Strategic policy making for rural regions has gained increasing importance during the last few decades in the European Union. A coherent framework for the development of agricultural and rural policy measures has been made available (Council Decision 2006/144/EC), which integrates Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis as an essential step in regional stocktaking and ex ante appraisal. The authors start with an outline of the SWOT tool as part of the EU's overall strategic approach and follow this with an overview of the conceptual backgrounds in management theory and organizational development. Then, on the basis of two examples, the tool's recent use in agriculture and rural development is demonstrated and discussed. Conclusions are drawn for the instrument's future application.
AeberhardK. (1996), Strategische Analyse, Empfehlungen zum Vorgehen und zu sinnvollen Methodenkombinationen, Lang Verlag, Bern.
2.
Borrini-FeyerabendG. (2000), Co-management of Natural Resources: Organising, Negotiating and Learning-by-Doing, GTZ and IUCN, Kasparek-Verlag, Heidelberg.
3.
DeybeD. (2007), ‘Policies, research perspective and challenges on multifunctional land use’ in ManderÜ. eds, Multifunctional Land Use, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, pp 143–152.
DysonR. G. (2004), ‘Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick’, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 152, No 3 pp 631–640.
9.
European Commission (2006), ‘Agriculture and Rural Development, Monitoring and Evaluation: Common monitoring and evaluation framework’, Website: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/eval/index_en.htm (accessed 21 July 2008).
10.
EU (1999), ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 of 17 May 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain Regulations’, Official Journal of the European Union, 26 June, Vol 42, L 160/80.
11.
EU (2003), ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the Common Agricultural Policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers’, Official Journal of the European Union, 21 October, Vol 46, L 270/1.
12.
EU (2005a), ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the Common Agricultural Policy’, Official Journal of the European Union, 11 August Vol 48, L 209/1.
13.
EU (2005b), ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)’, Official Journal of the European Union, 21 October, Vol 48, L 277/1.
14.
EU (2006), ‘Council Decision of 20 February 2006 on Community strategic guidelines for rural development (programming period 2007 to 2013)’, Official Journal of the European Union, 25 February, Vol 49, L 55/20.
NowickiP. (2007), Scenar 2020: Scenario Study on Agriculture and the Rural World, Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
21.
O'ConnorD., eds (2006), Driving Rural Development: Policy and Practise in Seven EU Countries, Royal Van Gorcum BV, Assen, The Netherlands.
22.
OECD (1996), Territorial Indicators of Employment: Focusing on Rural Development, OECD, Paris.
23.
OECD (2005), New Approaches to Rural Policy: Lessons From Around the World, OECD, Paris.
Van der PloegJ. D. (2000), ‘Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory’, Sociologia Ruralis, Vol 40, No 4 pp 391–408.
27.
WesthoekM.van den BergM.BakkesJ. A. (2006), ‘Scenario development to explore the future of Europe's rural areas’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol 114, pp 7–20.
