BrooksH. (1994), ‘Research universities and the social contract for science,’ in BramscombL., ed, Empowering Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 202–234.
2.
EtzkowitzH. (1996), ‘Conflicts of interest and commitment in academic science in the United States’, Minerva, Vol 34, pp 259–277.
3.
EtzkowitzH. (1998), ‘The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages’, Research Policy, Vol 27, pp 823–833.
4.
EtzkowitzH.LeydesdorffL. (1995), ‘The Triple Helix – university–industry–government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development’, EEAST Review, Vol 14, pp 14–19.
5.
EtzkowitzH.LeydesdorffL. (2000), ‘The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations’, Research Policy, Vol 29, pp 109–123.
6.
EtzkowitzH.WebsterA.GebhardtC.TerraB.R.C. (2000), ‘The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm’, Research Policy, Vol 29, pp 313–330.
7.
FreemanC. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.
8.
KrimskyS. (1991), ‘Academic–corporate ties in biotechnology: A quantitative study’, Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol 16, pp 275–287.
9.
LundvallB.A. (1988), ‘Innovation as an interactive process: From user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation’, in DosiG.FreemanC.NelsonR.SilverbergG.SoeteL., eds, Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London, pp 349–369.
10.
NelsonR.R.WinterS.G. (1977), ‘In search of useful theory of innovation’, Research Policy, Vol 6, pp 35–76.
11.
NelsonR.R.WinterS.G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
12.
PelikanJ. (1992), The Idea of the University: A Re-examination, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.