘Japan's new technology discoveries by sponsored research and co-inventorship’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 21, No 3, pp 211–220.
21.
MarchJ.G. (1991), ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, Organization Science, Vol 2, No 1, pp 71–87.
22.
MarschakJ. (1974), Economics Information, Decision and Prediction. Selected Essays, Vol II, D. Reidel, Berlin.
23.
MintzbergH. (1979), The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
24.
MoraE. (2000), ‘University–industry cooperation: A framework of benefits and obstacles’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 14, No 3, pp 165–172.
25.
Pek-HooiS.RobertsE.B. (2005), ‘Technology alliances and networks: An external link to research capability’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol 52, No 4, pp 419–428.
26.
PowellW.W.KoputK.W.Smith-DoerrL. (1996), ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 41, No 1, pp 116–145.
27.
RingP.S.Van de VenA.H. (1994), ‘Developmental processes of co-operative interorganizational relationships’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 19, No 1, pp 90–118.
28.
RobertsonT.S.GatignonH. (1998), ‘Technology development mode: A transaction cost conceptualization’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 19, No 6, pp 515–531.
29.
RowleyT.BehrensD.KrackhardtD. (2000), ‘Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 21, No 3, pp 369–386.
30.
RycroftR.W. (2007), ‘Innovation networks and the speed and spread of complex technological innovation’, Technological Forecasting Social Change, Vol 74, No 5, pp 567–578.
31.
SantoroM.D.ChakrabartiA.K. (2001), ‘Corporate strategic objectives for establishing relationships with university research centers’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol 48, No 2, pp 157–163.
32.
TimmersP. (1999), ‘Building effective public R&D programmes’, in KocaogluD.F.AndersonT.R., eds, Technology and Innovation Management, Portland International Conference on the Management of Engineering and Technology, PICMET'99, Portland, OR.
33.
TurpinT.GarretJ.S.RankinN. (1996), ‘Bricoleurs and boundary riders: Managing basic research and innovation knowledge networks’, R&D Management, Vol 26, No 3, pp 267–282.
34.
VargaL.AllenP. (2006), ‘Case-study of the three largest aerospace manufacturing organizations: An exploration of organizational strategy, innovation and evolution’, Emergence: Complexity and Organization, Vol 8, No 2, pp 48–63.
35.
WilliamsonO.E. (2002), ‘The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract’, Economic Perspective, Vol 16, No 3, pp 171–196.
36.
ZhengP.HarrisM. (2007), ‘The university in the knowledge economy: The Triple Helix model and its implications’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 21, No 4, pp 253–263.
